Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Pro-Hamdan post

Gladstone
Member Posts: 16,419
The jag midget WRs all look significantly, amazingly better. That's definitely the Bush effect.
Comments
-
It's gonna be a very good unit next year when Fuller is a senior ty Jones is a junior and someone else from the last 2 classes is contributing.
Oh and when they have a QB. -
Nega-Hamden post Gaskin didn't take a direct snap every play
-
Wouldn't that be Lubick? Thought he coached receivers. Jury's out on Hamdan for me. He gets slack from most on here for his recruiting ability but call me thoroughly unimpressed with his first game.Gladstone said:The jag midget WRs all look significantly, amazingly better. That's definitely the Bush effect.
1) QB draw inside the 10
2) Speed option with Browning
3) Numerous inside runs against the best part of their defense
4) Zero creativity in the run game, i.e. no misdirection
5) Little to no use of Chico
6) Wasted downs at the end, run on 2nd and 13, wtf?
I'm sure he'll get better but anyone not calling him out for that performance, man I don't get it. -
No, that wouldn't be Lubick.
-
Lubick coaches the WRs.whuggy said: -
Not enough off tackle WTE power runs with browning under centerwhuggy said:
Wouldn't that be Lubick? Thought he coached receivers. Jury's out on Hamdan for me. He gets slack from most on here for his recruiting ability but call me thoroughly unimpressed with his first game.Gladstone said:The jag midget WRs all look significantly, amazingly better. That's definitely the Bush effect.
1) QB draw inside the 10
2) Speed option with Browning
3) Numerous inside runs against the best part of their defense
4) Zero creativity in the run game, i.e. no misdirection
5) Little to no use of Chico
6) Wasted downs at the end, run on 2nd and 13, wtf?
I'm sure he'll get better but anyone not calling him out for that performance, man I don't get it.
Not enough use of Gaskins/Ahmed in flat/shallow matched up against their LBs
Not enough shallow crossing routes against their LBs
Not enough TE 10 yard out under the WR go clearout
It was instantly obvious that we couldn't run the ball inside against Auburn's DL and that their LBs were good at attacking downhill against the run but were a liability laterally or in coverage