Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
She-Guevara racist white nationalist
Comments
-
I don't know it all, but I do know some things. Zimmerman had no control over when the police would arrive at the scene. Zimmerman had no control over who may of witnessed the encounter with Trademark. I don't know that his story is 100% true and I've never made that claim. There is an epidemic of strawman ass fucking on this board. Zimmerman had all of about 30 seconds to concoct a story that would fit the physical evidence and that wouldn't be refuted by any eyewitnesses. He also had no idea of the timeline that would be created by both his and Trademark's cell phone conversation. To the extent that he controlled the narrative he did so because the facts, many of which he had no control over, matched up closely with the evidence and the story he told.TurdBuffer said:
And it's pretty fucking dumb to act like a know-it-all when one participant in an altercation is dead and can't speak for himself. You think you know all the facts, when the other side of the story is 6 feet under. Zimmerman's side controlled the narrative from beginning to end and to YOU, there's no question that it's 100% true. Could you seriously be more ignorant? Martin forfeited his right to contest Zimmerman by dying. To you, I suppose that's lazy. Zimmerman got off because the state couldn't prove it's case. Fine. That's how the ball bounces. But to go on and on like poor little George was 100% innocent makes you a Jack-Ass, @SFGbob, bordering on moronic.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
-
Hardly surprising you seem to think your feelings are facts. Meanwhile I know you're full of shit. Zimmerman was brandishing a gun!!!!!creepycoug said:
I get the feeling you don't really know at all WTF you're talking about.SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
Carry on. Be sure to write from vocabulary camp. And don't forget your tampons! -
You've run with that for 5 miles and continue to ignore the only germane point, because you can't deal with it.SFGbob said:
Try reading Kunt. You'd think that if you were willing to tongue his ass, you'd also go to the trouble of reading what he said. I didn't claim Zimmerman had his gun pulled Coug did and obviously you agree with him.2001400ex said:
That's what you said. You just said it.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
Holy fuck all man.
Just really doesn't matter whether his gun was drawn or not. Does. Not. Matter. So, I'll stipulate that it wasn't, even though neither you nor I know when it was first brandished. That's settled.
Following and chasing minors who don't know you, at night, is perfectly normal and legal behavior, and if the kid winds up hitting you it's assault and battery and you are w/in your legal and moral rights to shoot him dead.
If you're in a dark parking lot with your wife or husband, and some guy who'd been following you in his car suddenly jumps out of his car and sprints towards your wife/husband, you're going to stand there with your hands in your pockets. Well, bad example, because you probably would since you're a punk.
If
(1) Trayvon's name had been Bartholemew, and
(2) Bart had been on his way back from a night-time 7-11 Cophenhagen run, and
(3) Some black busy body neighborhood watch loser with a rap sheet a mile long had followed him in his car, and
(4) Later left his car to chase him, and
(5) Wound up getting his ass kicked by Bart, and
(6) Shot Bart in 'self defense',
you'd be on here bleeding heavier than you are now over the whole lack of education thing. At least you answered one question: you are another Zimmerman, which was hardly a mystery.
Hey, do you remember back in the thread where you said Z wasn't profiling and then said Z was profiling?
Good luck at vocabulary camp. Remember your tampons. -
Feeeeeelings, nothing more than feeeeeeeeelings,creepycoug said:
You've run with that for 5 miles and continue to ignore the only germane point, because you can't deal with it.SFGbob said:
Try reading Kunt. You'd think that if you were willing to tongue his ass, you'd also go to the trouble of reading what he said. I didn't claim Zimmerman had his gun pulled Coug did and obviously you agree with him.2001400ex said:
That's what you said. You just said it.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
Holy fuck all man.
Just really doesn't matter whether his gun was drawn or not. Does. Not. Matter. So, I'll stipulate that it wasn't, even though neither you nor I know when it was first brandished. That's settled.
Following and chasing minors who don't know you, at night, is perfectly normal and legal behavior, and if the kid winds up hitting you it's assault and battery and you are w/in your legal and moral rights to shoot him dead.
If you're in a dark parking lot with your wife or husband, and some guy who'd been following you in his car suddenly jumps out of his car and sprints towards your wife/husband, you're going to stand there with your hands in your pockets. Well, bad example, because you probably would since you're a punk.
If
(1) Trayvon's name had been Bartholemew, and
(2) Bart had been on his way back from a night-time 7-11 Cophenhagen run, and
(3) Some black busy body neighborhood watch loser with a rap sheet a mile long had followed him in his car, and
(4) Later left his car to chase him, and
(5) Wound up getting his ass kicked by Bart, and
(6) Shot Bart in 'self defense',
you'd be on here bleeding heavier than you are now over the whole lack of education thing. At least you answered one question: you are another Zimmerman, which was hardly a mystery.
Hey, do you remember back in the thread where you said Z wasn't profiling and then said Z was profiling?
Good luck at vocabulary camp. Remember your tampons. -
Does your family know they're on their own because their Dad's a punk?SFGbob said:
Feeeeeelings, nothing more than feeeeeeeeelings,creepycoug said:
You've run with that for 5 miles and continue to ignore the only germane point, because you can't deal with it.SFGbob said:
Try reading Kunt. You'd think that if you were willing to tongue his ass, you'd also go to the trouble of reading what he said. I didn't claim Zimmerman had his gun pulled Coug did and obviously you agree with him.2001400ex said:
That's what you said. You just said it.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
Holy fuck all man.
Just really doesn't matter whether his gun was drawn or not. Does. Not. Matter. So, I'll stipulate that it wasn't, even though neither you nor I know when it was first brandished. That's settled.
Following and chasing minors who don't know you, at night, is perfectly normal and legal behavior, and if the kid winds up hitting you it's assault and battery and you are w/in your legal and moral rights to shoot him dead.
If you're in a dark parking lot with your wife or husband, and some guy who'd been following you in his car suddenly jumps out of his car and sprints towards your wife/husband, you're going to stand there with your hands in your pockets. Well, bad example, because you probably would since you're a punk.
If
(1) Trayvon's name had been Bartholemew, and
(2) Bart had been on his way back from a night-time 7-11 Cophenhagen run, and
(3) Some black busy body neighborhood watch loser with a rap sheet a mile long had followed him in his car, and
(4) Later left his car to chase him, and
(5) Wound up getting his ass kicked by Bart, and
(6) Shot Bart in 'self defense',
you'd be on here bleeding heavier than you are now over the whole lack of education thing. At least you answered one question: you are another Zimmerman, which was hardly a mystery.
Hey, do you remember back in the thread where you said Z wasn't profiling and then said Z was profiling?
Good luck at vocabulary camp. Remember your tampons.
#trayvontuff -
Whoooooooa, whoooooa, feeeeeeeelings, feeeeelings of luuuuuuuuuv........
-
If your bashing straw man ass fucking, I'm out.SFGbob said:
I don't know it all, but I do know some things. Zimmerman had no control over when the police would arrive at the scene. Zimmerman had no control over who may of witnessed the encounter with Trademark. I don't know that his story is 100% true and I've never made that claim. There is an epidemic of strawman ass fucking on this board. Zimmerman had all of about 30 seconds to concoct a story that would fit the physical evidence and that wouldn't be refuted by any eyewitnesses. He also had no idea of the timeline that would be created by both his and Trademark's cell phone conversation. To the extent that he controlled the narrative he did so because the facts, many of which he had no control over, matched up closely with the evidence and the story he told.TurdBuffer said:
And it's pretty fucking dumb to act like a know-it-all when one participant in an altercation is dead and can't speak for himself. You think you know all the facts, when the other side of the story is 6 feet under. Zimmerman's side controlled the narrative from beginning to end and to YOU, there's no question that it's 100% true. Could you seriously be more ignorant? Martin forfeited his right to contest Zimmerman by dying. To you, I suppose that's lazy. Zimmerman got off because the state couldn't prove it's case. Fine. That's how the ball bounces. But to go on and on like poor little George was 100% innocent makes you a Jack-Ass, @SFGbob, bordering on moronic.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
-
Even strawmen need love but some of the people here are moving into strawman bunghole abuse.TurdBuffer said:
If your bashing straw man ass fucking, I'm out.SFGbob said:
I don't know it all, but I do know some things. Zimmerman had no control over when the police would arrive at the scene. Zimmerman had no control over who may of witnessed the encounter with Trademark. I don't know that his story is 100% true and I've never made that claim. There is an epidemic of strawman ass fucking on this board. Zimmerman had all of about 30 seconds to concoct a story that would fit the physical evidence and that wouldn't be refuted by any eyewitnesses. He also had no idea of the timeline that would be created by both his and Trademark's cell phone conversation. To the extent that he controlled the narrative he did so because the facts, many of which he had no control over, matched up closely with the evidence and the story he told.TurdBuffer said:
And it's pretty fucking dumb to act like a know-it-all when one participant in an altercation is dead and can't speak for himself. You think you know all the facts, when the other side of the story is 6 feet under. Zimmerman's side controlled the narrative from beginning to end and to YOU, there's no question that it's 100% true. Could you seriously be more ignorant? Martin forfeited his right to contest Zimmerman by dying. To you, I suppose that's lazy. Zimmerman got off because the state couldn't prove it's case. Fine. That's how the ball bounces. But to go on and on like poor little George was 100% innocent makes you a Jack-Ass, @SFGbob, bordering on moronic.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
-
Jimminy Christmas you're a homo.SFGbob said:
Even strawmen need love but some of the people here are moving into strawman bunghole abuse.TurdBuffer said:
If your bashing straw man ass fucking, I'm out.SFGbob said:
I don't know it all, but I do know some things. Zimmerman had no control over when the police would arrive at the scene. Zimmerman had no control over who may of witnessed the encounter with Trademark. I don't know that his story is 100% true and I've never made that claim. There is an epidemic of strawman ass fucking on this board. Zimmerman had all of about 30 seconds to concoct a story that would fit the physical evidence and that wouldn't be refuted by any eyewitnesses. He also had no idea of the timeline that would be created by both his and Trademark's cell phone conversation. To the extent that he controlled the narrative he did so because the facts, many of which he had no control over, matched up closely with the evidence and the story he told.TurdBuffer said:
And it's pretty fucking dumb to act like a know-it-all when one participant in an altercation is dead and can't speak for himself. You think you know all the facts, when the other side of the story is 6 feet under. Zimmerman's side controlled the narrative from beginning to end and to YOU, there's no question that it's 100% true. Could you seriously be more ignorant? Martin forfeited his right to contest Zimmerman by dying. To you, I suppose that's lazy. Zimmerman got off because the state couldn't prove it's case. Fine. That's how the ball bounces. But to go on and on like poor little George was 100% innocent makes you a Jack-Ass, @SFGbob, bordering on moronic.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
-
We appears to have a bleeder here. Must be on account of your superior intellect and education. Now get back in there and emote, I'm sure Hondo will be along shortly to tongue your ass.creepycoug said:
Jimminy Christmas you're a homo.SFGbob said:
Even strawmen need love but some of the people here are moving into strawman bunghole abuse.TurdBuffer said:
If your bashing straw man ass fucking, I'm out.SFGbob said:
I don't know it all, but I do know some things. Zimmerman had no control over when the police would arrive at the scene. Zimmerman had no control over who may of witnessed the encounter with Trademark. I don't know that his story is 100% true and I've never made that claim. There is an epidemic of strawman ass fucking on this board. Zimmerman had all of about 30 seconds to concoct a story that would fit the physical evidence and that wouldn't be refuted by any eyewitnesses. He also had no idea of the timeline that would be created by both his and Trademark's cell phone conversation. To the extent that he controlled the narrative he did so because the facts, many of which he had no control over, matched up closely with the evidence and the story he told.TurdBuffer said:
And it's pretty fucking dumb to act like a know-it-all when one participant in an altercation is dead and can't speak for himself. You think you know all the facts, when the other side of the story is 6 feet under. Zimmerman's side controlled the narrative from beginning to end and to YOU, there's no question that it's 100% true. Could you seriously be more ignorant? Martin forfeited his right to contest Zimmerman by dying. To you, I suppose that's lazy. Zimmerman got off because the state couldn't prove it's case. Fine. That's how the ball bounces. But to go on and on like poor little George was 100% innocent makes you a Jack-Ass, @SFGbob, bordering on moronic.SFGbob said:
It's pretty fucking funny how you love to flyspeck other peoples typos and misspellings Hondo. So I guess you're now on board with Coug's claim about Zimmerman already having his gun pulled when Trademark attacked him.2001400ex said:
Is it a crime to assault someone with their gun drawn while stalking you?SFGbob said:
Well there is no crime following someone in public. It is a crime to assault someone.TurdBuffer said:
I wouldn't have stalked the kid like a Creepy-Ass-White-Guy in the first place.SFGbob said:
How long would you allow someone to beat your head against the concrete before you responded?TurdBuffer said:Basically, @SFGbob, all you're saying is that if you were in Zimmerman's shoes on the night in question, you'd have done the exact same thing. Got it.
