Do you recall the Rats having anything to do with this Hondo?"Two programs — Medicare and Medicaid — are expected to account for 86% of all estimated HHS spending in FY2019," it said.In the first eight months of this fiscal year, which began in October, HHS spent $834,346,000,000, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement for May. That is up from $731,724,000,000 in the first eight months of last fiscal year.Through all of fiscal 2018, HHS spent approximately $1,120,500,000,000 — or $93,375,000,000 per month.Through this full fiscal year, according to the estimate published in the Monthly Treasury Statement, HHS will spend approximately $1,230,273,000,000 — or $102,522,750,000 per month.In May alone, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement, HHS spent $146,552,000,000. Who passed Medicare part D?There being said Bob. What actions from Democrats the last two years are responsible for the Medicare increase?
Do you recall the Rats having anything to do with this Hondo?"Two programs — Medicare and Medicaid — are expected to account for 86% of all estimated HHS spending in FY2019," it said.In the first eight months of this fiscal year, which began in October, HHS spent $834,346,000,000, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement for May. That is up from $731,724,000,000 in the first eight months of last fiscal year.Through all of fiscal 2018, HHS spent approximately $1,120,500,000,000 — or $93,375,000,000 per month.Through this full fiscal year, according to the estimate published in the Monthly Treasury Statement, HHS will spend approximately $1,230,273,000,000 — or $102,522,750,000 per month.In May alone, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement, HHS spent $146,552,000,000.
Revenues are up. As is spending. Same as it ever wasIn fact if the democrats weren't retards they could get a bunch more spending because of the democrat in the White House who likes to spendI will never support tax hikes because its my money and I do better with it than the idiots in DC. Its not a tax problem it is a spending problem. Despite these "massive" tax cuts we still pay out about 50% of what we make to all levels of government. You can take all the wealth of the top 1% and run the country for around a year. Then what? Is actually only about 3 months, but your poont stands.
Revenues are up. As is spending. Same as it ever wasIn fact if the democrats weren't retards they could get a bunch more spending because of the democrat in the White House who likes to spendI will never support tax hikes because its my money and I do better with it than the idiots in DC. Its not a tax problem it is a spending problem. Despite these "massive" tax cuts we still pay out about 50% of what we make to all levels of government. You can take all the wealth of the top 1% and run the country for around a year. Then what?
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama?
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited?
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited? Please understand the difference between the debt and the deficit before commenting.
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited? Please understand the difference between the debt and the deficit before commenting. Not to mention. Decreased revenues from the recession was a large contributing factor to the increase in debt and large deficit during Obama's first few years.
We're never going to fix the deficit. The GOP wants to massively cut taxes and maybe not massively add to spending (cutting spending never happens). Democrats want to raise taxes and massively raise spending. Both sides are fiscally retarded.Meanwhile we pass more and more debt onto future generations everyday while both sides act like they gaf about "the children!"Fuck em both.
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited? Please understand the difference between the debt and the deficit before commenting. Not to mention. Decreased revenues from the recession was a large contributing factor to the increase in debt and large deficit during Obama's first few years. Ummmmmm....have you looked at revenues vs expenditures from 2008-2016? The majority of the debt was due to expenditures. Revenue fell slightly in 2008, was off 17% in 2009 and has been steadily climbing since to what will be a record 3.44 trillion this year. Up 61% in 10 years. US population is up 8% in that timeframe. Revenue isn’t, nor has it been the “large contributing factor” to the debt. Cue the “but the tax cuts were SOLD as...blah blah blah”. Fuck off.
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited? Please understand the difference between the debt and the deficit before commenting. Not to mention. Decreased revenues from the recession was a large contributing factor to the increase in debt and large deficit during Obama's first few years. Ummmmmm....have you looked at revenues vs expenditures from 2008-2016? The majority of the debt was due to expenditures. Revenue fell slightly in 2008, was off 17% in 2009 and has been steadily climbing since to what will be a record 3.44 trillion this year. Up 61% in 10 years. US population is up 8% in that timeframe. Revenue isn’t, nor has it been the “large contributing factor” to the debt. Cue the “but the tax cuts were SOLD as...blah blah blah”. Fuck off. I didn't say majority. I said a large contributing factor. And it took until. 2013 for revenues to be higher than 08. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/hist01z1-fy2020.xlsx
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited? Please understand the difference between the debt and the deficit before commenting. Not to mention. Decreased revenues from the recession was a large contributing factor to the increase in debt and large deficit during Obama's first few years. Ummmmmm....have you looked at revenues vs expenditures from 2008-2016? The majority of the debt was due to expenditures. Revenue fell slightly in 2008, was off 17% in 2009 and has been steadily climbing since to what will be a record 3.44 trillion this year. Up 61% in 10 years. US population is up 8% in that timeframe. Revenue isn’t, nor has it been the “large contributing factor” to the debt. Cue the “but the tax cuts were SOLD as...blah blah blah”. Fuck off. I didn't say majority. I said a large contributing factor. And it took until. 2013 for revenues to be higher than 08. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/hist01z1-fy2020.xlsx That speaks more to the shitty Obama economy than anything else. What would have happened to the budget deficit if we had just reduced spending in 2012 to what we spent in 2007?
So 75% to go to hit hero status like Obama? What an insane misunderstanding of government finances Yeah Obama basically doubled the debt he inherited by spending more than all previous presidents combined. So if Trump increased by 25% how much more would it take to double it from the number he inherited? Please understand the difference between the debt and the deficit before commenting. Not to mention. Decreased revenues from the recession was a large contributing factor to the increase in debt and large deficit during Obama's first few years. Ummmmmm....have you looked at revenues vs expenditures from 2008-2016? The majority of the debt was due to expenditures. Revenue fell slightly in 2008, was off 17% in 2009 and has been steadily climbing since to what will be a record 3.44 trillion this year. Up 61% in 10 years. US population is up 8% in that timeframe. Revenue isn’t, nor has it been the “large contributing factor” to the debt. Cue the “but the tax cuts were SOLD as...blah blah blah”. Fuck off. I didn't say majority. I said a large contributing factor. And it took until. 2013 for revenues to be higher than 08. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/hist01z1-fy2020.xlsx That speaks more to the shitty Obama economy than anything else. What would have happened to the budget deficit if we had just reduced spending in 2012 to what we spent in 2007? What would have happened to the budget is we didn't pass Medicare part D without funding it? What happens to expenditures when unemployment goes through the roof and resulting benefit payments are to be made?
The GOP is a sick and insane party
The GOP is a sick and insane party Good argument. Persuasive as fuck.
The GOP is a sick and insane party Good argument. Persuasive as fuck. The sick part is mostly loyalty to an idiotic dictator. The insane part is partly pretending to be conservative while running up the deficit recklessly with unsound plans.
