Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Here we go again

RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
The democrats aren't done claiming the 2016 election was stolen and are already claiming that Trump will delegitimatize the 2020 election if he loses. Like the democrats are still doing about 2016. Talking points are already out that there is plenty of proof against Trump even if Mueller didn't find it.

You can't make this shit up

https://cnn.com/2019/03/06/politics/donald-trump-2020-election-illegitimate/index.html
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,156 Standard Supporter
    The fuck does 'de-legitimize' mean?

    You either win or you don't.

    Does Hillary Rodham Clinton want some fucking participation ribbon?

    De-legitimize? Christ.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    PurpleThrobber said:

    The fuck does 'de-legitimize' mean?

    You either win or you don't.

    Does Hillary Rodham Clinton want some fucking participation ribbon?

    De-legitimize? Christ.


    Seems problematic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,205
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    Well one is based in fact and the other is bullshit repeated on the number 1 news talk show.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    Well one is based in fact and the other is bullshit repeated on the number 1 news talk show.
    Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.

    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    Fact?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,205
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    Well one is based in fact and the other is bullshit repeated on the number 1 news talk show.
    Hondo holds Hannity to a higher standard than Hillary. Why did the WaPo give Hillary’s “facts” 4 Pinocchio’s Hondo?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    Hannity's lead as #1 is small and at times Maddow beats him in ratings

    We need to be precise


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    Well one is based in fact and the other is bullshit repeated on the number 1 news talk show.
    Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.

    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    Fact?
    Yes race. You got me. Hillary lying about voter registration in Georgia is worse than hannity lying about a pizza gate or Seth Rich.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,205
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    Well one is based in fact and the other is bullshit repeated on the number 1 news talk show.
    Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.

    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    Fact?
    Yes race. You got me. Hillary lying about voter registration in Georgia is worse than hannity lying about a pizza gate or Seth Rich.
    I thought you said that what Hillary said was a "fact" Hondo? What's it like being a pathological liar?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    https://foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-fact-checks-hillary-clinton-on-voter-suppression-claims

    The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.

    “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”

    “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

    “Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.



    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    I thought the Washington Post is liberal. Are you saying they are eating their own?
    Hey Hondo would you say that your party's Presidential Candidate's conspiracy theories about black voter suppression are worse than or equal to an anonymous message board poster's comments about Pizzagate or Seth Rich?
    Well one is based in fact and the other is bullshit repeated on the number 1 news talk show.
    Just think about it: Between 2012, the prior presidential election where we still had the Voting Rights Act, and 2016, when my name was on the ballot, there were fewer voters registered in Georgia than there had been those prior four years,” Clinton told the audience.

    The Post responded that “Clinton’s claim that total voter registration declined in that state from 2012 to 2016 is false; it increased.”

    Fact?
    Yes race. You got me. Hillary lying about voter registration in Georgia is worse than hannity lying about a pizza gate or Seth Rich.
    It is
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,205
    So I guess Hondo isn't going to tell us why he called Hillary's lie a "fact." Funny how Hondo has tried to hold me responsible for people who talk about Seth Rich, when I've never said a word about it, but when Hillary tells blatant lies about blacks being turned away at the polls Hondo calls it a "fact" and takes no responsibility for it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,756
    PurpleThrobber said:

    The fuck does 'de-legitimize' mean?

    You either win or you don't.

    Does Hillary Rodham Clinton want some fucking participation ribbon?

    De-legitimize? Christ.


    You don't understand "legitimacy"? Did you go to college?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    So I guess Hondo isn't going to tell us why he called Hillary's lie a "fact." Funny how Hondo has tried to hold me responsible for people who talk about Seth Rich, when I've never said a word about it, but when Hillary tells blatant lies about blacks being turned away at the polls Hondo calls it a "fact" and takes no responsibility for it.

    If you can't see the difference between someone bitching and lying about voter rolls. And someone outright making up lies calling someone a murderer and kingpin of a child sex ring. I can't help you. Fuck you are stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,843 Standard Supporter
    Hillary and company said Trump wouldn't accept the results of the election. As usual they were just projecting their own beliefs onto Trump.

    That bitch has collusioned and whined since she got whooped. Obozo as well as all the dems. Now we know the collusion story, which is the invention of Hillary, is as bogus as the rest of their BS.

    Now the left wants to investigate every aspect of Trumps life because they couldn't find anything.

    Communists suck!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Hillary and company said Trump wouldn't accept the results of the election. As usual they were just projecting their own beliefs onto Trump.

    That bitch has collusioned and whined since she got whooped. Obozo as well as all the dems. Now we know the collusion story, which is the invention of Hillary, is as bogus as the rest of their BS.

    Now the left wants to investigate every aspect of Trumps life because they couldn't find anything.

    Communists suck!

    Da fuq are you talking about? This was on live TV.

    https://youtu.be/cP0G4vJ5OMw
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Hillary and company said Trump wouldn't accept the results of the election. As usual they were just projecting their own beliefs onto Trump.

    That bitch has collusioned and whined since she got whooped. Obozo as well as all the dems. Now we know the collusion story, which is the invention of Hillary, is as bogus as the rest of their BS.

    Now the left wants to investigate every aspect of Trumps life because they couldn't find anything.

    Communists suck!

    Da fuq are you talking about? This was on live TV.

    https://youtu.be/cP0G4vJ5OMw
    Each side flips their stories on Election Day. Completely crass by both.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.