Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do not fire Mueller

123578

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,278
    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Collusion is not a crime anyway.

    Sledog graduated Order of the Coif from Shitsville State University School of Law. He's pretending like me now.
    So legal eagle isn't it true that normally there is a crime committed and then one looks for a suspect? I have never seen an investigation where you have a suspect but no chargeable crime and you then investigate the suspect for anything with no limit on scope and no statute of limitations until you find one. Sounds like it should maybe be an investigation in Russia or China or something.
    Huh?

    So, where you live, the authorities don't normally investigate on tips or other evidence that the law is, perhaps, being broken?

    > You watch too much T.V.

    > Statute of limitations does not mean what I suspect you think it means.

    You should more often hit the "Preview" button on the bottom right hand side of the box. Wait 15 minutes or so, and if it still makes sense, go ahead and hit the "Post Comment" button. But do try and re-read your thoughts more often, because honestly 99% of it is straight up shit nonsense. I know young children who can reason more critically than you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baphomet
    Baphomet Member Posts: 1,511
    It's funny how the birther/bengazi crowd can't comprehend that the FBI is more interested in investigating Trump than they were in Clinton.

    It's as if the being a trailerpark dwelling Trump voter and having a education over the 8th grade aren't highly correlated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    RaceBannon said:

    I read it on the Internet

    Try one of the other internets next time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Dirty Money on Netflix.

    Episode on Trump history is interesting - and telling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,512 Standard Supporter
    mobey said:

    Dirty Money Money Heist on Netflix.

    Episode on Trump history is interesting - and telling. Some nice tittay shots.

    Voice over dub kind of annoying. Better than subtitles.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,583 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2018
    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Collusion is not a crime anyway.

    Sledog graduated Order of the Coif from Shitsville State University School of Law. He's pretending like me now.
    So legal eagle isn't it true that normally there is a crime committed and then one looks for a suspect? I have never seen an investigation where you have a suspect but no chargeable crime and you then investigate the suspect for anything with no limit on scope and no statute of limitations until you find one. Sounds like it should maybe be an investigation in Russia or China or something.
    Huh?

    So, where you live, the authorities don't normally investigate on tips or other evidence that the law is, perhaps, being broken?

    > You watch too much T.V.

    > Statute of limitations does not mean what I suspect you think it means.

    You should more often hit the "Preview" button on the bottom right hand side of the box. Wait 15 minutes or so, and if it still makes sense, go ahead and hit the "Post Comment" button. But do try and re-read your thoughts more often, because honestly 99% of it is straight up shit nonsense. I know young children who can reason more critically than you.
    We aren't talking quite normal here. We're talking about the president of the United States. We're also talking about a "tip" that was faked and the powers that be knew it. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,278
    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Collusion is not a crime anyway.

    Sledog graduated Order of the Coif from Shitsville State University School of Law. He's pretending like me now.
    So legal eagle isn't it true that normally there is a crime committed and then one looks for a suspect? I have never seen an investigation where you have a suspect but no chargeable crime and you then investigate the suspect for anything with no limit on scope and no statute of limitations until you find one. Sounds like it should maybe be an investigation in Russia or China or something.
    Huh?

    So, where you live, the authorities don't normally investigate on tips or other evidence that the law is, perhaps, being broken?

    > You watch too much T.V.

    > Statute of limitations does not mean what I suspect you think it means.

    You should more often hit the "Preview" button on the bottom right hand side of the box. Wait 15 minutes or so, and if it still makes sense, go ahead and hit the "Post Comment" button. But do try and re-read your thoughts more often, because honestly 99% of it is straight up shit nonsense. I know young children who can reason more critically than you.
    We aren't talking quite normal here. We're talking about the president of the United States. We're also talking about a "tip" that was faked and the powers that be knew it. HTH
    I think even the resident Trump guys would advise you to LIPO just a little before sticking your neck out too far with conjecture. That warrant got through a lot of conservative nets. There is also a piece by a WP guy who explains the privilege issue, and what it takes to breach it, along with the steps required to take the investigation in a new direction. IOW, a lot of people had to sign off. If the whole lot of them is corrupt, then so be it. I just don't know that.

    Like I said, I genuinely hope it's nothing-to-see-here, because no good will come from it. But I'm not betting the house. All indications are that Cohen was the Trump's dirty deeds lawyer, which could include more than stormy $$. He uses the Ivy League guys for the up and up deals. Cohen seems like the hungry guy who couldn't get hired at Cravath and would do "other" shit for him.

    If there's no there there, then great. We shall see.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Collusion is not a crime anyway.

    Sledog graduated Order of the Coif from Shitsville State University School of Law. He's pretending like me now.
    So legal eagle isn't it true that normally there is a crime committed and then one looks for a suspect? I have never seen an investigation where you have a suspect but no chargeable crime and you then investigate the suspect for anything with no limit on scope and no statute of limitations until you find one. Sounds like it should maybe be an investigation in Russia or China or something.
    Huh?

    So, where you live, the authorities don't normally investigate on tips or other evidence that the law is, perhaps, being broken?

    > You watch too much T.V.

    > Statute of limitations does not mean what I suspect you think it means.

    You should more often hit the "Preview" button on the bottom right hand side of the box. Wait 15 minutes or so, and if it still makes sense, go ahead and hit the "Post Comment" button. But do try and re-read your thoughts more often, because honestly 99% of it is straight up shit nonsense. I know young children who can reason more critically than you.
    We aren't talking quite normal here. We're talking about the president of the United States. We're also talking about a "tip" that was faked and the powers that be knew it. HTH
    I think even the resident Trump guys would advise you to LIPO just a little before sticking your neck out too far with conjecture. That warrant got through a lot of conservative nets. There is also a piece by a WP guy who explains the privilege issue, and what it takes to breach it, along with the steps required to take the investigation in a new direction. IOW, a lot of people had to sign off. If the whole lot of them is corrupt, then so be it. I just don't know that.

    Like I said, I genuinely hope it's nothing-to-see-here, because no good will come from it. But I'm not betting the house. All indications are that Cohen was the Trump's dirty deeds lawyer, which could include more than stormy $$. He uses the Ivy League guys for the up and up deals. Cohen seems like the hungry guy who couldn't get hired at Cravath and would do "other" shit for him.

    If there's no there there, then great. We shall see.
    https://youtu.be/onE43h_TUUY

    https://youtu.be/2sky1tt8vLA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,583 Standard Supporter
    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    creepycoug said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Collusion is not a crime anyway.

    Sledog graduated Order of the Coif from Shitsville State University School of Law. He's pretending like me now.
    So legal eagle isn't it true that normally there is a crime committed and then one looks for a suspect? I have never seen an investigation where you have a suspect but no chargeable crime and you then investigate the suspect for anything with no limit on scope and no statute of limitations until you find one. Sounds like it should maybe be an investigation in Russia or China or something.
    Huh?

    So, where you live, the authorities don't normally investigate on tips or other evidence that the law is, perhaps, being broken?

    > You watch too much T.V.

    > Statute of limitations does not mean what I suspect you think it means.

    You should more often hit the "Preview" button on the bottom right hand side of the box. Wait 15 minutes or so, and if it still makes sense, go ahead and hit the "Post Comment" button. But do try and re-read your thoughts more often, because honestly 99% of it is straight up shit nonsense. I know young children who can reason more critically than you.
    We aren't talking quite normal here. We're talking about the president of the United States. We're also talking about a "tip" that was faked and the powers that be knew it. HTH
    I think even the resident Trump guys would advise you to LIPO just a little before sticking your neck out too far with conjecture. That warrant got through a lot of conservative nets. There is also a piece by a WP guy who explains the privilege issue, and what it takes to breach it, along with the steps required to take the investigation in a new direction. IOW, a lot of people had to sign off. If the whole lot of them is corrupt, then so be it. I just don't know that.

    Like I said, I genuinely hope it's nothing-to-see-here, because no good will come from it. But I'm not betting the house. All indications are that Cohen was the Trump's dirty deeds lawyer, which could include more than stormy $$. He uses the Ivy League guys for the up and up deals. Cohen seems like the hungry guy who couldn't get hired at Cravath and would do "other" shit for him.

    If there's no there there, then great. We shall see.
    Judges to sign warrants is very much like shopping for hookers. Easy to find one's with certain traits. Anti-Trump would be like shopping for a blow job.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter