Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Husky Jacks open thread [2019]

1250251253255256354

Comments

  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739

    dnc said:

    I'm not a bettor but I will be unhappy if UW doesn't cover that spread.

    Say, 58-35?
    45-21
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    I'm not a bettor but I will be unhappy if UW doesn't cover that spread.

    Say, 58-35?
    45-21
    That I could believe
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,458 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    I don't know shit about sports gambling but if there any reason why Washington is -21? Or rather, who thee fuck would bet that?

    Hawaii is bad.

    Washington is good (not great).

    Washington is at home.

    Teams typically tend to play well after a big letdown. Big week of FOCUS, etc.
    Ts and Ps to the HAWKS in Pittsburgh

    Great bored selection as always
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited September 2019

    dnc said:

    I don't know shit about sports gambling but if there any reason why Washington is -21? Or rather, who thee fuck would bet that?

    Hawaii is bad.

    Washington is good (not great).

    Washington is at home.

    Teams typically tend to play well after a big letdown. Big week of FOCUS, etc.
    Ts and Ps to the HAWKS in Pittsburgh

    Great bored selection as always
    I agree.

    Hawks are bad in 10am games. Russ isn't especially good in September. Steelers NEED to prove last week was a fluke. Pete (ILTCPCPTWILTD) never starts 2-0.

    It's not going to be pretty.
  • bigcc
    bigcc Member Posts: 900
    edited September 2019

    I don't know shit about sports gambling but if there any reason why Washington is -21? Or rather, who thee fuck would bet that?

    They gave up 35 points to Arizona in two quarters, recovered for a win but not a good look at home

    First road game of the year, we* are going to be looking to make a statement

    A bunch of dudes on the two rosters know each other, they're going to want to ball out

    I wouldn't take 21 as I think backups are going to get a lot of time, but this isn't cal, I doubt it comes within 8 points after the first quarter... Hopefully

    EDIT: if I knew that Petersen was going to play the starters the whole game (Eason/Ahmed and the OL at least), I'd happily take those odds on a light bet
  • bigcc
    bigcc Member Posts: 900
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    I don't know shit about sports gambling but if there any reason why Washington is -21? Or rather, who thee fuck would bet that?

    Hawaii is bad.

    Washington is good (not great).

    Washington is at home.

    Teams typically tend to play well after a big letdown. Big week of FOCUS, etc.
    Ts and Ps to the HAWKS in Pittsburgh

    Great bored selection as always
    I agree.

    Hawks are bad in 10am games. Russ isn't especially good in September. Steelers NEED to prove last week was a fluke. Pete (ILTCPCPTWILTD) never starts 2-0.

    It's not going to be pretty.
    I agree in the sense that it's going to be ugly football, but if you mean the seahawks are going to be smashed, gonna disagree.

    It'll be a one score game, wouldn't surprise me to see it go either way, but I would definitely put a lean towards the steelers

    If it was week 13 I might change that opinion, but for whatever reason, under Pete it takes a while to get rolling, kind of surprised they pulled out the win vs the Bengals
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,554 Swaye's Wigwam

    Yesterday I poasted quite a bit of stuff from Hugh destroying the offense and the coaching mistakes.

    I didn't want to let the defense off the hook. They fucking sucked too. This is not from Hugh, this is from me.



    - Cal averaged 5.1 yards per carry, only PSU and UCLA had done that to UW's defense over the last 2 years, every other team was UNDER 4 ypc

    - Cal's first half drives:
    5 plays, 30 yards, punt
    3 plays, -11 yards, punt
    3 plays, 4 yards, punt
    5 plays, -2 yards, punt
    7 plays, 69 yards, field goal
    3 plays, -3 yards, punt

    - Cal's second half drives:
    8 plays, 75 yards, touchdown
    11 plays, 73 yards, touchdown
    3 plays, 6 yards, punt
    9 plays, 74 yards, field goal

    - What. Theeeee. Fuck. 3 long sustained drives of 70 plus yards that leads to points. Fucking Cal's offense. What happened at halftime that the coaches couldn't figure out. Or were the players just asleep at the half and never woke up? The missed tackles suggest that latter, the lack of adjustments or removing players fucking up their assignments suggests the former.

    - Fuck you Petersen, fuck you Lake, fuck you missed tackles, fuck you blown coverages, fuck you lost contain, fuck you defensive penalties to extend drives. Fuck all of you. And fuck me for caring so much.





    - Lastly, just to shit on the offense again for good measure, the 4 drives that UW had that were sustained and were 10 plays or more (and 2 went for 70 yards down the field), all 4 drives ended in field goals.

    - Fuck you Petersen, Hamdan, dropped passes, and false starts. Fuck all of you. And fuck me for caring so much.

    So now they decide to make field goals.