An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters
Comments
-
Bump.
At this rate, I'm putting my money on BDTW.com emerging from the grave before these rankings come out. -
I saw @CokeGreaterThanPepsi out in public the other day. So, at least, we know he’s alive.Woof said:Bump.
At this rate, I'm putting my money on BDTW.com emerging from the grave before these rankings come out. -
The off-season is long and dark. Plenty of time for me to get bored and actually get this done.Woof said:Bump.
At this rate, I'm putting my money on BDTW.com emerging from the grave before these rankings come out. -
HurtfulUW_Doog_Bot said:
Still out before BDTW.comBennyBeaver said: -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
-
It's an interesting proposition here. Still, 5 years ago the best post ever that would get 40 chins now would net you three upvotes. It was TUFF sledding back in the day around here.YellowSnow said:
This flipside to this coin is that it takes a while to build a brand, so the old guard has more name brand recognition which leads to more chins and up votes.dnc said:The only real flaw in this analysis is that chin's haven't always existed (nor have their predecessors "loves" I believe). There was a tim long ago on this here bored where the best response you could give to a poast you appreciated was an upvote. This almost assuredly suppresses the more tenured members of the bored's ratios.
Of course, none of this matters so I wouldn't waste 53 seconds trying to figure out a workaround, just thought it was chintriguing and chinteresting chinformation. -
Thoughts and prayersSwaye said:
It's an interesting proposition here. Still, 5 years ago the best post ever that would get 40 chins now would net you three upvotes. It was TUFF sledding back in the day around here.YellowSnow said:
This flipside to this coin is that it takes a while to build a brand, so the old guard has more name brand recognition which leads to more chins and up votes.dnc said:The only real flaw in this analysis is that chin's haven't always existed (nor have their predecessors "loves" I believe). There was a tim long ago on this here bored where the best response you could give to a poast you appreciated was an upvote. This almost assuredly suppresses the more tenured members of the bored's ratios.
Of course, none of this matters so I wouldn't waste 53 seconds trying to figure out a workaround, just thought it was chintriguing and chinteresting chinformation. -
@UW_Doog_Bot my input is yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I highly doubt anyone unseated Pup as most controversial poaster. Ballz was #2 and I've actually been trying to figure out if I should combine @StrongArmCobra and ballz or not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Forget analytics...Pup set the mold and nobody has came close since..not even close. A Legend. Let's find #2...the gap is massive but I'd like to know who battles for positioning at 2-3?
If we still say that a thread got AIDS from Ballz, then his stats should be combined regardless of what handle he’s doubling down shit takes from. -
He may change his name but he definitely patient zero when comes to aidsDoogCourics said:
@UW_Doog_Bot my input is yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I highly doubt anyone unseated Pup as most controversial poaster. Ballz was #2 and I've actually been trying to figure out if I should combine @StrongArmCobra and ballz or not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Forget analytics...Pup set the mold and nobody has came close since..not even close. A Legend. Let's find #2...the gap is massive but I'd like to know who battles for positioning at 2-3?
If we still say that a thread got AIDS from Ballz, then his stats should be combined regardless of what handle he’s doubling down shit takes from. -
I'm sorry I missed the good old days. But better late than never.Swaye said:
It's an interesting proposition here. Still, 5 years ago the best post ever that would get 40 chins now would net you three upvotes. It was TUFF sledding back in the day around here.YellowSnow said:
This flipside to this coin is that it takes a while to build a brand, so the old guard has more name brand recognition which leads to more chins and up votes.dnc said:The only real flaw in this analysis is that chin's haven't always existed (nor have their predecessors "loves" I believe). There was a tim long ago on this here bored where the best response you could give to a poast you appreciated was an upvote. This almost assuredly suppresses the more tenured members of the bored's ratios.
Of course, none of this matters so I wouldn't waste 53 seconds trying to figure out a workaround, just thought it was chintriguing and chinteresting chinformation.
