Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The end of the world is here
Comments
-
Plenty of free porn before 2014.oregonblitzkrieg said:Well this stratergy isn't swaying any votes to the correct side of the issue. Tim to appeal to the degenerate nature of the denizens that inhabit this cuntless whorehouse. The end of NN will directly impact your porno experience, and not in a good way. HTFH.
Besides, it's been well documented that 81% of voters are retards and I could not care less what they think.
-
Porn drives everything on the Internet and before that VCRs and tapes
-
Look at what happened to Google fiber. They've quit going forward with the wires and poles expansion model because it was too expensive. The government wasn't the problem. In Nashville their city council actually passed legislation to make it cheaper and easier for Google fiber to connect to existing utility poles but ATT and Comcast fought it tooth and nail. This was pretty much the story in every market that Google fiber tried to enter. The encumbent ISP tried to make it expensive and prohibitive as possible for Google to connect to existing infrastructure.RaceBannon said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
It would be great if competition were always the answer, but it isn't in cases where the barriers to entry are so prohibitive that new competition doesn't materialize. Giving ISPs new means to fuck you over is not the answer. Governments suck. I hate the government most of the time. How about we spur some innovation and competition, and get more than one government competing for our bidness. Lets attract this new competition by giving the government some cool new tools that they can use at your expense. Say, the ability to shut down 50 newspapers a year that they don't like, or seizing all guns in a state of their choice every year. That's essentially what's going on here.RaceBannon said:
NN had a life of about 12 months at best. It is irrelevant other than as an issue to argue over at HHoregonblitzkrieg said:
The real question is, why do you want to pay more, when you don't have to? Leave well enough alone. The net was perfectly fine under NN. NN makes it so that all traffic is considered equal, ISPs cannot slow or speed up traffic to individual sites deliberately. Repealing NN is a huge step backward, not forward. It won't add any real competition to the mix, even though they're putting out a big sign that says "Hey ISPs, look at this new way you can fuck the consumr over!!!111!" It will only result in new sites being throttled before they can even get off the ground. How much innovation will be lose there? Some of the greatest thoughts, ideas and innovations originated in basements and garages. Some of those innovations will be lost if we lose the free internet. Read a little about Ajit Pai, and you'll soon realize what a stupid fucktard we have running the FCC.RaceBannon said:You pay more for access to programming every day or do you think you're basic cable package is as good as it gets?
Nothing will ever stay the same. You get low prices to get you to dump satellite or cable and watch TV on line then the price goes up
Welcome to capitalism baby
If everyone cuts the cord the cordless price is going up with or without NN or any other N
The solution is competition. Don't tell me how we can't do it tell me how we fucking can. That's how I roll bitch
The only way that is true is if the government is rigging the game -
You don't get it. At. All.RedRocket said:
Look at what happened to Google fiber. They've quit going forward with the wires and poles expansion model because it was too expensive. The government wasn't the problem. In Nashville their city council actually passed legislation to make it cheaper and easier for Google fiber to connect to existing utility poles but ATT and Comcast fought it tooth and nail. This was pretty much the story in every market that Google fiber tried to enter. The encumbent ISP tried to make it expensive and prohibitive as possible for Google to connect to existing infrastructure.RaceBannon said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
It would be great if competition were always the answer, but it isn't in cases where the barriers to entry are so prohibitive that new competition doesn't materialize. Giving ISPs new means to fuck you over is not the answer. Governments suck. I hate the government most of the time. How about we spur some innovation and competition, and get more than one government competing for our bidness. Lets attract this new competition by giving the government some cool new tools that they can use at your expense. Say, the ability to shut down 50 newspapers a year that they don't like, or seizing all guns in a state of their choice every year. That's essentially what's going on here.RaceBannon said:
NN had a life of about 12 months at best. It is irrelevant other than as an issue to argue over at HHoregonblitzkrieg said:
The real question is, why do you want to pay more, when you don't have to? Leave well enough alone. The net was perfectly fine under NN. NN makes it so that all traffic is considered equal, ISPs cannot slow or speed up traffic to individual sites deliberately. Repealing NN is a huge step backward, not forward. It won't add any real competition to the mix, even though they're putting out a big sign that says "Hey ISPs, look at this new way you can fuck the consumr over!!!111!" It will only result in new sites being throttled before they can even get off the ground. How much innovation will be lose there? Some of the greatest thoughts, ideas and innovations originated in basements and garages. Some of those innovations will be lost if we lose the free internet. Read a little about Ajit Pai, and you'll soon realize what a stupid fucktard we have running the FCC.RaceBannon said:You pay more for access to programming every day or do you think you're basic cable package is as good as it gets?
Nothing will ever stay the same. You get low prices to get you to dump satellite or cable and watch TV on line then the price goes up
Welcome to capitalism baby
If everyone cuts the cord the cordless price is going up with or without NN or any other N
The solution is competition. Don't tell me how we can't do it tell me how we fucking can. That's how I roll bitch
The only way that is true is if the government is rigging the game -
Explain why or GTFO. No platitudes.PurpleJ said:
You don't get it. At. All.RedRocket said:
Look at what happened to Google fiber. They've quit going forward with the wires and poles expansion model because it was too expensive. The government wasn't the problem. In Nashville their city council actually passed legislation to make it cheaper and easier for Google fiber to connect to existing utility poles but ATT and Comcast fought it tooth and nail. This was pretty much the story in every market that Google fiber tried to enter. The encumbent ISP tried to make it expensive and prohibitive as possible for Google to connect to existing infrastructure.RaceBannon said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
It would be great if competition were always the answer, but it isn't in cases where the barriers to entry are so prohibitive that new competition doesn't materialize. Giving ISPs new means to fuck you over is not the answer. Governments suck. I hate the government most of the time. How about we spur some innovation and competition, and get more than one government competing for our bidness. Lets attract this new competition by giving the government some cool new tools that they can use at your expense. Say, the ability to shut down 50 newspapers a year that they don't like, or seizing all guns in a state of their choice every year. That's essentially what's going on here.RaceBannon said:
NN had a life of about 12 months at best. It is irrelevant other than as an issue to argue over at HHoregonblitzkrieg said:
The real question is, why do you want to pay more, when you don't have to? Leave well enough alone. The net was perfectly fine under NN. NN makes it so that all traffic is considered equal, ISPs cannot slow or speed up traffic to individual sites deliberately. Repealing NN is a huge step backward, not forward. It won't add any real competition to the mix, even though they're putting out a big sign that says "Hey ISPs, look at this new way you can fuck the consumr over!!!111!" It will only result in new sites being throttled before they can even get off the ground. How much innovation will be lose there? Some of the greatest thoughts, ideas and innovations originated in basements and garages. Some of those innovations will be lost if we lose the free internet. Read a little about Ajit Pai, and you'll soon realize what a stupid fucktard we have running the FCC.RaceBannon said:You pay more for access to programming every day or do you think you're basic cable package is as good as it gets?
Nothing will ever stay the same. You get low prices to get you to dump satellite or cable and watch TV on line then the price goes up
Welcome to capitalism baby
If everyone cuts the cord the cordless price is going up with or without NN or any other N
The solution is competition. Don't tell me how we can't do it tell me how we fucking can. That's how I roll bitch
The only way that is true is if the government is rigging the game -
It's already been explained in this thread.RedRocket said:
Explain why or GTFO. No platitudes.PurpleJ said:
You don't get it. At. All.RedRocket said:
Look at what happened to Google fiber. They've quit going forward with the wires and poles expansion model because it was too expensive. The government wasn't the problem. In Nashville their city council actually passed legislation to make it cheaper and easier for Google fiber to connect to existing utility poles but ATT and Comcast fought it tooth and nail. This was pretty much the story in every market that Google fiber tried to enter. The encumbent ISP tried to make it expensive and prohibitive as possible for Google to connect to existing infrastructure.RaceBannon said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
It would be great if competition were always the answer, but it isn't in cases where the barriers to entry are so prohibitive that new competition doesn't materialize. Giving ISPs new means to fuck you over is not the answer. Governments suck. I hate the government most of the time. How about we spur some innovation and competition, and get more than one government competing for our bidness. Lets attract this new competition by giving the government some cool new tools that they can use at your expense. Say, the ability to shut down 50 newspapers a year that they don't like, or seizing all guns in a state of their choice every year. That's essentially what's going on here.RaceBannon said:
NN had a life of about 12 months at best. It is irrelevant other than as an issue to argue over at HHoregonblitzkrieg said:
The real question is, why do you want to pay more, when you don't have to? Leave well enough alone. The net was perfectly fine under NN. NN makes it so that all traffic is considered equal, ISPs cannot slow or speed up traffic to individual sites deliberately. Repealing NN is a huge step backward, not forward. It won't add any real competition to the mix, even though they're putting out a big sign that says "Hey ISPs, look at this new way you can fuck the consumr over!!!111!" It will only result in new sites being throttled before they can even get off the ground. How much innovation will be lose there? Some of the greatest thoughts, ideas and innovations originated in basements and garages. Some of those innovations will be lost if we lose the free internet. Read a little about Ajit Pai, and you'll soon realize what a stupid fucktard we have running the FCC.RaceBannon said:You pay more for access to programming every day or do you think you're basic cable package is as good as it gets?
Nothing will ever stay the same. You get low prices to get you to dump satellite or cable and watch TV on line then the price goes up
Welcome to capitalism baby
If everyone cuts the cord the cordless price is going up with or without NN or any other N
The solution is competition. Don't tell me how we can't do it tell me how we fucking can. That's how I roll bitch
The only way that is true is if the government is rigging the game -
Explain it again. I didn't get your argument the first time. Maybe it's because you don't have one that makes logical sense.PurpleJ said:
It's already been explained in this thread.RedRocket said:
Explain why or GTFO. No platitudes.PurpleJ said:
You don't get it. At. All.RedRocket said:
Look at what happened to Google fiber. They've quit going forward with the wires and poles expansion model because it was too expensive. The government wasn't the problem. In Nashville their city council actually passed legislation to make it cheaper and easier for Google fiber to connect to existing utility poles but ATT and Comcast fought it tooth and nail. This was pretty much the story in every market that Google fiber tried to enter. The encumbent ISP tried to make it expensive and prohibitive as possible for Google to connect to existing infrastructure.RaceBannon said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
It would be great if competition were always the answer, but it isn't in cases where the barriers to entry are so prohibitive that new competition doesn't materialize. Giving ISPs new means to fuck you over is not the answer. Governments suck. I hate the government most of the time. How about we spur some innovation and competition, and get more than one government competing for our bidness. Lets attract this new competition by giving the government some cool new tools that they can use at your expense. Say, the ability to shut down 50 newspapers a year that they don't like, or seizing all guns in a state of their choice every year. That's essentially what's going on here.RaceBannon said:
NN had a life of about 12 months at best. It is irrelevant other than as an issue to argue over at HHoregonblitzkrieg said:
The real question is, why do you want to pay more, when you don't have to? Leave well enough alone. The net was perfectly fine under NN. NN makes it so that all traffic is considered equal, ISPs cannot slow or speed up traffic to individual sites deliberately. Repealing NN is a huge step backward, not forward. It won't add any real competition to the mix, even though they're putting out a big sign that says "Hey ISPs, look at this new way you can fuck the consumr over!!!111!" It will only result in new sites being throttled before they can even get off the ground. How much innovation will be lose there? Some of the greatest thoughts, ideas and innovations originated in basements and garages. Some of those innovations will be lost if we lose the free internet. Read a little about Ajit Pai, and you'll soon realize what a stupid fucktard we have running the FCC.RaceBannon said:You pay more for access to programming every day or do you think you're basic cable package is as good as it gets?
Nothing will ever stay the same. You get low prices to get you to dump satellite or cable and watch TV on line then the price goes up
Welcome to capitalism baby
If everyone cuts the cord the cordless price is going up with or without NN or any other N
The solution is competition. Don't tell me how we can't do it tell me how we fucking can. That's how I roll bitch
The only way that is true is if the government is rigging the game -
Lay off Race's schtick.PurpleJ said:
It's already been explained in this thread.RedRocket said:
Explain why or GTFO. No platitudes.PurpleJ said:
You don't get it. At. All.RedRocket said:
Look at what happened to Google fiber. They've quit going forward with the wires and poles expansion model because it was too expensive. The government wasn't the problem. In Nashville their city council actually passed legislation to make it cheaper and easier for Google fiber to connect to existing utility poles but ATT and Comcast fought it tooth and nail. This was pretty much the story in every market that Google fiber tried to enter. The encumbent ISP tried to make it expensive and prohibitive as possible for Google to connect to existing infrastructure.RaceBannon said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
It would be great if competition were always the answer, but it isn't in cases where the barriers to entry are so prohibitive that new competition doesn't materialize. Giving ISPs new means to fuck you over is not the answer. Governments suck. I hate the government most of the time. How about we spur some innovation and competition, and get more than one government competing for our bidness. Lets attract this new competition by giving the government some cool new tools that they can use at your expense. Say, the ability to shut down 50 newspapers a year that they don't like, or seizing all guns in a state of their choice every year. That's essentially what's going on here.RaceBannon said:
NN had a life of about 12 months at best. It is irrelevant other than as an issue to argue over at HHoregonblitzkrieg said:
The real question is, why do you want to pay more, when you don't have to? Leave well enough alone. The net was perfectly fine under NN. NN makes it so that all traffic is considered equal, ISPs cannot slow or speed up traffic to individual sites deliberately. Repealing NN is a huge step backward, not forward. It won't add any real competition to the mix, even though they're putting out a big sign that says "Hey ISPs, look at this new way you can fuck the consumr over!!!111!" It will only result in new sites being throttled before they can even get off the ground. How much innovation will be lose there? Some of the greatest thoughts, ideas and innovations originated in basements and garages. Some of those innovations will be lost if we lose the free internet. Read a little about Ajit Pai, and you'll soon realize what a stupid fucktard we have running the FCC.RaceBannon said:You pay more for access to programming every day or do you think you're basic cable package is as good as it gets?
Nothing will ever stay the same. You get low prices to get you to dump satellite or cable and watch TV on line then the price goes up
Welcome to capitalism baby
If everyone cuts the cord the cordless price is going up with or without NN or any other N
The solution is competition. Don't tell me how we can't do it tell me how we fucking can. That's how I roll bitch
The only way that is true is if the government is rigging the game -
J is getting SLAUGHTERED in this thread.
-
WTGWT
