Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Podcast of Champions in depth series
Comments
-
Colorado = fag
Hope they suck forever
With only Utah as a non threat in the south it's getting tuff
-
I’m not going to listen, but Fetters biggest problem is he always tries to be the smartest guy in the room. That and he’s a pussy who never actually has an opinion.insinceredawg said:As usual, Fatters comes across as a blowhard who loves to hear himself talk. He was by far the worse guest they brought on and that's saying a lot.
Compare the dawgman takes to the ones here. Even the ones you disagree with here are better than the dawgman ones.
It’s amazing to me that there are actual fans who can’t talk honestly about their team and just want pollyanna takes and comments. -
agreed. he always is quick to respond to other peoples' opinions by telling them they're wrong but he never goes out with actual opinions and interpretations of information that you would expect from someone who has the title "editor". He's just a peanut gallery commenter.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not going to listen, but Fetters biggest problem is he always tries to be the smartest guy in the room. That and he’s a pussy who never actually has an opinion.insinceredawg said:As usual, Fatters comes across as a blowhard who loves to hear himself talk. He was by far the worse guest they brought on and that's saying a lot.
Compare the dawgman takes to the ones here. Even the ones you disagree with here are better than the dawgman ones.
It’s amazing to me that there are actual fans who can’t talk honestly about their team and just want pollyanna takes and comments. -
Oh, Fetters has opinions. Just need to ask him the right questions.
or
-
Or?TheHB said:Oh, Fetters has opinions. Just need to ask him the right questions.
or -
I was so excited to hear the UW part. I'll listen to just about anything about the UW. Hell, I'll listen to Dick Baird talk about the kicking game for at least 10 minutes and be happy to hear about UW football.
I got about 8 minutes into the UW thing with Fetters and had to turn it off. That fucking blowhard just talks and talks and seemed like he never answered the fucking question.
And when he did answer, he was usually just so fucking WRONG. How does a guy who covers UW for a living know so little?!? When asked if the UW generally owned its home recruiting territory, my first thought was, "Yeah, other than a few guys here and there." His answer was that historically STANFORD got most of the best guys from Washington, but we are starting to do better. STANFORD?!? Seriously WHAT THE FUCK IS HE TALKING ABOUT? Did he get hit on the head so he's unable to make any long-term memories past when Fozzy chose Stanford?
Washington's yearly goals? Easy, right? "Compete for the Pac-12 championship every year." NOPE. Apparently, since Don James got here our goal is to have the same record as USC, according to FettersFS. I guess when USC was going 6-6, our goal was to go 6-6. And not any better, 'cause that's not what USC did. Maybe it was in a secret meeting, but I've never heard one UW coach express our goals in terms of USC's success. Rose Bowl. Always.
I'm dumber for having listened to as much as I did. -
looks so goodTheHB said:Oh, Fetters has opinions. Just need to ask him the right questions.
or
until you scroll further -
This was actually done in Year 1 of the pod ... it was then realized that by and large nobody gave a shit about 8 of the other 11 schools in the conference.89ute said:dongman said:How much tim does each one run, tim is of the essence with my schedule? I don’t know if I’ll have the tim to listen, But if it’s 30 or less I might dedicate the tim to go in depth on each school.
I'd like to the the TSIO boys step up and do this kind of thing, but for now, podcast of champions is the only one choosing to fill this void. -
http://pac12podcast.com/pac-12-spring-football-updates
This pod from last week is pretty good if you're desperate for some Pac-12 football talk. It's just under two hours. A few things that stood out was Stanford only has some walk on dude QB for spring. How can you hold a spring practice with a QB that will never see the field? Stanford's spring is a total waste.
Chip Kelly's install is going very slowly. UCLA's offense is going to look like Philadelphia's offense during Chips first two years there. I have no clue what that means, I don't know shit about Philly's offense during Kelly's first two years. Pod guys said it will not be like his offense at Oregon. Not nearly as fast paced but kind of fast paced.
USC is fucked at QB. Jack Sears did not complete a single pass during the scrimmage USC pod guy observed. Something like 0 for 6. Fink wasn't much better. Fink's arm strength was only about 2/3rds Browning. High School Senior JT Daniels will probably earn the start when he arrives or a few games into the season, too young to be any good next year. USC guy thinks USC will be heavy on the run.
Arizona spring ball is closed with the exception of a 20 minute observation. Nothing really coming out of AZ.
ASU is going to run a 3 3 5 defense. Someone on staff has some fucking connection with Rocky Long so they're all over this 3 3 5 business. Good luck. Oh ... and Herm is running practices like a pro team, "very loose". Teens and young adults thrive in these "loose" environments. Just axe the US military.
-
So they will win the south then89ute said:High School Senior JT Daniels will probably earn the start when he arrives or a few games into the season, too young to be any good next year. USC guy thinks USC will be heavy on the run.
