Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Outside of QB, at which position group are we most overrated by Doogs and the Media?

13567

Comments

  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,367
    OL

    Bread said:

    Since we are bashing on Gaskin...

    You all are wrong His main flaw is not having enough long runs.

    But he does not consistently get long runs like other big name backs. Saquon, Barkley ronald Jones, Stanford back 1, etc. All have 40+ yard runs nearly every week. While gaskin hardly ever gets a run longer then 20 yards and only has 9 runs over 40 yards

    2015
    78 vs sac state.
    72 vs oregon
    53 vs asu
    86 vs southern miss
    2016
    68 vs Oregon
    45 vs asu
    2017
    57 vs colorado
    43 vs wsu
    69 vs Penn state

    Uh, Gaskin ran for more yards over 3 years than Barkley. But what do stats matter anyway.
    He’s a small slow RB. GTFO
  • Neighbor2972Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,321
    LB
    This thread needs to die
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited March 2018
    Baseman said:

    Bread said:

    Since we are bashing on Gaskin...

    You all are wrong His main flaw is not having enough long runs.

    But he does not consistently get long runs like other big name backs. Saquon, Barkley ronald Jones, Stanford back 1, etc. All have 40+ yard runs nearly every week. While gaskin hardly ever gets a run longer then 20 yards and only has 9 runs over 40 yards

    2015
    78 vs sac state.
    72 vs oregon
    53 vs asu
    86 vs southern miss
    2016
    68 vs Oregon
    45 vs asu
    2017
    57 vs colorado
    43 vs wsu
    69 vs Penn state

    Uh, Gaskin ran for more yards over 3 years than Barkley. But what do stats matter anyway.
    He’s a small slow RB. GTFO
    Gaskin has much better patience and vision out of nothing than Barkley...frankly Saquan struggled there. It's why he had so many games under 100 yds rushing vs descent teams (not us of course).
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,240 Standard Supporter
    OL needs more consistency. Seems someone misses an assignment every other play.
  • ZombieBallzZombieBallz Member Posts: 78
    RB
    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
  • ZombieBallzZombieBallz Member Posts: 78
    RB
    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
    By that definition SC hasn't had an elite RB since Reggie Bush yet you say they have better backfields every year than Gaskin/Ahmed?

    You're talking out of your ass. Again.

    Fuck off.
    I said USC had a better back field than Gaskin and Ahmed last year and they no doubt have a more talented RB corps right now than we do. And you're right. They haven't had an elite back since Reggie. Ronald Jones and Stephen Carr will both go in the top two rounds though, bitch.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,789
    LB

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
    By that definition SC hasn't had an elite RB since Reggie Bush yet you say they have better backfields every year than Gaskin/Ahmed?

    You're talking out of your ass. Again.

    Fuck off.
    I said USC had a better back field than Gaskin and Ahmed last year and they no doubt have a more talented RB corps right now than we do. And you're right. They haven't had an elite back since Reggie. Ronald Jones and Stephen Carr will both go in the top two rounds though, bitch.
    "It's a really good backfield and might be the best we've ever had but teams like Bama, Georgia, Ohio State, and USC have better backfields than that every year."

    hth
  • ZombieBallzZombieBallz Member Posts: 78
    RB
    Doogles said:

    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
    Sankey was 1st overall RB taken in early 2nd Rd. By your definition he was elite.

    Gaskin has been better than Sankey by pretty much every metric at UW.

    Sankey was elite and better than Gaskin. He ran for 1800+ yards running behind a shit Sark O-line.
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,602 Founders Club
    OL

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
    By that definition SC hasn't had an elite RB since Reggie Bush yet you say they have better backfields every year than Gaskin/Ahmed?

    You're talking out of your ass. Again.

    Fuck off.
    I said USC had a better back field than Gaskin and Ahmed last year and they no doubt have a more talented RB corps right now than we do. And you're right. They haven't had an elite back since Reggie. Ronald Jones and Stephen Carr will both go in the top two rounds though, bitch.
    Where do you think Salvon will be drafted? I think he's better than Gaskin and will go top two after his Jr. Year.
  • ZombieBallzZombieBallz Member Posts: 78
    RB
    Doogles said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
    By that definition SC hasn't had an elite RB since Reggie Bush yet you say they have better backfields every year than Gaskin/Ahmed?

    You're talking out of your ass. Again.

    Fuck off.
    I said USC had a better back field than Gaskin and Ahmed last year and they no doubt have a more talented RB corps right now than we do. And you're right. They haven't had an elite back since Reggie. Ronald Jones and Stephen Carr will both go in the top two rounds though, bitch.
    Where do you think Salvon will be drafted? I think he's better than Gaskin and will go top two after his Jr. Year.
    I agree. Salvon is elite. Now you're catching on.
  • ZombieBallzZombieBallz Member Posts: 78
    RB
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    @BallzDeep hate for Gaskin continues through his brethren @ZombieBallz

    Gaskin would be on a 53 man roster in the NFL this year if he wanted. That makes him college elite.

    No it doesn't. RB's who get drafted in the first and second round were college elite.
    By that definition SC hasn't had an elite RB since Reggie Bush yet you say they have better backfields every year than Gaskin/Ahmed?

    You're talking out of your ass. Again.

    Fuck off.
    I said USC had a better back field than Gaskin and Ahmed last year and they no doubt have a more talented RB corps right now than we do. And you're right. They haven't had an elite back since Reggie. Ronald Jones and Stephen Carr will both go in the top two rounds though, bitch.
    "It's a really good backfield and might be the best we've ever had but teams like Bama, Georgia, Ohio State, and USC have better backfields than that every year."

    hth
    USC does have a better backfield than us every year.
  • ZombieBallzZombieBallz Member Posts: 78
    RB
    Doogles said:

    Basically you're entire argument boils down to an obsession with NFL measurables over production.

    That's why you think Chris Warren is still better than Gaskin.

    I get it now.

    No, if you remember I said before Chris Warren gained a bunch of weight and tried playing RB at 250 pounds he was better than Gaskin. Today Gaskin is better than him because he got too big. But yes, USC having a RB corps with overall better NFL talent than we have makes their RB corps better than ours. It's so simple yet you dumb ass doogs have a difficult time understanding.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,023
    RB
    Sankey probably would have started for Oregon State or wsu
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,602 Founders Club
    OL
    Just because you have the measurables doesn't mean you're good at football. Gaskin is an elite runner at the college level. Defenses are scared of him.

    Dewayne Washington had the NFL measurables and has stuck with the Lions as a result. Gaskin as a true frosh ran him out of town. People forget that.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    OL
    Zombieballz what is your opinion on big backs?
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,023
    RB
    Doogles said:

    Just because you have the measurables doesn't mean you're good at football. Gaskin is an elite runner at the college level. Defenses are scared of him.

    Dewayne Washington had the NFL measurables and has stuck with the Lions as a result. Gaskin as a true frosh ran him out of town. People forget that.

    Correction


    Defenses are scared that they'll give the ball to someone besides Jake Browning
Sign In or Register to comment.