Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Recruiting rankings don't matter
Comments
-
Yeah but still........FremontTroll said:
I think you're referring to 2014 not 2013 but your premise lies on the faulty assumption that the 2014 results are repeatable. And you're also assuming that the 2017 and 2018 classes won't be as successful despite being better on paper- that is yet to be determined.Ice_Holmvik said:
That was a Petersen class when he didnt have the pressure and access to all 4-5 star kids. That class was littered with nfl players. I sometimes wonder if Petersen wishes he could recruit his old way and rely on his eye for talent and the staffs development.AIRWOLF said:
They don't matter to Petersen, that's true.GrundleStiltzkin said:
If you look at the number of future NFL players that were on those 2009 and 2010 Boise teams and compare them to their recruiting rankings and then reference the above chart, you'll come to some interesting conclusions.
Also, if you look at the 2013 recruiting class that had an average rating of 87.22, that would imply that 13% of those 22 recruits should have made the NFL. That's just under 3 NFL players. Where are we right now? Seven, with a chance to get to nine or ten, depending on whether some of the free agents stick?
And yes, I know it was shtick. I am just in focused nerd mode right now. Sorry.
