Queery #2
Comments
-
What legislation by any party actually benefits Americans?
-
Can’t you just die a slow and gruesome death?
-
So you can't answer the question? Republicans pass bills that help you but Democrats don't. Got it.sarktastic said:Can’t you just die a slow and gruesome death?
-
I get it. Any response you make will expose you for the maroon you are so, you deflect.2001400ex said:What legislation by any party actually benefits Americans?
Surprised you didn't throw out your standard "simple mind" in order to make yourself feel smart.
Why not answer the question as opposed to making yourself look so completely barren of intellect? Afraid of what will happen? In fear of making yourself out to be a bigger buffoon than you already are? -
Hondo knows what happens when he lets go of the side of the kiddie pool.Blu82 said:
I get it. Any response you make will expose you for the maroon you are so, you deflect.2001400ex said:What legislation by any party actually benefits Americans?
Surprised you didn't throw out your standard "simple mind" in order to make yourself feel smart.
Why not answer the question as opposed to making yourself look so completely barren of intellect? Afraid of what will happen? In fear of making yourself out to be a bigger buffoon than you already are?
Glug, glug Hondo. -
I'm thinking that he dove into the gene pool, head first, before accurately assessing the depth of the water.SFGbob said:
Hondo knows what happens when he lets go of the side of the kiddie pool.Blu82 said:
I get it. Any response you make will expose you for the maroon you are so, you deflect.2001400ex said:What legislation by any party actually benefits Americans?
Surprised you didn't throw out your standard "simple mind" in order to make yourself feel smart.
Why not answer the question as opposed to making yourself look so completely barren of intellect? Afraid of what will happen? In fear of making yourself out to be a bigger buffoon than you already are?
Glug, glug Hondo.
He just couldn't help making another worthless response. -
You rang?
-
With Hondo dispensed with, what is holding back the rest of you socialism lovers? All of you should have a multitude of opinions.
I have read pages and pages of criticisms of Trump just on this website.
You surely have answers.
What, you just complained and now have no answers? -
I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
-
California has either one of the highest or the highest rate of poverty of any other state in the Union. Fully one 1/3 of all Welfare cases in the United States live in California.
Remind me again of how California voted for President?
The state is filled with ignorant free loaders, that you fucking support and encourage to be here CD. -
I don’t recall supporting or encouraging you being here GayBob.
-
I'm not on welfare and unlike you I don't encourage deadbeats to come here. You fully support deadbeats coming to America and getting handouts and then you cry like a fucking bitch and blame Trump and Trump supporters.CirrhosisDawg said:I don’t recall supporting or encouraging you being here GayBob.
Heal yourself CD -
Some of us? wish he would just get it over with. Yesterday.sarktastic said:Can’t you just die a slow and gruesome death?
-
Need a wall?CirrhosisDawg said:I don’t recall supporting or encouraging you being here GayBob.
-
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia. -
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off. -
Technically states to have a path to secession. Imagine the United States with the coastal states gone. Would there be any money left to run the rest of the states? But hey! They would have low taxes! I'm sure life would be great, education will boom just like in Kansas.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off. -
So, once again Hondo can't answer the question nor can the lightweight offer any constructive input.2001400ex said:
Technically states to have a path to secession. Imagine the United States with the coastal states gone. Would there be any money left to run the rest of the states? But hey! They would have low taxes! I'm sure life would be great, education will boom just like in Kansas.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
Why don't you put yourself out of our misery. At least Mr. Exploding Liver had something intelligent to offer. -
Ironic.Blu82 said:
So, once again Hondo can't answer the question nor can the lightweight offer any constructive input.2001400ex said:
Technically states to have a path to secession. Imagine the United States with the coastal states gone. Would there be any money left to run the rest of the states? But hey! They would have low taxes! I'm sure life would be great, education will boom just like in Kansas.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
Why don't you put yourself out of our misery. At least Mr. Exploding Liver had something intelligent to offer. -
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all. -
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist. -
Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist. -
We need to build 'The Wall'. I want to see what other ineffective schemes can be dialed up when that one doesn't work.
-
I support local choice and self determination. Not surprised you don’t.PurpleJ said:
Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
Could you be any more self righteous? -
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off. -
The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?sarktastic said:
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off. -
No, the oil that powers your computer in the school library.
-
I'm not self righteous. The Lord is my salvation. God bless!CirrhosisDawg said:
I support local choice and self determination. Not surprised you don’t.PurpleJ said:
Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
Could you be any more self righteous? -
OK, name the subsidies.Gwad said:
The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?sarktastic said:
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
Please be specific.
I'll wait. -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/energy-and-environment/2017/10/6/16428458/us-energy-coal-oil-subsidiesBlu82 said:
OK, name the subsidies.Gwad said:
The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?sarktastic said:
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
Please be specific.
I'll wait.
