Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Season Ending Defensive Review - 2016 vs 2017
Comments
-
Why do you hate Rosen?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Or Herbert.Edwin_Bambino said:Good read. My only counter point would be we didn’t play Kalil Tate or Sam Darnold this year.
Fuck...did UW even face any good QBs? -
I'm not sure he was actually good this season:Tequilla said:
Why do you hate Rosen?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Or Herbert.Edwin_Bambino said:Good read. My only counter point would be we didn’t play Kalil Tate or Sam Darnold this year.
Fuck...did UW even face any good QBs?
http://www.cfbstats.com/2017/leader/national/player/split01/category02/sort02.html
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr -
Look at the names on the list Boobs ... you should be flagging yourself for posting this kind of shit
-
That's the point. Rosen was dreck too.Tequilla said:Look at the names on the list Boobs ... you should be flagging yourself for posting this kind of shit
-
The point being that QB Rating (particularly in college) is a largely meaningless stat.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's the point. Rosen was dreck too.Tequilla said:Look at the names on the list Boobs ... you should be flagging yourself for posting this kind of shit
-
TL;DR of the TL;DR
Everyone is talking about the difference between between Kawasaki 2016 and Kawasaki 2017 -
Excellent point here @Tequilla on the Stanford model for beating our D. But with a more competent offense able to sustain its own long drives, the D is certainly less exposed to these vulnerable types of scenarios. We probably win that game something like 30- 17 or 30 - 24 with any sort of decent offensive performance.Tequilla said:
I suspect that the Stanford film will be scrutinized by the staff a lot in the offseason as this is a blueprint for how to attack our defense by going from 1st and 10 to 2nd and 6 to 3rd and 3 and then either a conversion of 4th and 1 ... sustaining drives is not easy against us but doable. The Stanford game desperately needed some attacking pressure to create a substantially negative play (either a sack or holding penalty) or turnover. It's the one thing that this defense really didn't do particularly well this year.2001400ex said:Stats are for losers. Defense cost us the Stanford game.
-
Also, do you know how fucking miserable and pathetic your OC and QB have to be to not win a shitty conference with a D putting up numbers like that? I actually feel worse now that I know all this shit.
-
We need the TURNOVER SALMON now more than ever it appears.
