https://www.davidgumpert.com/hot-alternative-doc-cowan-censured-ca-medical-authoritiesCan you find a single doctor that spouts this nonsense without something like this on his resume? Oh right, it’s giant conspiracy by the medical establishment. We also didn’t land on the moon, climate change isn’t real and the moon landing was faked. Derp.
Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument. Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong. You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio? https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too.
Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument. Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong. You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio? https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too. Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable.
Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument. Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong. You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio? https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too. Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable. A scientist can have an agenda and then they have to get their research peer reviewed. And then anyone can read it. And then other scientists can test it and try and reproduce the results. Why can’t anyone do that with the horrible risks of vaccines? Oh right, it’s the biggest conspiracy in human history. But I’m the one that needs to grow up.
Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument. Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong. You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio? https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too. Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable. A scientist can have an agenda and then they have to get their research peer reviewed. And then anyone can read it. And then other scientists can test it and try and reproduce the results. Why can’t anyone do that with the horrible risks of vaccines? Oh right, it’s the biggest conspiracy in human history. But I’m the one that needs to grow up. South dog thinks the conspiracy is with scientists. And that political pundits and politicians don't have an agenda, are truthful about vaccines, and know more than scientists.
Hahaha you fuckers are stupid and crazy and filled with Russian propaganda. lolololChrist. Oh well, I guess this is what 25 years of Limbaugh and Fox do to you.God you guys are hysterical. Holy fuck - vaccine truthers???? lofl lololololololololololol
