What I'm hearing about the top team in the PAC, 11-2 Top 10!

CFetters_Nacho_Lover · August 2019

UWhuskytskeet said:
Still Apples an Oranges Comparison.

Pretty Much Almost Nobody, No Pac 12 team, etc, has LOST(NOT games) as Much EXPERIENCE, and maybe might even Talent, with as LITTLE replacing that, in the last about 2,3,4 years, then the fuskies have since from the end of last year to the beginning of this coming season.

If that had happened to WSU, Ore St, etc, even with a Leach, Peterson type coach, that would be a 3,4,5,6,7 win team for either WSU, Ore St.

And before you say that that happened to WSU this year, That didnt happen to WSU this year.

WSU hasnt LOST(Not games) even close to as much as the Fuskies have this year. And even if it were close, WSU has done a pretty good job of REPLACING what they have lost.

And the fuskies have not done a good job of, and have done a bad job of replacing what they have lost ON PAPER.

And there is a limit to Plug and Play, and Plug and Play will only go so far.

And because of all that, since WSU, Ore St would only win about 3,4,5,6,7 games if they were in the fuskies shoes this season, and since the fuskies, have a traditionally better program, to the point that the fuskies would win about 5,6 5.5 games at minimum, to about 8,9, 8.5 games at maximum, in the situation they are in, instead of the 3 to 7 win range WSU, Ore St would get in their shoes, this season.

So the fuskies winning about 5,6, 5.5 to about 8,9,8.5 games is pretty realistic, based on above.

And WSU winning about 7,8,9, ave 8 wins at minimum to about 9,10, 11, ave 10 wins at maximum, with 6,7 games at worst, with only 4,5 wins almost impossible(.000001% chance), is pretty realistic.

Why?

Because WSU has a better team ON PAPER, then the fuskies this season, and have not lost(not games), as much as the fuskies, and have replaced what they have lost better, and have more TALENT, EXPERIENCE, DEPTH, ETC, then the fuskies do this season ON PAPER.

And when you, others say how can WSU be better when they lost to the fuskies? thats wrong to say, think that.

Doesnt matter in a way that WSU lost to fuskies.

WSU was 11-2 last year. Fuskies won about 8,9 games last year. WSU won their bowl game. Fuskies lost their bowl game.

So WSU was the better team, record wise, talent, etc, DESPITE losing to the fuskies.

And the ONLY reason why Fuskies even won that game is because they GOT LUCKY, SNOW, ICE, etc.

And before anybody says "But the fuskies had to play in that too", everybody should know that playing in SNOW, ICE, FAVORS the kind of team the fuskies have, over the kind of team WSU is, has.

So WSU was the better team last season then the fuskies.

And WSU is the better team then the fuskies, this season, no matter what happens vs the fuskies.

And because of that WSU's win range is 1,2, 2.5 wins on both the low side, high side then the fuskies

So that means that the fuskies win about 5,6, 5.5 games at minimum to about 8,9, 8.5 wins at maximum, and about 7 wins at average

And WSU should win about 6,7, 8, ave of 7 games at minimum, to about 9,10,11, ave of 10 games at maximum, and about 8.5 games at average, which is also their over, under.

Thats realistic, Logical

I’m trying to translate this but Google doesn’t have a retard Cuog to English option. Can someone help? I feel like @SECDAWG or @puppylove_sugarsteel would understand this but I’m not sure I’d understand their interpretation

ToiletSeat · August 2019

I'll just wait for SAC to straighten this out.

UW_Doog_Bot · August 2019

UWhuskytskeet said:
Still Apples an Oranges Comparison.

Pretty Much Almost Nobody, No Pac 12 team, etc, has LOST(NOT games) as Much EXPERIENCE, and maybe might even Talent, with as LITTLE replacing that, in the last about 2,3,4 years, then the fuskies have since from the end of last year to the beginning of this coming season.

If that had happened to WSU, Ore St, etc, even with a Leach, Peterson type coach, that would be a 3,4,5,6,7 win team for either WSU, Ore St.

And before you say that that happened to WSU this year, That didnt happen to WSU this year.

WSU hasnt LOST(Not games) even close to as much as the Fuskies have this year. And even if it were close, WSU has done a pretty good job of REPLACING what they have lost.

And the fuskies have not done a good job of, and have done a bad job of replacing what they have lost ON PAPER.

And there is a limit to Plug and Play, and Plug and Play will only go so far.

And because of all that, since WSU, Ore St would only win about 3,4,5,6,7 games if they were in the fuskies shoes this season, and since the fuskies, have a traditionally better program, to the point that the fuskies would win about 5,6 5.5 games at minimum, to about 8,9, 8.5 games at maximum, in the situation they are in, instead of the 3 to 7 win range WSU, Ore St would get in their shoes, this season.

So the fuskies winning about 5,6, 5.5 to about 8,9,8.5 games is pretty realistic, based on above.

And WSU winning about 7,8,9, ave 8 wins at minimum to about 9,10, 11, ave 10 wins at maximum, with 6,7 games at worst, with only 4,5 wins almost impossible(.000001% chance), is pretty realistic.

Why?

Because WSU has a better team ON PAPER, then the fuskies this season, and have not lost(not games), as much as the fuskies, and have replaced what they have lost better, and have more TALENT, EXPERIENCE, DEPTH, ETC, then the fuskies do this season ON PAPER.

And when you, others say how can WSU be better when they lost to the fuskies? thats wrong to say, think that.

Doesnt matter in a way that WSU lost to fuskies.

WSU was 11-2 last year. Fuskies won about 8,9 games last year. WSU won their bowl game. Fuskies lost their bowl game.

So WSU was the better team, record wise, talent, etc, DESPITE losing to the fuskies.

And the ONLY reason why Fuskies even won that game is because they GOT LUCKY, SNOW, ICE, etc.

And before anybody says "But the fuskies had to play in that too", everybody should know that playing in SNOW, ICE, FAVORS the kind of team the fuskies have, over the kind of team WSU is, has.

So WSU was the better team last season then the fuskies.

And WSU is the better team then the fuskies, this season, no matter what happens vs the fuskies.

And because of that WSU's win range is 1,2, 2.5 wins on both the low side, high side then the fuskies

So that means that the fuskies win about 5,6, 5.5 games at minimum to about 8,9, 8.5 wins at maximum, and about 7 wins at average

And WSU should win about 6,7, 8, ave of 7 games at minimum, to about 9,10,11, ave of 10 games at maximum, and about 8.5 games at average, which is also their over, under.

Thats realistic, Logical

God I love the CUOG!