It’s going to take Chipper a couple years to get the machine rolling and I’m sure you will see a lot of turnover with kids leaving and getting kicked off. Unfortunately Chip can’t knock the soft out of all the current players like Petersen couldn’t get rid of the Sark stench on a lot here. If Chip can’t get it done then UCLA is eternally fucked.
It’s going to take Chipper a couple years to get the machine rolling and I’m sure you will see a lot of turnover with kids leaving and getting kicked off. Unfortunately Chip can’t knock the soft out of all the current players like Petersen couldn’t get rid of the Sark stench on a lot here. If Chip can’t get it done then UCLA is eternally fucked. I am curious to see what chip’s offense will look like. I think the college game has adjusted to his old offense
It's the campus, water, who knows. They have loaded up on top end talent for decades and never done shit. I never even want players who are seriously interested in UCLA because if they like that place they are weak soft fags.TUFF loggers > Charmin soft faggots
I think something that would be interesting would be looking at a school's blue chips, and seeing what schools get the highest percentages of those guys to the draft. UCLA is loaded with blue chips, but don't produce equivalent draft picks. Schools like UW get as many or more draftees despite more blue chips. I think a cool graph would be blue chips per class on the x axis, with draftees on the y. It would show what schools develop those guys and which schools do not. UCLA would be an outlier, and not in a good way.
One chinteresting question is how chip will do In a different culture. At oregon everyone from uncle phil, the state police, student body and the athletic department all the way down to the towel boy were singularly focused on winning. chip benefited from that.Does ucla’s culture reflect that laser-focused unwavering determination?