Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Putin's bitch
Comments
-
Before the fucking #metoo bandwagon bullshit, that's cause for high fives all around.CuntWaffle said:
Yea but did you hear he had sex with a porn star? Bet you didn't even consider that....greenblood said:My stocks are up 128% since election night
My taxes are going down
Most news anchors across the country are still triggered
Ozone went missing
Insinceredawg is about to be committed
Hondo has gone on a spamming spree
Trump was right...
I'm getting tired of winning
HighFiveEiffelTower.gif
The pendulum will swing back. Make Fucking Porn Stars Great Again!
-
Agree with the bad optics to congratulate Putin now. The rest is partisan and naive. The Russians have been running disinformation and agitprop operations in the US since the 1920s. The Kremlin funneled money to MLK because they thought he was a good bet as a destabilizing force.insinceredawg said:
No but definitely at such a large scale. The fact of the matter is, all 3 of these incidents are in the current news cycle so the timing is awful to congratulate Putin. There was nothing of this magnitude going on at the time of the Obama call.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Holy shit, you truly think 2016 was a first?insinceredawg said:
Remind me again, was that before or after Russia meddled in our elections, hacked our national power grids, and attempted to murdered civilians in our allies' streets?RaceBannon said:
You're still failing at not bringing up Obama or Hillary to defend Trump on Russia. Try harder.
Do you Trumptards realize how FS your logic is in defending Trump?
-Trump does something stupid
-Find a false equivalency related to Obama or Hillary
-Say it's okay for Trump since Obama and Hillary did it
-Rinse and repeat
If you guys hated Obama or Hillary so much, then why are you ok with Trump doing the same thing (btw they're not the same)?
Do you know that nothing was going on when Obama made whatever call you say he did? The large scale, as you say, does not materialize overnight.
I feel certain the Russians have sought to influence every presidential election for decades. The tools they now have make the campaigns more widespread, but also easier to detect. For example, it's hard to know who might have planted a newspaper editorial read by some thousands, which the Russians absolutely have done and continue, but essentially anyone can monitor Twitter activity because it is seen by millions.
The most troubling part of this is not that Russians work to influence our domestic affairs and elections, but that we? are susceptible to it. While popular sentiment continues to believe that Russians "hacked" the election, electronically changing results in the polls somehow, I've seen no credible allegation or incident where that occurred. Instead, it was information, or disinformation. Law enforcement and counterintelligence can only do so much to thwart that in an open society. -
Citizens have a responsibility to check multiple sources for information. If they don't it's on them. Regardless if they were duped by fake news, they still went out and voted. Now if there's proof that the Russians changed actual votes after they were cast, then yes, you have a problem. But again, nothing of the sort has been proven.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree with the bad optics to congratulate Putin now. The rest is partisan and naive. The Russians have been running disinformation and agitprop operations in the US since the 1920s. The Kremlin funneled money to MLK because they thought he was a good bet as a destabilizing force.insinceredawg said:
No but definitely at such a large scale. The fact of the matter is, all 3 of these incidents are in the current news cycle so the timing is awful to congratulate Putin. There was nothing of this magnitude going on at the time of the Obama call.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Holy shit, you truly think 2016 was a first?insinceredawg said:
Remind me again, was that before or after Russia meddled in our elections, hacked our national power grids, and attempted to murdered civilians in our allies' streets?RaceBannon said:
You're still failing at not bringing up Obama or Hillary to defend Trump on Russia. Try harder.
Do you Trumptards realize how FS your logic is in defending Trump?
-Trump does something stupid
-Find a false equivalency related to Obama or Hillary
-Say it's okay for Trump since Obama and Hillary did it
-Rinse and repeat
If you guys hated Obama or Hillary so much, then why are you ok with Trump doing the same thing (btw they're not the same)?
Do you know that nothing was going on when Obama made whatever call you say he did? The large scale, as you say, does not materialize overnight.
I feel certain the Russians have sought to influence every presidential election for decades. The tools they now have make the campaigns more widespread, but also easier to detect. For example, it's hard to know who might have planted a newspaper editorial read by some thousands, which the Russians absolutely have done and continue, but essentially anyone can monitor Twitter activity because it is seen by millions.
The most troubling part of this is not that Russians work to influence our domestic affairs and elections, but that we? are susceptible to it. While popular sentiment continues to believe that Russians "hacked" the election, electronically changing results in the polls somehow, I've seen no credible allegation or incident where that occurred. Instead, it was information, or disinformation. Law enforcement and counterintelligence can only do so much to thwart that in an open society. -
We can avoid this in the future if all you dumbfucks would vote like I do
That's pretty much the message coming from the losers in the world -
It's called diplomacy fuckheads. At the height of the cold war, Regan and Breshnev would call and congratulate each other. Pussy's worry about optics.
-
Are you saying that the 80's called and want their foreign policy back?Dude61 said:It's called diplomacy fuckheads. At the height of the cold war, Regan and Breshnev would call and congratulate each other. Pussy's worry about optics.
-
I'll add to this by saying if you want Russia to be a real threat put them in a corner
Watching VICE News last night they were interviewing some Russian voters and they said they want Russia to be respected and to get more food by getting sanctions lifted (turns out there ARE sanctions)
I actually agree with Obama that Russia isn't a threat but we seem to be hell bent on making them one since Hillary lost
They are Number Two in the world wide we have nukes poll. That will always make them some kind of a threat
China is our enemy -
AbundanceRaceBannon said:I'll add to this by saying if you want Russia to be a real threat put them in a corner
Watching VICE News last night they were interviewing some Russian voters and they said they want Russia to be respected and to get more food by getting sanctions lifted (turns out there ARE sanctions)
I actually agree with Obama that Russia isn't a threat but we seem to be hell bent on making them one since Hillary lost
They are Number Two in the world wide we have nukes poll. That will always make them some kind of a threat
China is our enemy
-
When you're colluding the threat is less.RaceBannon said:
Are you saying that the 80's called and want their foreign policy back?Dude61 said:It's called diplomacy fuckheads. At the height of the cold war, Regan and Breshnev would call and congratulate each other. Pussy's worry about optics.
-
And when your VP crazy Uncle Joe and his kids are raking big jack for Chinese contracts....Sledog said:
When you're colluding the threat is less.RaceBannon said:
Are you saying that the 80's called and want their foreign policy back?Dude61 said:It's called diplomacy fuckheads. At the height of the cold war, Regan and Breshnev would call and congratulate each other. Pussy's worry about optics.
