Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I know we like to give the Ducks a hard time around here, but #19 is really impressive

dncdnc Member Posts: 56,691
in Hardcore Husky Board
Props to Oregon for this





· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dawgs206dawgs206 Member Posts: 482
    Mosster47 said:

    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.

    I'll help your fren. Michigan (#3, #13) , LSU (#12, #14) , and UW (#8, #5) all finished in the top 15 in total defense and scoring defense last year. I'll give you USC, so 1/4. Michigan and LSU were top 10 in passing efficiency defense, while UW was #29.

    Interested to see what you say about Oregon achieving their preseason ranking after this year if those teams are underachieving.

    You are either a world class whoosher or like throwing shit at a wall to see if anything will stick (hint - 90% of the time it doesn't).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    dawgs206 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.

    I'll help your fren. Michigan (#3, #13) , LSU (#12, #14) , and UW (#8, #5) all finished in the top 15 in total defense and scoring defense last year. I'll give you USC, so 1/4. Michigan and LSU were top 10 in passing efficiency defense, while UW was #29.

    Interested to see what you say about Oregon achieving their preseason ranking after this year if those teams are underachieving.

    You are either a world class whoosher or like throwing shit at a wall to see if anything will stick (hint - 90% of the time it doesn't).
    My comment meant your secondary being amazing doesn't equal team success at all, like not ever a little. Michigan sucked, LSU sucked, UW was UW, and SC couldn't make the playoffs with an all-world QB.

    Oregon has a sophomore, a sophomore, a sophomore, and a senior that played a different position three years prior starting in their secondary this year. I agree they are very talented but don't have a ton of experience so 19 would be a fair ranking for the position group. They won't make the team good or bad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,212 Founders Club
    Flagged for preseason rankings bullshit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rustysavagerustysavage Member Posts: 942
    Mosster47 said:

    dawgs206 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.

    I'll help your fren. Michigan (#3, #13) , LSU (#12, #14) , and UW (#8, #5) all finished in the top 15 in total defense and scoring defense last year. I'll give you USC, so 1/4. Michigan and LSU were top 10 in passing efficiency defense, while UW was #29.

    Interested to see what you say about Oregon achieving their preseason ranking after this year if those teams are underachieving.

    You are either a world class whoosher or like throwing shit at a wall to see if anything will stick (hint - 90% of the time it doesn't).
    My comment meant your secondary being amazing doesn't equal team success at all, like not ever a little. Michigan sucked, LSU sucked, UW was UW, and SC couldn't make the playoffs with an all-world QB.

    Oregon has a sophomore, a sophomore, a sophomore, and a senior that played a different position three years prior starting in their secondary this year. I agree they are very talented but don't have a ton of experience so 19 would be a fair ranking for the position group. They won't make the team good or bad.
    Uhh.... What? They sure made the team bad two years ago.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Utah? ROFL
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    rustysavage said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dawgs206 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.

    I'll help your fren. Michigan (#3, #13) , LSU (#12, #14) , and UW (#8, #5) all finished in the top 15 in total defense and scoring defense last year. I'll give you USC, so 1/4. Michigan and LSU were top 10 in passing efficiency defense, while UW was #29.

    Interested to see what you say about Oregon achieving their preseason ranking after this year if those teams are underachieving.

    You are either a world class whoosher or like throwing shit at a wall to see if anything will stick (hint - 90% of the time it doesn't).
    My comment meant your secondary being amazing doesn't equal team success at all, like not ever a little. Michigan sucked, LSU sucked, UW was UW, and SC couldn't make the playoffs with an all-world QB.

    Oregon has a sophomore, a sophomore, a sophomore, and a senior that played a different position three years prior starting in their secondary this year. I agree they are very talented but don't have a ton of experience so 19 would be a fair ranking for the position group. They won't make the team good or bad.
    Uhh.... What? They sure made the team bad two years ago.
    Nope, not at all. Brady Hoke defending seven gaps with five guys made the team bad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,849
    Every year, without fail, the so called analysts and experts overrate Utah. I’ll never get it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Mosster47 said:

    rustysavage said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dawgs206 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.

    I'll help your fren. Michigan (#3, #13) , LSU (#12, #14) , and UW (#8, #5) all finished in the top 15 in total defense and scoring defense last year. I'll give you USC, so 1/4. Michigan and LSU were top 10 in passing efficiency defense, while UW was #29.

    Interested to see what you say about Oregon achieving their preseason ranking after this year if those teams are underachieving.

    You are either a world class whoosher or like throwing shit at a wall to see if anything will stick (hint - 90% of the time it doesn't).
    My comment meant your secondary being amazing doesn't equal team success at all, like not ever a little. Michigan sucked, LSU sucked, UW was UW, and SC couldn't make the playoffs with an all-world QB.

    Oregon has a sophomore, a sophomore, a sophomore, and a senior that played a different position three years prior starting in their secondary this year. I agree they are very talented but don't have a ton of experience so 19 would be a fair ranking for the position group. They won't make the team good or bad.
    Uhh.... What? They sure made the team bad two years ago.
    Nope, not at all. Brady Hoke defending seven gaps with five guys made the team bad.
    They’ll get it fixed this year!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Mosster47 said:

    rustysavage said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dawgs206 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sweet! Why do all four of the top teams underachieve like clockwork?

    Asking for a fren.

    I'll help your fren. Michigan (#3, #13) , LSU (#12, #14) , and UW (#8, #5) all finished in the top 15 in total defense and scoring defense last year. I'll give you USC, so 1/4. Michigan and LSU were top 10 in passing efficiency defense, while UW was #29.

    Interested to see what you say about Oregon achieving their preseason ranking after this year if those teams are underachieving.

    You are either a world class whoosher or like throwing shit at a wall to see if anything will stick (hint - 90% of the time it doesn't).
    My comment meant your secondary being amazing doesn't equal team success at all, like not ever a little. Michigan sucked, LSU sucked, UW was UW, and SC couldn't make the playoffs with an all-world QB.

    Oregon has a sophomore, a sophomore, a sophomore, and a senior that played a different position three years prior starting in their secondary this year. I agree they are very talented but don't have a ton of experience so 19 would be a fair ranking for the position group. They won't make the team good or bad.
    Uhh.... What? They sure made the team bad two years ago.
    Nope, not at all. Brady Hoke defending seven gaps with five guys made the team bad.
    Run the two-hole.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Doogles said:

    salemcoog said:

    Every year, without fail, the so called analysts and experts overrate Utah. I’ll never get it.

    It's because Utah is the best coached team minus UW and Stanford.

    We're lucky he shits the bed against us every year, but Utah is the safest bet to go 8-5/9-4 every year.
    No they aren't. They got ass raped by Braxton Burmeister last year. The original Doog legend couldn't even stoop that low on his farewell tour.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,691
    Mosster47 said:

    Doogles said:

    salemcoog said:

    Every year, without fail, the so called analysts and experts overrate Utah. I’ll never get it.

    It's because Utah is the best coached team minus UW and Stanford.

    We're lucky he shits the bed against us every year, but Utah is the safest bet to go 8-5/9-4 every year.
    No they aren't. They got ass raped by Braxton Burmeister last year. The original Doog legend couldn't even stoop that low on his farewell tour.
    One game data samples always lead to great conclusions
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • QuietcowskeeQuietcowskee Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,324 Swaye's Wigwam
    Herbert seems like your Locker, the intoxicating Quixotic windmill that will never save you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,981 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    Doogles said:

    salemcoog said:

    Every year, without fail, the so called analysts and experts overrate Utah. I’ll never get it.

    It's because Utah is the best coached team minus UW and Stanford.

    We're lucky he shits the bed against us every year, but Utah is the safest bet to go 8-5/9-4 every year.
    No they aren't. They got ass raped by Braxton Burmeister last year. The original Doog legend couldn't even stoop that low on his farewell tour.
    How much does he bench though?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 4,679 Standard Supporter
    Quietcowskee said:

    Herbert seems like your Locker, the intoxicating Quixotic windmill that will never save you.

    Shut the fuck up you stupid motherfucker.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    ThomasFremont said:

    Utah? ROFL

    NYBE
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Mosster47 said:

    Doogles said:

    salemcoog said:

    Every year, without fail, the so called analysts and experts overrate Utah. I’ll never get it.

    It's because Utah is the best coached team minus UW and Stanford.

    We're lucky he shits the bed against us every year, but Utah is the safest bet to go 8-5/9-4 every year.
    No they aren't. They got ass raped by Braxton Burmeister last year. The original Doog legend couldn't even stoop that low on his farewell tour.
    Not even one of your worst efforts, but still. lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.