Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition
Comments
-
Like Anita Hill she failed to deliver. It was over when she wouldn't fly, she just wouldn't, Except for all the times she does. Then Grassley waved the sworn affadavits under penalty of a felony of her 4 "witnesses" denying it and the game was over
The dude, like Thomas, was just some angry theater for the masses.
The fact the dems still want to delay the vote lets you know what they think
If they had killed him we would be voting now -
Grassley is screaming for the kids to get off his lawn!!!!!!RaceBannon said:Like Anita Hill she failed to deliver. It was over when she wouldn't fly, she just wouldn't, Except for all the times she does. Then Grassley waved the sworn affadavits under penalty of a felony of her 4 "witnesses" denying it and the game was over
The dude, like Thomas, was just some angry theater for the masses.
The fact the dems still want to delay the vote lets you know what they think
If they had killed him we would be voting now
This is over. He's on. -
Another funny is Liz Swisher, MD at UW saying "I know he was a sloppy drunk because I drank with him." Um, Dr. Swisher, I have to ask: If you were drunk, how is your memory reliable? Kind of a dumb thing for a doctor to say? No?
-
Women went for TrumpAZDuck said:
This is about who gets the base out. The democrats got both out today
The GOP congress was going to go quietly to defeat. Now the GOP base is as angry as Kavs -
Blumenthal didn't do well. He came off weak and he let Kavs (I like to call him Kavs) control the conversation. Kavs won that one.
-
Like they did in 2016?AZDuck said: -
Blumenthal should have told Kavanaugh that due his time spent deep in the shit in "Nam" where he assaulted plenty of zipper-heads and gooks, he knows Kav is lying.creepycoug said:Blumenthal didn't do well. He came off weak and he let Kavs (I like to call him Kavs) control the conversation. Kavs won that one.
-
Been through it for work. Two questions would have been nice.AZDuck said:
That first story is entirely accurate and does not support your assertion. The second story you link is much more slanted but still does not support your assertion.Sledog said:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/experts-doubt-claim-of-truthful-polygraph-result-from-kavanaugh-accuserAZDuck said:
who?Sledog said:
He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.AZDuck said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASledog said:
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Be a better poasterAZDuck said:
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."
Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/09/report-ford-polygraph-expert-says-victims-like-ford-you-believe-them-dont-ask-specific-questions/
As I've said, all a poly does is tell you whether a subject is being "deceptive" or "evasive," which is pretty much what the first story says. Also, polygraphs aren't admissible in court, for the very good reason that they have to be interpreted and that interpretation is subjective.
Smart defense attorneys have ex-FBI, CID, or NCIS polygraphers on speed dial, because the investigative poly will almost invariably come along with the polygrapher, who also tends to be the best interrogator in the office (funny how that works).
Of course, while the poly isn't admissible, anything the accused says *is.* Which is the real reason for the season in terms of polygraphs.
