How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/jobs-report-june-2019.html
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. Liar
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying...
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Moreover, the trains are running on time too.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint. I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint. I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't. Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint. I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't. Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes. The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint. I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't. Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes. The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob. The working class got a tax cut. Idiot.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint. I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't. Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes. The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob. The working class got a tax cut. Idiot. Hondo wants tax cuts to go to people who already don’t pay any income taxes
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? But they won’t.
How is that bad news Mike?Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm. But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes. Neither has happened. As always. So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....Keep beating that retarded drum retard. Keep lying... Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike. Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep. If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right? If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity? Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint. I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't. Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes. The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob. The working class got a tax cut. Idiot. Yes I'm sure that $18 a month was meaningful. Good thing we won the war in China and the tariffs didn't increase prices. That being said. I'll tell you one last time. The vast majority of the tax cut went to the wealthy. A point you ignore. Idiot.
