Dems meeting tommorow on impeachment. Pelosi to have dinner with Trump in evening
Comments
-
A victory for small governmentCirrhosisDawg said:Sounds like another Infrastructure Week has fallen apart. Sad.
-
SFGbob said:
I'm more than happy to address your facts. In fact I have addressed your facts. There is no evidence that Papadopoulos conspired with any Russians for any dirt on Hillary. That is a fact that you ignore. There is no evidence that Mifsud is a Russian agent but there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that he is either an FBI or CIA asset.ApostleofGrief said:Post-truth politics (also called post-factual politics and post-reality politics) is a political culture in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored. Post-truth differs from traditional contesting and falsifying of facts by relegating facts and expert opinions to be of secondary importance relative to appeal to emotion. While this has been described as a contemporary problem, some observers have described it as a long-standing part of political life that was less notable before the advent of the Internet and related social changes.
SINCE YOU DON'T LIKE THE FACTS IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE A DEBATE
Like I posted many times and you ignored it -- this "offer" to access the "less redacted" report came with conditions: they couldn't discuss the contents, which renders it useless and an insulting offer. These committees often look at classified materials, you know. Most of your lame arguments about redactions futz over that issue.SFGbob said:Barr offered access to a less-redacted version of the report to just 12 members of Congress — six Democrats and six Republicans. But as of Tuesday afternoon, only Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, opted to view it. A third, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he planned to review the report later Tuesday.
-
THE INVESTIGATIONS *****STARTED ******** BECAUSE OF A TIPOFF FROM AUSTRALIAN INTELLIGENCE. So, that's why it started. That was the first cause. That was the probable cause. So if you want to talk about why it started, it was because of a tipoff from Australian intelligence. Why did it start? Was it a dossier? No, it was because of a tipoff from Australian intelligence. No matter how many red herrings you throw out, the probable cause was again, A TIP OFF FROM AUSTRALIAN INTELLIGENCE IN 2016 BEFORE THE DOSSIER WAS AVAILABLE.RaceBannon said:
McCabe said no dossier no warrantApostleofGrief said:I've posted links to articles from bona fide news sources which negate your contentions: 1) that Hillary's dossier started the FBI investigation (NY Times link), 2) that Democrats can see the unredacted report (see Reuters, this is false). Both points #1 and #2 are just false.
Inconvenient fact for you right there -
so I'm done with this thread for now, you guys can resume your post truth bullshit arguments and Fox state news spins.
Have a happy day -
At least the Dems can now get back to passing important legislation for the country.
Or not. -
Lightweight conspiritardApostleofGrief said:so I'm done with this thread for now, you guys can resume your post truth bullshit arguments and Fox state news spins.
Have a happy day -
No dossier no warrantApostleofGrief said:
THE INVESTIGATIONS *****STARTED ******** BECAUSE OF A TIPOFF FROM AUSTRALIAN INTELLIGENCE. So, that's why it started. That was the first cause. That was the probable cause. So if you want to talk about why it started, it was because of a tipoff from Australian intelligence. Why did it start? Was it a dossier? No, it was because of a tipoff from Australian intelligence. No matter how many red herrings you throw out, the probable cause was again, A TIP OFF FROM AUSTRALIAN INTELLIGENCE IN 2016 BEFORE THE DOSSIER WAS AVAILABLE.RaceBannon said:
McCabe said no dossier no warrantApostleofGrief said:I've posted links to articles from bona fide news sources which negate your contentions: 1) that Hillary's dossier started the FBI investigation (NY Times link), 2) that Democrats can see the unredacted report (see Reuters, this is false). Both points #1 and #2 are just false.
Inconvenient fact for you right there
It started on a fake tip to Popadopulous
I posted that. You don't care. Facts mean nothing to you conspiritard -
Trump bailed on infrastructure talks today. You know, one of his legislative priorities. Presidential as always.Dude61 said:At least the Dems can now get back to passing important legislation for the country.
Or not. -
Nothing says I lost better than going with a fat joke.CirrhosisDawg said:
Surprised he’s not in the trump administration. He’d “fit” in well! 😂 !1!!1SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you're go to slam on Barr and Trump for that matter is that they are fat. Unless you're their wives or doctors I'm not sure why you'd care, but when a photo of Nadler is posted, your fucking hero who you claimed could do anything he wanted, where the guy looks like fucking Humpty Dumpty you cry like a bitch.CirrhosisDawg said:
Go back to ass tongueing Bob Barr GayBob.SFGbob said:
The "joke" was lame the first time you told it Kunt.CirrhosisDawg said:
Bob barr’s Belly and I are laughing in the media room.RaceBannon said:I heard EXONERATED
And I'll remind you that Nadler has had gastric bypass surgery. He used to be an even fatter ballooned faced blow hard.
-
Good for himCirrhosisDawg said:
Trump bailed on infrastructure talks today. You know, one of his legislative priorities. Presidential as always.Dude61 said:At least the Dems can now get back to passing important legislation for the country.
Or not.
