Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The science is settled...???

HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
in Tug Tavern
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf

NO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE SIGNIFICANTANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE

Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,012 Standard Supporter
    The liberal science deniers will be out in force any minute now to deny this scientific research.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    LMAO a 6 page pamphlet posted on a repository that is open to anyone to post essentially anything. A "report" that contains no method section or data sources and all the references except two are to themselves. scientific research....lol.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,012 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    LMAO a 6 page pamphlet posted on a repository that is open to anyone to post essentially anything. A "report" that contains no method section or data sources and all the references except two are to themselves. scientific research....lol.

    Umm.....this is a new paper. Many new pieces of research are summarized and posted prior to peer review. For anyone who has been through the peer review process you know that those that review research don't even have to attach their name to the review. As we have seen in the recent past many research papers that went against the grant grab and globalization that is man made global warming were savagely and unfairly cut up while at the same time honest peers would give counter reviews on the same research. There have been many accusations of biased peer reviews in particular where man made global warming is concerned which undoubtedly is why many post their summaries like this prior to handing it over to potential reviewers. My chemist for my own company published research he did while working for me and he already knew who would respond and in what fashion before the review even took place.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,822 Founders Club
    Just don't call it a religion
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,859 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2019
    GDS said:

    LMAO a 6 page pamphlet posted on a repository that is open to anyone to post essentially anything. A "report" that contains no method section or data sources and all the references except two are to themselves. scientific research....lol.

    Sounds more like global warming work. Just make numbers up as you go and exclude anything that didn't fit your predetermined outcome.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.