Trump's tax cut didn't trickle down
Comments
-
I have my own source2001400ex said:
Looks like you have the same news source as doogbot.RaceBannon said:2001400ex said:
Then why don't you bag on Trump for increasing spending?MikeDamone said:
Yeah, so what? I’m not a partisan dipshit like you. My point remains. Spend less.2001400ex said:
Republicans have been doing a great job fulfilling their campaign promise to cut spending. Oh wait.MikeDamone said:
1. Tarrifs aren’t good. Whoever says that is wrong.2001400ex said:Yet you Trump dick suckers don't come with any valid points. Just suck is dick. Tariffs are good!!!! North Korea is our friend and will denuclearize!!!! Tax cuts will bring in more revenue than they cost!!!!
2. Describing a tax cut as a cost is also wrong. If you don’t get robbed, do you describe the money that the robber didn’t take as a cost to the robber? Also,Federal tax revenue is at an all time high. Was that caused by the tax cuts? Or even though it’s at an all time high, would it have been higher without the cuts? I don’t know or care. I do know they have more than enough money to meet all of their constitutional and current statutory obligations. Spend less.

-
Why do you hate where Trump has increased spending?RaceBannon said:
I have my own source2001400ex said:
Looks like you have the same news source as doogbot.RaceBannon said:2001400ex said:
Then why don't you bag on Trump for increasing spending?MikeDamone said:
Yeah, so what? I’m not a partisan dipshit like you. My point remains. Spend less.2001400ex said:
Republicans have been doing a great job fulfilling their campaign promise to cut spending. Oh wait.MikeDamone said:
1. Tarrifs aren’t good. Whoever says that is wrong.2001400ex said:Yet you Trump dick suckers don't come with any valid points. Just suck is dick. Tariffs are good!!!! North Korea is our friend and will denuclearize!!!! Tax cuts will bring in more revenue than they cost!!!!
2. Describing a tax cut as a cost is also wrong. If you don’t get robbed, do you describe the money that the robber didn’t take as a cost to the robber? Also,Federal tax revenue is at an all time high. Was that caused by the tax cuts? Or even though it’s at an all time high, would it have been higher without the cuts? I don’t know or care. I do know they have more than enough money to meet all of their constitutional and current statutory obligations. Spend less.

-
Really? Again you don’t pay attention. In this thread I said tarrifs are flat out wrong. I can’t really think of much praise I’ve given Trump either. But here, let me help you since you have a hard time figuring stuff out. I like the tax cuts and a lot of the degrulation. I hate tarrifs, spending, suggesting violating the 4th and 5th amendments. That’s a start. Do you need a comprehensive list?2001400ex said:
I am a worthless idiot. That being said, that's the first thing I've seen you type against Trump. And you say I make assumptions. But you think I'm a socialist.MikeDamone said:
Sorry. I didn’t realize I had to prove shit to you.2001400ex said:
Then why don't you bag on Trump for increasing spending?MikeDamone said:
Yeah, so what? I’m not a partisan dipshit like you. My point remains. Spend less.2001400ex said:
Republicans have been doing a great job fulfilling their campaign promise to cut spending. Oh wait.MikeDamone said:
1. Tarrifs aren’t good. Whoever says that is wrong.2001400ex said:Yet you Trump dick suckers don't come with any valid points. Just suck is dick. Tariffs are good!!!! North Korea is our friend and will denuclearize!!!! Tax cuts will bring in more revenue than they cost!!!!
2. Describing a tax cut as a cost is also wrong. If you don’t get robbed, do you describe the money that the robber didn’t take as a cost to the robber? Also,Federal tax revenue is at an all time high. Was that caused by the tax cuts? Or even though it’s at an all time high, would it have been higher without the cuts? I don’t know or care. I do know they have more than enough money to meet all of their constitutional and current statutory obligations. Spend less.
The republican budget signed by Trump was too big, contained too much waste and continued to grow the government. I was against it. Happy?
Fuck you don’t pay attention or think. You just make a bunch of assumptions and start with your talking points. That’s why everyone but APAG thinks you’re a worthless idiot.
When did I say you are a socialist? You don’t even know what one is, so how would you know if you are one? -
I need to see some facts
-
Receipts are going down. Expenditures up.... HTH but I know it won't.RaceBannon said:I need to see some facts
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=53&eid=5272 -
There you go. Nice work. You aren't a shill like Race.MikeDamone said:
Really? Again you don’t pay attention. In this thread I said tarrifs are flat out wrong. I can’t really think of much praise I’ve given Trump either. But here, let me help you since you have a hard time figuring stuff out. I like the tax cuts and a lot of the degrulation. I hate tarrifs, spending, suggesting violating the 4th and 5th amendments. That’s a start. Do you need a comprehensive list?2001400ex said:
I am a worthless idiot. That being said, that's the first thing I've seen you type against Trump. And you say I make assumptions. But you think I'm a socialist.MikeDamone said:
Sorry. I didn’t realize I had to prove shit to you.2001400ex said:
Then why don't you bag on Trump for increasing spending?MikeDamone said:
Yeah, so what? I’m not a partisan dipshit like you. My point remains. Spend less.2001400ex said:
Republicans have been doing a great job fulfilling their campaign promise to cut spending. Oh wait.MikeDamone said:
1. Tarrifs aren’t good. Whoever says that is wrong.2001400ex said:Yet you Trump dick suckers don't come with any valid points. Just suck is dick. Tariffs are good!!!! North Korea is our friend and will denuclearize!!!! Tax cuts will bring in more revenue than they cost!!!!
2. Describing a tax cut as a cost is also wrong. If you don’t get robbed, do you describe the money that the robber didn’t take as a cost to the robber? Also,Federal tax revenue is at an all time high. Was that caused by the tax cuts? Or even though it’s at an all time high, would it have been higher without the cuts? I don’t know or care. I do know they have more than enough money to meet all of their constitutional and current statutory obligations. Spend less.
The republican budget signed by Trump was too big, contained too much waste and continued to grow the government. I was against it. Happy?
Fuck you don’t pay attention or think. You just make a bunch of assumptions and start with your talking points. That’s why everyone but APAG thinks you’re a worthless idiot.
When did I say you are a socialist? You don’t even know what one is, so how would you know if you are one?
Thing is, no current Democrat is actually a socialist. No one is arguing for the government to own businesses in this country. Tho people like OBK use socialist to cover people like Bernie. Who isn't a socialist but does want to socialize a couple areas. One I agree with being medical. But that'll never happen. -
-
These are good figures, but I think the better measure is % of GDP rather than absolute dollars. I think the CBO put out such numbers recently, but I can't find them with a quick search.2001400ex said:
Receipts are going down. Expenditures up.... HTH but I know it won't.RaceBannon said:I need to see some facts
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=53&eid=5272 -
Oh, 18% of GDP, is that all?2001400ex said:
There you go. Nice work. You aren't a shill like Race.MikeDamone said:
Really? Again you don’t pay attention. In this thread I said tarrifs are flat out wrong. I can’t really think of much praise I’ve given Trump either. But here, let me help you since you have a hard time figuring stuff out. I like the tax cuts and a lot of the degrulation. I hate tarrifs, spending, suggesting violating the 4th and 5th amendments. That’s a start. Do you need a comprehensive list?2001400ex said:
I am a worthless idiot. That being said, that's the first thing I've seen you type against Trump. And you say I make assumptions. But you think I'm a socialist.MikeDamone said:
Sorry. I didn’t realize I had to prove shit to you.2001400ex said:
Then why don't you bag on Trump for increasing spending?MikeDamone said:
Yeah, so what? I’m not a partisan dipshit like you. My point remains. Spend less.2001400ex said:
Republicans have been doing a great job fulfilling their campaign promise to cut spending. Oh wait.MikeDamone said:
1. Tarrifs aren’t good. Whoever says that is wrong.2001400ex said:Yet you Trump dick suckers don't come with any valid points. Just suck is dick. Tariffs are good!!!! North Korea is our friend and will denuclearize!!!! Tax cuts will bring in more revenue than they cost!!!!
2. Describing a tax cut as a cost is also wrong. If you don’t get robbed, do you describe the money that the robber didn’t take as a cost to the robber? Also,Federal tax revenue is at an all time high. Was that caused by the tax cuts? Or even though it’s at an all time high, would it have been higher without the cuts? I don’t know or care. I do know they have more than enough money to meet all of their constitutional and current statutory obligations. Spend less.
The republican budget signed by Trump was too big, contained too much waste and continued to grow the government. I was against it. Happy?
Fuck you don’t pay attention or think. You just make a bunch of assumptions and start with your talking points. That’s why everyone but APAG thinks you’re a worthless idiot.
When did I say you are a socialist? You don’t even know what one is, so how would you know if you are one?
Thing is, no current Democrat is actually a socialist. No one is arguing for the government to own businesses in this country. Tho people like OBK use socialist to cover people like Bernie. Who isn't a socialist but does want to socialize a couple areas. One I agree with being medical. But that'll never happen.
-
I just posted them



