Ballot Harvesting
Comments
-
So the bank has a check tax to cash a check? There is a driving tax to drive a car? An Airline tax to fly? This sorry excuse is so you communist asshats can continue with voter fraud. Plain and simple. I had to give my ID to get my cell phone account so there is a cell phone tax?2001400ex said:
The government has determined that to be a poll tax in some instances.Sledog said:
Is an ID a poll tax?2001400ex said:
Read up on poll tax. You are providing an opinion on something you know nothing about. As. Always.SFGbob said:Hondo perfer ass raping 10 year Mexican boys and loading Jews into boxcars.
What did I say that's in violation of the Constitution my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend?
Or elections are null and void without ensuring that only citizens vote and that they are registered, allowed and the actual person they say they are.
FTFY -
-
The only instance where the Government has determined a voter ID laws to be a poll tax is when the state requires that the voter have an ID that must be paid for by the voter.
Other than that voter ID laws are perfectly Constitutional. You'll notice that despite the fact that Hondo is a ConLaw scholar he never cited the "instance" where they don't pass Constitutional muster and I never even cited voter ID laws.
The District Court case that Hondo cited was overruled precisely because the Appellate Court had determined that the Texas Legislature had written their voter ID law in such a way that it wasn't a financial burden on the voter.
-
Better to have them harvesting ballots than baby parts
-
Yes, but they harvest ballots so that they can continue to harvest baby parts.
-
So you are saying that I was right. That certain instances, voter ID is a poll tax.SFGbob said:The only instance where the Government has determined a voter ID laws to be a poll tax is when the state requires that the voter have an ID that must be paid for by the voter.
Other than that voter ID laws are perfectly Constitutional. You'll notice that despite the fact that Hondo is a ConLaw scholar he never cited the "instance" where they don't pass Constitutional muster and I never even cited voter ID laws.
The District Court case that Hondo cited was overruled precisely because the Appellate Court had determined that the Texas Legislature had written their voter ID law in such a way that it wasn't a financial burden on the voter.
And yes, while the government hasn't ruled it to be true, there is an argument that making people wait in line at a polling place is a form of poll tax.
Pull your head out of your ass and look at the real world. -
I say we go back to land owners vote! I will allow adding those that actually pay taxes. If you live on the government dole you should not be able to vote to enrich yourself.
-
No, you're wrong and you're a liar. Nothing I cited comes even remotely close be a "poll tax." There are "arguments" that say all kinds of things dipshit but that doesn't make it a fact. I can make an argument that you're not a lying Kunt, doesn't make it so.
You claimed that what I was advocating was in violation of the Constitution and amounted to a poll tax and that the Government had already defined what I was advocating as a poll tax.
Not that there were "arguments" that made that claim but that the government itself had made that claim.
Nothing I said equaled being a "poll tax."
-
I'd go along with the idea that you have to be a net tax payer and that you can't be employed by the government outside of the military.Sledog said:I say we go back to land owners vote! I will allow adding those that actually pay taxes. If you live on the government dole you should not be able to vote to enrich yourself.
People who pay no income taxes have no business voting on issues and for people who want to raise taxes and spending paid for by others.
-
Sledog and bobsled want only the ownership class to have a vote. Both of your true colors are showing.
