Damn just two bad quarters

RaceBannon

Sark was on Petros and Money today. Turns out the 4th quarter against Oregon and the 2nd quarter against ASU are all that stands between us and a game against Bama because we beat Stanford.

Blah blah blah scintillating talk bull shit

RaceBannon

Plus we're 10-3 and the kids have fun

SweatpantsGeneral

That's scintillating. Take notice Sven.

PurpleJ

We want Bama

TTJ

Apparently Petros missed the second quarter of the Oregon game. And the entire first half of the Stanford game. And three quarters of the ASU game.

I hope he watches the UCLA game. Any quarter will do. Commencing thunderfuck in T-minus 73 hours...

TTJ

No. Maybe. No. No. Guy. Sure.

MisterEm

Pool boy and Sark make a perfect political couple.

Sell the hope and change.

RaceBannon

TTJ said:

Apparently Petros missed the second quarter of the Oregon game. And the entire first half of the Stanford game. And three quarters of the ASU game.

I hope he watches the UCLA game. Any quarter will do. Commencing thunderfuck in T-minus 73 hours...

I was quoting Sark

MikeDamone

So we a 8-1?

TTJ

RaceBannon said:

TTJ said:

Apparently Petros missed the second quarter of the Oregon game. And the entire first half of the Stanford game. And three quarters of the ASU game.

I hope he watches the UCLA game. Any quarter will do. Commencing thunderfuck in T-minus 73 hours...

I was quoting Sark

Christ. I'm pretty sure he was there for those, right?

Haid_D_Salaami

So by that logic, since realistically UCLA only had like 2 "bad qtrs".....Friday's game should be for the mythical Natty?


YES! We're back!

Homebrew_Dawg

Sark plays the hypocrite well. When first asked about the USC coaching vacancy after Kiffin was fired, Sark said he doesn't deal in hypotheticals. Yet, every season his hypothetical W-L record at WA is much better than actual. What, hypothetically, is this POS really worth? What will it take to be rid of him?

Haid_D_Salaami

Homebrew_Dawg said:

What will it take to be rid of him?

Or 0-12......take your pick

[Deleted User]

What's really reflective of Sark is the fact that he believes a quarter doesn't represent an entire game. Like somehow the 4th Q vs Oregon and the 2nd vs ASU were aberrations.

What if there were only 2 halves, does that change the game at all Sark? Fuck, this guy is stupid.

Mosster47

This sounds like Quooks!

"If Mariota doesn't under throw Huff!"
"If that phantom PI was't called!"
"If Mariota was healthy"

Don't mention the fucking dive play they ran 50 times for a billion yards. Forget it was 26-0 with 10 minutes left to go.

If you church up losing you're a fucking loser, period.

Meek

sounds hypothetical.

topdawgnc

Absolutely, and then once more for good measure. For sure. Yes. Yes. No. Without a doubt.

dnc

topdawgnc said:

Absolutely, and then once more for good measure. For sure. Yes. Yes. No. Without a doubt.

disagree

I don't think you know how this works.

AZDuck

Craves it, craves it, no, maybe, craves it, can be persuaded