Jaden McDaniels is draft eligible?!?
Comments
-
Done.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Give me my original WTF back. No take backsies.Domicillo said:Y
Must’ve accidentally fat fingered the WTF’d on your initial. Intentionally WTF’d your next post for giving a shit about it.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agree with what I say, type out a paragraph expanding on my points, and still WTFing my post.Domicillo said:
There's no way they can do a three year mandate in basketball. It's the one sport that's proven to have a significant enough number of kids ready to play and contribute immediately on a yearly basis. It works for baseball because there is no chance an 18 year pops into the majors immediately, so kids decide to take an investment in college in hopes that they can develop enough to sped up their grind to the majors on the backend. It works in football, because 99.99% of kids aren't physically developed enough to immediately go from homecoming court to the NFL. There isn't the same incentive to mandate three years in college in basketball. Are there kids who benefit every year from going to college, sure, but its not to the point where college basketball is developing more 3 or 4 year college players who turn into NBA starters than one-an-done kids who become starters.theknowledge said:I had a feeling that Zion blowing out his shoe/knee would lead to something pretty quickly. Kid is probably one of the ten most important basketball players in the world and he hurt himself in a Duke game. Let kids like him go get paid, let the others that want to bypass college make a modest living in the d league and the rest commit to play three years of college ball before turning pro. Everyone eats.
#justmoderatorthings -
You had a chin before I saw that self chinning shit.Domicillo said:
Done.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Give me my original WTF back. No take backsies.Domicillo said:Y
Must’ve accidentally fat fingered the WTF’d on your initial. Intentionally WTF’d your next post for giving a shit about it.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agree with what I say, type out a paragraph expanding on my points, and still WTFing my post.Domicillo said:
There's no way they can do a three year mandate in basketball. It's the one sport that's proven to have a significant enough number of kids ready to play and contribute immediately on a yearly basis. It works for baseball because there is no chance an 18 year pops into the majors immediately, so kids decide to take an investment in college in hopes that they can develop enough to sped up their grind to the majors on the backend. It works in football, because 99.99% of kids aren't physically developed enough to immediately go from homecoming court to the NFL. There isn't the same incentive to mandate three years in college in basketball. Are there kids who benefit every year from going to college, sure, but its not to the point where college basketball is developing more 3 or 4 year college players who turn into NBA starters than one-an-done kids who become starters.theknowledge said:I had a feeling that Zion blowing out his shoe/knee would lead to something pretty quickly. Kid is probably one of the ten most important basketball players in the world and he hurt himself in a Duke game. Let kids like him go get paid, let the others that want to bypass college make a modest living in the d league and the rest commit to play three years of college ball before turning pro. Everyone eats.
#justmoderatorthings
ROTNAH -
Agree, but I don’t really care about what’s fair. College basketball would get way better if they had to stay for three years.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I doubt the NBA would implement the three year rule. Or at least I hope not, since that would just further persuade kids to bypass college ball altogether. The Dejounte Murrays of the league who don’t have huge NBA prospects out of high school but emerge in their freshman year should still have the option to immediately capitalize on that. Reduce but don’t eliminate one-and-dones.theknowledge said:I had a feeling that Zion blowing out his shoe/knee would lead to something pretty quickly. Kid is probably one of the ten most important basketball players in the world and he hurt himself in a Duke game. Let kids like him go get paid, let the others that want to bypass college make a modest living in the d league and the rest commit to play three years of college ball before turning pro. Everyone eats.
-
Maybe but that is a tiny fraction of his earnings potential.rustysavage said:Zion has 28 million worth of insurance that Duke pays for
-
His primary employer Nike gonna make amends for the blowout with a 300 mily contract anyways.EwaDawg said:
Maybe but that is a tiny fraction of his earnings potential.rustysavage said:Zion has 28 million worth of insurance that Duke pays for
-
One thing I'll disagree on. The current one and done rule helps the schools that aren't power houses. There's a reason Kentucky rarely makes the final four. Teams that develop talent over 3-4 years have an advantage. Duke even does it that way.RoadDawg55 said:
Agree, but I don’t really care about what’s fair. College basketball would get way better if they had to stay for three years.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I doubt the NBA would implement the three year rule. Or at least I hope not, since that would just further persuade kids to bypass college ball altogether. The Dejounte Murrays of the league who don’t have huge NBA prospects out of high school but emerge in their freshman year should still have the option to immediately capitalize on that. Reduce but don’t eliminate one-and-dones.theknowledge said:I had a feeling that Zion blowing out his shoe/knee would lead to something pretty quickly. Kid is probably one of the ten most important basketball players in the world and he hurt himself in a Duke game. Let kids like him go get paid, let the others that want to bypass college make a modest living in the d league and the rest commit to play three years of college ball before turning pro. Everyone eats.
-
Duke has become a lot more Kentucky the last five years. NC seems to be a team that always has skilled juniors and seniors peppered throughout their line-up. Coincidentally they have been a really consistent tourney team the last fifteen years with three titles, one runner up, five final fours, two elite eights and one sweet sixteen. The flip side is when you are at times young or lacking that real star power you get knocked out in the second round five times in that span as well. Pros and cons to everything but if you're Washington the NC blueprint is the way you compete and win big in the tournament.2001400ex said:
One thing I'll disagree on. The current one and done rule helps the schools that aren't power houses. There's a reason Kentucky rarely makes the final four. Teams that develop talent over 3-4 years have an advantage.RoadDawg55 said:
Agree, but I don’t really care about what’s fair. College basketball would get way better if they had to stay for three years.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I doubt the NBA would implement the three year rule. Or at least I hope not, since that would just further persuade kids to bypass college ball altogether. The Dejounte Murrays of the league who don’t have huge NBA prospects out of high school but emerge in their freshman year should still have the option to immediately capitalize on that. Reduce but don’t eliminate one-and-dones.theknowledge said:I had a feeling that Zion blowing out his shoe/knee would lead to something pretty quickly. Kid is probably one of the ten most important basketball players in the world and he hurt himself in a Duke game. Let kids like him go get paid, let the others that want to bypass college make a modest living in the d league and the rest commit to play three years of college ball before turning pro. Everyone eats.
DukeNorth Carolina even does it that way. -
Yeah I'll agree with that. I don't know that UW will consistently pull in the talent that NC does. But it's very underrated signing and developing 3-4 year guys. And that's what Hopkins has done so far. Next year will be interesting with the freshmen studs.theknowledge said:
Duke has become a lot more Kentucky the last five years. NC seems to be a team that always has skilled juniors and seniors peppered throughout their line-up. Coincidentally they have been a really consistent tourney team the last fifteen years with three titles, one runner up, five final fours, two elite eights and one sweet sixteen. The flip side is when you are at times young or lacking that real star power you get knocked out in the second round five times in that span as well. Pros and cons to everything but if you're Washington the NC blueprint is the way you compete and win big in the tournament.2001400ex said:
One thing I'll disagree on. The current one and done rule helps the schools that aren't power houses. There's a reason Kentucky rarely makes the final four. Teams that develop talent over 3-4 years have an advantage.RoadDawg55 said:
Agree, but I don’t really care about what’s fair. College basketball would get way better if they had to stay for three years.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I doubt the NBA would implement the three year rule. Or at least I hope not, since that would just further persuade kids to bypass college ball altogether. The Dejounte Murrays of the league who don’t have huge NBA prospects out of high school but emerge in their freshman year should still have the option to immediately capitalize on that. Reduce but don’t eliminate one-and-dones.theknowledge said:I had a feeling that Zion blowing out his shoe/knee would lead to something pretty quickly. Kid is probably one of the ten most important basketball players in the world and he hurt himself in a Duke game. Let kids like him go get paid, let the others that want to bypass college make a modest living in the d league and the rest commit to play three years of college ball before turning pro. Everyone eats.
DukeNorth Carolina even does it that way.






