Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
#FirePete
Bread
Member Posts: 4,109
They "looked past" cal? Pete's main thing has been every game is tuff. If his own players don't believe that what has been the point of the last 4 years? Bring back Sark.
Comments
-
Great senior leadership
-
Bread said:
They "looked past" cal? Pete's main thing has been every game is tuff hard. If his own players don't believe that what has been the point of the last 4 years? Bring back Sark.
-
You can say the same message over and over yet when you get lazy you get punched in the mouth
-
Cal was looking past UCLA to Oregon State
-
Pete is effective at communicating to the media the importance of preparing for each opponent the same way.Bread said:
They "looked past" cal? Pete's main thing has been every game is tuff. If his own players don't believe that what has been the point of the last 4 years? Bring back Sark.
Apparently he is just not effective at communicating that to his team. -
That's just how players explain getting beat by inferior opponents. Standard losing player speak. He probably said they also need to execute better somewhere in the interview as well. They said the same shit after ASU last year. Fact of the matter is the talent gap is not as great as it was in 2016. The O is not as good without a burner and without Tedford, thus terrible road loses at ASU and now Cal. O needs to simplify and get more dependent on a physical run game. Pete wants to take games into 4th quarter and rely on a bend but don't break D with a finesse O? Doesn't add up.
-
Tree going to rape us
-
You guys have never heard a player interviewed after losing to an inferior team?
This is what they say. Everytime. -
Hide the plungers. Make them bring their own.WeakarmCobra said:Tree going to rape us
-
What I'd rather hear: we lost to cal. We always lose to calHillsboroDuck said:You guys have never heard a player interviewed after losing to an inferior team?
This is what they say. Everytime.
