Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Gee Scott Jr, 4* 2020 WR, Bellevue (Eastside Catholic), WA (Offered 6/19)

16768707273135

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    I don't take it as good news that Huffman is announcing this rather than Gee Jr or Sr, butt we shall see.

    Most committed guys don't broadcast new offers on Twitter. That's the norm.
    Interesting. I've certainly seen a lot of it. But this would make sense as an explanation.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031

    My assumptions/understanding:

    1.) This kid, according to 247FS, is the #2 player in the state, a top-70 player overall in the country, a top-15 receiver in the country, and he's right in UW's backyard. That an offer came this late is not random, "different evaluation," or any of that bullshit. There was something--or somethings--that caused the Washington staff to pass on this kid or he'd have had an offer a year ago.

    2.) The lack of offer, justified or not, has stirred up bad blood between UW and Gee and possibly a few other targets. This damage is done and cannot be unseen.

    3.) There is a less than 0% chance that he decommits from Ohio State and takes Washington up on their offer.

    If all of these things are true, is this offer strategically beneficial? I'm struggling to see the benefit at this point.

    firstly, the fact that Huffman announced and none of the Scotts did is unfortunately not a good look.

    that said.... my guess is that Pete and Gee have been communicating with each other and that this is not a random nor unexpected result. Whether Gee (both of them) give a shit or not is a different question, but I do tend believe that this is something resulting from a private relationship building respect and trust between them.

    Who knows, though.
  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    edited June 2019
    Meek said:

    My assumptions/understanding:

    1.) This kid, according to 247FS, is the #2 player in the state, a top-70 player overall in the country, a top-15 receiver in the country, and he's right in UW's backyard. That an offer came this late is not random, "different evaluation," or any of that bullshit. There was something--or somethings--that caused the Washington staff to pass on this kid or he'd have had an offer a year ago.

    2.) The lack of offer, justified or not, has stirred up bad blood between UW and Gee and possibly a few other targets. This damage is done and cannot be unseen.

    3.) There is a less than 0% chance that he decommits from Ohio State and takes Washington up on their offer.

    If all of these things are true, is this offer strategically beneficial? I'm struggling to see the benefit at this point.

    firstly, the fact that Huffman announced and none of the Scotts did is unfortunately not a good look.

    that said.... my guess is that Pete and Gee have been communicating with each other and that this is not a random nor unexpected result. Whether Gee (both of them) give a shit or not is a different question, but I do tend believe that this is something resulting from a private relationship building respect and trust between them.

    Who knows, though.
    Again, that's not out of the norm and it's what you would expect from an OKG. It's not a bad sign. He's being respectful towards Ohio State. UW commits very rarely announce new offers on Twitter. It's just about being respectful to the the school you're currently committed to. Doesn't mean he's not interested in UW.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    edited June 2019

    My assumptions/understanding:

    1.) This kid, according to 247FS, is the #2 player in the state, a top-70 player overall in the country, a top-15 receiver in the country, and he's right in UW's backyard. That an offer came this late is not random, "different evaluation," or any of that bullshit. There was something--or somethings--that caused the Washington staff to pass on this kid or he'd have had an offer a year ago.

    2.) The lack of offer, justified or not, has stirred up bad blood between UW and Gee and possibly a few other targets. This damage is done and cannot be unseen.

    3.) There is a less than 0% chance that he decommits from Ohio State and takes Washington up on their offer.

    If all of these things are true, is this offer strategically beneficial? I'm struggling to see the benefit at this point.

    I don't accept for a second that #2 is true. This would absolutely help with optics and relationships.
    Only if something changed in a way that explains the offer. Otherwise, it just makes the program look hypocritical.

    Looking at it as ghetto block diagrams:

    [reason for lack of offer] [no offer] [conflict with recruits] ---> time ---> [no change] [no offer] ["we're a principled program sticking to our guns"]

    [reason for lack of offer] [no offer] [conflict with recruits] ---> time ---> [no change] [offer] ["never mind, we were just kidding about that whole 'OKG' thing"]

    [reason for lack of offer] [no offer] [conflict with recruits] ---> time ---> [reason for lack of offer corrected] [offer] ["anybody can be OKG if they're dedicated enough"]

    One of those three is not like the other, and it's not a good look to the other 90+% of the prospects that the program is trying to attract with BFL and OKG and all that bullshit. Unfortunately, it's impossible to know which of these three scenarios it is without knowing the source of the original conflict and the (hopefully) resolution to that concern. And I doubt either of these things nuggets are something that the staff is going to be offering up to recruits, hence the struggle to see the benefit of this.
  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,100
    Sr. Has been pretty pro uw lately. Shouldnt be worrying about scotts to try and twist this.
  • Miley_Cyrus
    Miley_Cyrus Member Posts: 842
    Maybe it’s as simple as people change over time. Seems like whatever the rift was has been resolved and hence the offer.