Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Puka Nacua, 2019 4* WR, Orem, UT (Committed)

1…9798100102103…162

Comments

  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    HuskyClaws said:

    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    UW loses a QB
    Disagree.

    Publications are also lazy and assume that teams that return a QB will be better (like UW in 2018) and teams that lose a QB would be worse. We were ranked like top 5 or something by a lot of places just because of Browning returning.

    There will be growing pains with the new qb.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Domicillo
    Domicillo Member Posts: 3,025
    edited February 2019
    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    HFNY said:

    I like their DC and OL. I'm not really a Herbert fan and think their fans are undervaluing what DJ Mitchell and the defensive losses brought to the table.

    I don't think Herbert will play well in Husky Stadium and will face an improved pass-rush to boot.

    Btw, is Cristobol on FSU's list if Willie craps the bed again?

    Oregon is learning to win again. Talent helps and a defense that doesn’t need the offense clicking to play well. The defense stepped up at the end of the year and will be better next year.
    They got worse as the season went on with a QB who's a projected top-10 pick. Herbert regressed in his third year and lost his only reliable target to throw to. Ducks were gargling Leavitt's nuts after his first year and said Oregon's defense would be one of the best if not the best in the conference last season. Oregon's defense got worse and ranked #55 in the nation in total defense. Oregon lost three of their top defensive players from that defense in Jelks, Hollins, and Amadi. How will they get better without those guys when they got worse with them.
    Herbert’s regression has more to do with injuries and depth.

    Do you really think losing 4 players in the two deep (including Apelu) on defense is going to cause regression? We will be better in every unit.


    Do you have two separate mouths or just are able to talk out of your asshole too?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    Domicillo said:

    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    HFNY said:

    I like their DC and OL. I'm not really a Herbert fan and think their fans are undervaluing what DJ Mitchell and the defensive losses brought to the table.

    I don't think Herbert will play well in Husky Stadium and will face an improved pass-rush to boot.

    Btw, is Cristobol on FSU's list if Willie craps the bed again?

    Oregon is learning to win again. Talent helps and a defense that doesn’t need the offense clicking to play well. The defense stepped up at the end of the year and will be better next year.
    They got worse as the season went on with a QB who's a projected top-10 pick. Herbert regressed in his third year and lost his only reliable target to throw to. Ducks were gargling Leavitt's nuts after his first year and said Oregon's defense would be one of the best if not the best in the conference last season. Oregon's defense got worse and ranked #55 in the nation in total defense. Oregon lost three of their top defensive players from that defense in Jelks, Hollins, and Amadi. How will they get better without those guys when they got worse with them.
    Herbert’s regression has more to do with injuries and depth.

    Do you really think losing 4 players in the two deep (including Apelu) on defense is going to cause regression? We will be better in every unit.


    Do you have two separate mouths or just are able to talk out of your asshole too?
    Context is king. I was responding to the poster about losing a WR. UW is losing a qb and rb. Also, these two statements aren’t contradictory. OREGON LOSES LESS THAN WASHINGTON!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    lawsandl said:

    Domicillo said:

    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    HFNY said:

    I like their DC and OL. I'm not really a Herbert fan and think their fans are undervaluing what DJ Mitchell and the defensive losses brought to the table.

    I don't think Herbert will play well in Husky Stadium and will face an improved pass-rush to boot.

    Btw, is Cristobol on FSU's list if Willie craps the bed again?

    Oregon is learning to win again. Talent helps and a defense that doesn’t need the offense clicking to play well. The defense stepped up at the end of the year and will be better next year.
    They got worse as the season went on with a QB who's a projected top-10 pick. Herbert regressed in his third year and lost his only reliable target to throw to. Ducks were gargling Leavitt's nuts after his first year and said Oregon's defense would be one of the best if not the best in the conference last season. Oregon's defense got worse and ranked #55 in the nation in total defense. Oregon lost three of their top defensive players from that defense in Jelks, Hollins, and Amadi. How will they get better without those guys when they got worse with them.
    Herbert’s regression has more to do with injuries and depth.

    Do you really think losing 4 players in the two deep (including Apelu) on defense is going to cause regression? We will be better in every unit.


    Do you have two separate mouths or just are able to talk out of your asshole too?
    Context is king. I was responding to the poster about losing a WR. UW is losing a qb and rb. Also, these two statements aren’t contradictory. OREGON LOSES LESS THAN WASHINGTON!
    1 us?


    4 you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    Baseman said:

    lawsandl said:

    Domicillo said:

    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    HFNY said:

    I like their DC and OL. I'm not really a Herbert fan and think their fans are undervaluing what DJ Mitchell and the defensive losses brought to the table.

    I don't think Herbert will play well in Husky Stadium and will face an improved pass-rush to boot.

    Btw, is Cristobol on FSU's list if Willie craps the bed again?

    Oregon is learning to win again. Talent helps and a defense that doesn’t need the offense clicking to play well. The defense stepped up at the end of the year and will be better next year.
    They got worse as the season went on with a QB who's a projected top-10 pick. Herbert regressed in his third year and lost his only reliable target to throw to. Ducks were gargling Leavitt's nuts after his first year and said Oregon's defense would be one of the best if not the best in the conference last season. Oregon's defense got worse and ranked #55 in the nation in total defense. Oregon lost three of their top defensive players from that defense in Jelks, Hollins, and Amadi. How will they get better without those guys when they got worse with them.
    Herbert’s regression has more to do with injuries and depth.

    Do you really think losing 4 players in the two deep (including Apelu) on defense is going to cause regression? We will be better in every unit.


    Do you have two separate mouths or just are able to talk out of your asshole too?
    Context is king. I was responding to the poster about losing a WR. UW is losing a qb and rb. Also, these two statements aren’t contradictory. OREGON LOSES LESS THAN WASHINGTON!
    1 us?


    4 you
    We lose 4 on defense in the two deep.

    We lose 1 on offense.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,413 Founders Club
    lawsandl said:

    Baseman said:

    lawsandl said:

    Domicillo said:

    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    HFNY said:

    I like their DC and OL. I'm not really a Herbert fan and think their fans are undervaluing what DJ Mitchell and the defensive losses brought to the table.

    I don't think Herbert will play well in Husky Stadium and will face an improved pass-rush to boot.

    Btw, is Cristobol on FSU's list if Willie craps the bed again?

    Oregon is learning to win again. Talent helps and a defense that doesn’t need the offense clicking to play well. The defense stepped up at the end of the year and will be better next year.
    They got worse as the season went on with a QB who's a projected top-10 pick. Herbert regressed in his third year and lost his only reliable target to throw to. Ducks were gargling Leavitt's nuts after his first year and said Oregon's defense would be one of the best if not the best in the conference last season. Oregon's defense got worse and ranked #55 in the nation in total defense. Oregon lost three of their top defensive players from that defense in Jelks, Hollins, and Amadi. How will they get better without those guys when they got worse with them.
    Herbert’s regression has more to do with injuries and depth.

    Do you really think losing 4 players in the two deep (including Apelu) on defense is going to cause regression? We will be better in every unit.


    Do you have two separate mouths or just are able to talk out of your asshole too?
    Context is king. I was responding to the poster about losing a WR. UW is losing a qb and rb. Also, these two statements aren’t contradictory. OREGON LOSES LESS THAN WASHINGTON!
    1 us?


    4 you
    We lose 4 on defense in the two deep.

    We lose 1 on offense.



    Awful on the road. That's coaching, not a product of a young team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    Baseman said:

    lawsandl said:

    Domicillo said:

    lawsandl said:

    ntxduck said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    For the record Gaskin outran Ahmed straight up when they raced.

    You can claim "game speed" differences but

    lawsandl said:

    RaceBannon said:

    lawsandl said:

    Oregon is pretty much favored next year. That and give Mario another class like this and it’s game over.

    Off season natty confirmed
    It’s really simple. We return all but 4 starters and get an infusion of talent. Likewise, looks like Cristobal is making a home run hire at WR coach. UW probably falls off a bit. It’s on paper but I am not making this shit up.
    All those starters that came in fourth in the division last year? Seems unstoppable.

    I didn’t say Oregon will be unstoppable. The fourth place argument is a bit disingenuous considering the margins were very thin last year. When you look at who’s returning what, Oregon is the favorite. However, I still expect thin margins.
    Washington’s schedule (Oregon at home) compared to Oregon’s (Stanford usc and Washington on the road) make Washington the favorite. And we (?) still don’t have any proven receivers
    Schedule is in UW’s favor. However, UW loses a QB and RB and a lot more on defense. There’s many publications echoing the same sentiment.
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    HFNY said:

    I like their DC and OL. I'm not really a Herbert fan and think their fans are undervaluing what DJ Mitchell and the defensive losses brought to the table.

    I don't think Herbert will play well in Husky Stadium and will face an improved pass-rush to boot.

    Btw, is Cristobol on FSU's list if Willie craps the bed again?

    Oregon is learning to win again. Talent helps and a defense that doesn’t need the offense clicking to play well. The defense stepped up at the end of the year and will be better next year.
    They got worse as the season went on with a QB who's a projected top-10 pick. Herbert regressed in his third year and lost his only reliable target to throw to. Ducks were gargling Leavitt's nuts after his first year and said Oregon's defense would be one of the best if not the best in the conference last season. Oregon's defense got worse and ranked #55 in the nation in total defense. Oregon lost three of their top defensive players from that defense in Jelks, Hollins, and Amadi. How will they get better without those guys when they got worse with them.
    Herbert’s regression has more to do with injuries and depth.

    Do you really think losing 4 players in the two deep (including Apelu) on defense is going to cause regression? We will be better in every unit.


    Do you have two separate mouths or just are able to talk out of your asshole too?
    Context is king. I was responding to the poster about losing a WR. UW is losing a qb and rb. Also, these two statements aren’t contradictory. OREGON LOSES LESS THAN WASHINGTON!
    1 us?


    4 you
    We lose 4 on defense in the two deep.

    We lose 1 on offense.



    Awful on the road. That's coaching, not a product of a young team.
    What do you call 9-4 with your 5th recruiting class?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter