Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. If you dare criticize Jimmy Lake, you won't last long.

Deserves own thread

13

Comments

  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    greenblood
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    Popping off? Sure, I'll wait to do that until we win something meaningful.

    Talking shit on the rest of the conference whose only comeback to us winning it is, "Well, we all suck! So there!" I will continue to enjoy that until I can't. The tallest midget still gets to punch down when talking to the other midgets.
    I'm just repeating what I was taught for years and years.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary
    haie said:

    @creepycoug

    You quoted me twice. That's an automatic acceptance of defeat.

    That's bored rules. Look it up

    😆😉😊😎😃😉😆

    I don't follow the board rules. I thought you knew that. Sad.
    haie
  • greenbloodgreenblood Posts: 9,399
    10,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 5000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    Surprised?
    creepycoug
  • haiehaie Posts: 7,515
    5,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 5000 Comments 250 Answers

    haie said:

    @creepycoug

    You quoted me twice. That's an automatic acceptance of defeat.

    That's bored rules. Look it up

    😆😉😊😎😃😉😆

    You’re funnier on the Blazer thread
    Obviously
    creepycouggreenbloodbackthepack
  • haiehaie Posts: 7,515
    5,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 5000 Comments 250 Answers

    haie said:

    @creepycoug

    You quoted me twice. That's an automatic acceptance of defeat.

    That's bored rules. Look it up

    😆😉😊😎😃😉😆

    I don't follow the board rules. I thought you knew that. Sad.
    You are the bored rebel after all with your multiple UW degrees and complete coonism.

    I didn't turn on my school despite graduating during the Ty Holocaust.
    creepycougbackthepack
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary
    haie said:

    haie said:

    @creepycoug

    You quoted me twice. That's an automatic acceptance of defeat.

    That's bored rules. Look it up

    😆😉😊😎😃😉😆

    I don't follow the board rules. I thought you knew that. Sad.
    You are the bored rebel after all with your multiple UW degrees and complete coonism.

    I didn't turn on my school despite graduating during the Ty Holocaust.
    Racist!!!
    haieUW_Doog_Botbackthepack
  • BallzBallz Posts: 4,739
    2,500 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
  • FirePeteFirePete Posts: 13,030
    10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments 250 Answers
    This thread delivers aids very efficiently
    creepycougbackthepack
  • greenbloodgreenblood Posts: 9,399
    10,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 5000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    This thread delivers aids very efficiently

    SAC is the new and improved Charlie Sheen of HH
    creepycoug
  • greenbloodgreenblood Posts: 9,399
    10,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 5000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    So you concede, good to know
    creepycoug
  • haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    image
    creepycouggreenbloodbackthepack
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    Let me break it down further for you. Your post made no sense. And your current iteration of it makes no sense.
  • BallzBallz Posts: 4,739
    2,500 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers
    edited March 6

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    Let me break it down further for you. Your post made no sense. And your current iteration of it makes no sense.
    You still don't understand because you're that retarded. Not surprising.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    Let me break it down further for you. Your post made no sense. And your current iteration of it makes no sense.
    You still don't understand because you're that retarded. Not surprising.
    No. You still don't understand that your response made no sense. I don't know why you don't understand why your own work product made no sense. It could be because you're stupid.

    In any event, sad.
  • salemcoogsalemcoog Posts: 10,130
    5,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments 250 Answers

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    Of course you would think that way. Us quooks didn't get to pop off here until Chip won the Rose Bowl, and that was after a Rose Bowl loss and a trip to the Title Game. So no, two conference titles in three years means absolutely dick unless you win the game after that. And, no I will not be popping off if Cristobal wins the North. I expect him to win the North every year from here on out, and if he doesn't, it's a disappointment. It also won't mean anything unless he wins a major bowl. You might want to hold your team to the same standard.
    Then you're gonna be disappointed every season. :D

    Since when do conference championships not give someone the right to pop off? Can I pop off at Ohio State or Bama fans? No. Can I pop off at other Pac-12 fans? All day long bitch. Better luck next year.
    Bragging about being a bridesmaid is always special
    Bridesmaid to whom? Ohio State? Clemson? Only one team is truly satisfied at the end of the season. However, the vast majority of teams across the nation haven't won a conference championship in decades. Two conference titles in three years ain't nothing to dismiss, especially when your team was one of the eleven losers those seasons. Oregon hasn't won shit since Mariota left. Bet you didn't see that coming. Get used to it.
    Teams that lose their bowl games are not satisfied.
  • BallzBallz Posts: 4,739
    2,500 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers
    salemcoog said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    Of course you would think that way. Us quooks didn't get to pop off here until Chip won the Rose Bowl, and that was after a Rose Bowl loss and a trip to the Title Game. So no, two conference titles in three years means absolutely dick unless you win the game after that. And, no I will not be popping off if Cristobal wins the North. I expect him to win the North every year from here on out, and if he doesn't, it's a disappointment. It also won't mean anything unless he wins a major bowl. You might want to hold your team to the same standard.
    Then you're gonna be disappointed every season. :D

    Since when do conference championships not give someone the right to pop off? Can I pop off at Ohio State or Bama fans? No. Can I pop off at other Pac-12 fans? All day long bitch. Better luck next year.
    Bragging about being a bridesmaid is always special
    Bridesmaid to whom? Ohio State? Clemson? Only one team is truly satisfied at the end of the season. However, the vast majority of teams across the nation haven't won a conference championship in decades. Two conference titles in three years ain't nothing to dismiss, especially when your team was one of the eleven losers those seasons. Oregon hasn't won shit since Mariota left. Bet you didn't see that coming. Get used to it.
    Teams that lose their bowl games are not satisfied.
    I'd rather win the Apple Cup and conference championship game than some loser bowl game nobody cares about. But that's just me.
    6-0.
    haiebackthepack
  • BallzBallz Posts: 4,739
    2,500 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    Let me break it down further for you. Your post made no sense. And your current iteration of it makes no sense.
    Better luck next year losers.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 12,147
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    Let me break it down further for you. Your post made no sense. And your current iteration of it makes no sense.
    Better luck next year losers.
    Embarrassing. It's always clear when this place starts to frustrate you. Your posts start to look like that ^. Sad. Sad, really.

  • BallzBallz Posts: 4,739
    2,500 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Somewhere, @Mosster47 watched an 8-4 duck team he predicted would win the conference barely squeak by a redtube bowl, have its best coach leave, get UW balls wiped on his face while we went to the rose, and *now* watches his beloved cats go 16-12 and drop basketball while my daWgs run the conference.


    LOLOLOL

    When Petersen wins more than a Heart of Dallas Bowel you can pop off.

    I feel like two conference championships in three years gives us a right to pop off. When Cristobal wins the North division you can pop off. Till then, we the boss.
    I feel like popping off about winning this shit hole conference is technically allowed, but still sad. Sad, really. At least that's what I heard (a lot) when Oregon was winning it, and it's only worse now.

    If Oregon ever wins the North again and starts popping off, some quook can find a picture of the NW Championship T-shirt and go with your routine.

    And if any of you ever see me popping off if Miami ever wins the Coastal division of the ACC, please promise me you'll track me down and shoot me, and spare me the shame of my then- @StrongArmCobra existence.
    1. When Oregon was winning the conference what did UW and WSU look like? How about Cal? The North division is way more competitive than it was back then. It used to be a two team division between Stanford and Oregon. Now it's 5-deep of teams that are capable of beating each other on any given Saturday. UW is way better. WSU is way better. Cal is way better and all of a sudden play defense now. Get your facts straight. During Oregon's golden era under Chip Kelly, their only competition was Stanford. Win that game and the rest was a cake walk. That's what walking all over a shit conference looks like.

    2. You degrading the Pac-12 in an attempt to degrade UW's conference championship only makes Oregon look worse for not winning it themselves with the the so-called #1 NFL QB prospect in the nation and a veteran team running the same system they were in 2017.
    When Chip was coaching Oregon the conference was definitely top heavy. We really aren’t even very top heavy anymore. UW is the best team in the conference, but even they are a step behind those Oregon and Stanford teams. Everybody else is about the same as they were then. This conference hasn’t been good top to bottom since the early 2000s
    Those Oregon and Stanford teams aren't beating Alabama, Penn St, and tOSU either. Oregon couldn't even keep it close with buckeye backups.

    That "step" is based on games against crab legs FSU, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas St, dooging or not.

    Only similarity is Oregon, Furd, and UW have all drawn weak P12CCG opponents from the south.
    That FSU team was a season removed from a national title and pretty much still in tact. If Washington had done that to them, that is exactly what you'd be saying. That is dooging.

    That Wisconsin team was led by Russell Wilson and Monte Ball. 4th in the nation in scoring and giving up 17 ppg. Let's not pretend that the flawed Ohio State Team, and even last year's Penn State team, were on some other level from those teams. That's hard dooging. Russell and Wisky could have beaten them both rather easily.

    I will give you Bama, and I will take back the Buck team that beat Oregon in the title game. That was a very, very big boy running team with a stout defensive line. That Ohio State team would have KILLED you in the Rose Bowl. And you know it, because a Buck Light version of them essentially killed you in the Rose Bowl but for a fourth quarter nap they took.

    Crab legs refers to Winston being a jack ass, which everybody knows he was. Nobody has ever used that to suggest that FSU wasn't good. They were good. The game got away from them a bit, and I would agree that some key Seminole mistakes made the disparity look worse than it actually was, but Oregon went in and straight up beat them. Like it or not, Pete does not yet have a win like that under his belt.

    Someone would have to go year by year during Oregon's run, but a check on 2014 showed 6 conference teams in the final top 25. 2018 had 2. The conference may not have been great, but it has become progressively worse.

    And don't forget your own rule: the pac 12 sucks when USC is down. They down baby. They down.
    You're mad because I tell it how it is and you tell it how it used to be.
    That response makes no sense.
    I'll dumb it down for you. I tell it how it is right now (UW reigning Pac-12 champs) and all you can do is tell it how it used to be in the past when Oregon was good. Stop living in the past.
    Let me break it down further for you. Your post made no sense. And your current iteration of it makes no sense.
    Better luck next year losers.
    Embarrassing. It's always clear when this place starts to frustrate you. Your posts start to look like that ^. Sad. Sad, really.

    Mighty fast response. You must have no life.
    backthepack
Sign In or Register to comment.