Covington student sues Washington Post for $250 million

TurdBomber

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

More punchable than you, fatso?

That kid would pulverize you and you know it.

HHusky

TurdBomber said:

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

More punchable than you, fatso?

That kid would pulverize you and you know it.

Triggered

NorthwestFresh

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

Meltdown

HHusky

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

Meltdown

Irony

TurdBomber

HHusky said:

TurdBomber said:

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

More punchable than you, fatso?

That kid would pulverize you and you know it.

Triggered

Hahahaha. How long has it been since you've seen it, Fatso? 10 years? 20?

NorthwestFresh

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

Meltdown

Irony

“May have”
“Probably”
“seems likely”
“it may have just been”

As I said, meltdown. No “seems likely” about it.

HHusky

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

Meltdown

Irony

“May have”
“Probably”
“seems likely”
“it may have just been”

As I said, meltdown. No “seems likely” about it.

Qualifying words that concede we can’t know some things without information scare you Boris?

NorthwestFresh

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

Meltdown

Irony

“May have”
“Probably”
“seems likely”
“it may have just been”

As I said, meltdown. No “seems likely” about it.

Qualifying words that concede we can’t know some things without information scare you Boris?

Are you referring to the opinions you are pulling out of your ass during this latest meltdown?

MikeDamone

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

The white flag routine . . .

I’m not laughing with you . . .

How many more days are you going to wallow in being wrong?

Don’t you still post about coronavirus occasionally*?

* All the time.

Of course. Because I like mocking you and never miss a chance to rub me being right in your face.

MikeDamone

HHusky said:

Well ladies, when the judge allowed three of the 33 allegedly defamatory statements to be revived, he explicitly said discovery could be had as to those statements, mentioning emails explicitly, and the matter could be then be rescheduled for a summary judgment hearing. As I say, the discovery may have revealed evidence of knowledge--which seems likely since WaPo amended its reporting--or it may have just been embarrassing emails about a punchable virgin from Kentucky, well on his way to marrying his sister-cousin. We probably won't know unless the fetus fetishists violate their agreement

Dance monkey, dance.

Desperation is a good look for you.