Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Price or Tui 2: Electric Boogaloo
TierbsHsotBoobs
Member Posts: 39,680
Price or Tui 2: Electric Boogaloo 43 votes
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
86%
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
37 votes
Tui with Sark and the rest of the 2013 Huskies
13%
6 votes
Comments
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesPrice with a great offensive line, and an actual defense wins
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesFair rebuttal, Boobs. I can't argue with that.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesBy the way, I need to go take a shower now. I hate making it look like I'm taking Tui down...he's one of my five favorite Huskies ever.
It's not about talking him down. It's about how underappreciated Price is. 2014 is going to be "special" without him. -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesThat was actually a good exercise for those who bash Price.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesMost Doogs would take the Tui/Sark combo cause Doogs are stupid like that.
The big difference the 2000 team had on this team was the OL, DL and coaching. -
Field
Locker/DJ (sticks around) 94' Dawgs -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesDefinitely 2000, but I don't think that teams wins the Rose Bowl.
-
Tui with Sark and the rest of the 2013 HuskiesSo Price would have been able to duplicate Tui's 5 fourth quarter comebacks?
-
Tui with Sark and the rest of the 2013 HuskiesTui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
Would Price have sucked the first three quarters where you needed comebacks against bad Cal, Stanford, Arizona, and ASU teams?LevelPar said:So Price would have been able to duplicate Tui's 5 fourth quarter comebacks?
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
Rick had one of the better coaching performances in 2000 in UW history. To say otherwise is ignoring the facts.LevelPar said:Tui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
-
Tui with Sark and the rest of the 2013 Huskies
I would rather ignore that fact than not ignore your constant nibbling on "Ricks" foreskin.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Rick had one of the better coaching performances in 2000 in UW history. To say otherwise is ignoring the facts.LevelPar said:Tui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
Rick had one of the better coaching seasons in UW history that year. Looking at the talent on the roster vs what they did, how he handled the Curtis Williams tragedy, how that was kind of a young team(the we are young was actually created that year by Ted Miller), was the only coach to defeat Miami in a span of like 35 games.LevelPar said:
I would rather ignore that fact than not ignore your constant nibbling on "Ricks" foreskin.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Rick had one of the better coaching performances in 2000 in UW history. To say otherwise is ignoring the facts.LevelPar said:Tui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
You hate Rick and love Sark.LevelPar said:
I would rather ignore that fact than not ignore your constant nibbling on "Ricks" foreskin.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Rick had one of the better coaching performances in 2000 in UW history. To say otherwise is ignoring the facts.LevelPar said:Tui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
Are you the retard love child of Section14aFS? -
Tui with Sark and the rest of the 2013 Huskies
Don't love Sark and don't hate Rick. In fact, I actually like Rick. My argument is Tui > PriceTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You hate Rick and love Sark.LevelPar said:
I would rather ignore that fact than not ignore your constant nibbling on "Ricks" foreskin.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Rick had one of the better coaching performances in 2000 in UW history. To say otherwise is ignoring the facts.LevelPar said:Tui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
Are you the retard love child of Section14aFS? -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
You should make that argument then.LevelPar said:
Don't love Sark and don't hate Rick. In fact, I actually like Rick. My argument is Tui > PriceTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You hate Rick and love Sark.LevelPar said:
I would rather ignore that fact than not ignore your constant nibbling on "Ricks" foreskin.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Rick had one of the better coaching performances in 2000 in UW history. To say otherwise is ignoring the facts.LevelPar said:Tui is a warrior and could overcome bad coaching.
Are you the retard love child of Section14aFS?
-
Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options. -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit. -
What is this - fucking fantasy Husky Football? Fuck off
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 HuskiesBest pole ever to confuse and out Doogs who want to masquerade as 1%ers.
-
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit. -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
I need to do this more often.Swaye said:Best pole ever to confuse and out Doogs who want to masquerade as 1%ers.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
The Stanford team was shit and they shouldn't have been in that spot to begin with.Southerndawg said:
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit.
Also Oregon State when we defeated was a much different team than they ended up being. That wasn't some miracle comeback. In fact Paul Arnold won that game. We pounded the ball on them the whole game.
Tui had a bad turnover on a 2 point conversation that led to Oregon State getting 2 points in fact. Tripplett had a huge tackle forcing them to kick a long FG.
Had UW played Oregon State in November even with Tui I bet they beat us. I agree Tui had the intangibles but he also sucked for most of the game against bad to average teams why those comebacks were needed. -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
You're missing a big part of the picture here, no way you run the option with Price, and without the option RN's running game sucked.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The Stanford team was shit and they shouldn't have been in that spot to begin with.Southerndawg said:
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit.
Also Oregon State when we defeated was a much different team than they ended up being. That wasn't some miracle comeback. In fact Paul Arnold won that game. We pounded the ball on them the whole game.
Tui had a bad turnover on a 2 point conversation that led to Oregon State getting 2 points in fact. Tripplett had a huge tackle forcing them to kick a long FG.
Had UW played Oregon State in November even with Tui I bet they beat us. I agree Tui had the intangibles but he also sucked for most of the game against bad to average teams why those comebacks were needed.
Sorry, that team was not special anywhere except the running game and QB. Swap Price for Tui and the running game is gone.
NO WAY 2000 UW goes to the Rose Bowl with Keith Price at QB. Zero chance. That's a 9 win team at best.
And that's assuming Miami didn't snap him in two the second game of the year. -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
You guys are all forgetting that UW that year was picked to win the conference.dnc said:
You're missing a big part of the picture here, no way you run the option with Price, and without the option RN's running game sucked.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The Stanford team was shit and they shouldn't have been in that spot to begin with.Southerndawg said:
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit.
Also Oregon State when we defeated was a much different team than they ended up being. That wasn't some miracle comeback. In fact Paul Arnold won that game. We pounded the ball on them the whole game.
Tui had a bad turnover on a 2 point conversation that led to Oregon State getting 2 points in fact. Tripplett had a huge tackle forcing them to kick a long FG.
Had UW played Oregon State in November even with Tui I bet they beat us. I agree Tui had the intangibles but he also sucked for most of the game against bad to average teams why those comebacks were needed.
Sorry, that team was not special anywhere except the running game and QB. Swap Price for Tui and the running game is gone.
NO WAY 2000 UW goes to the Rose Bowl with Keith Price at QB. Zero chance. That's a 9 win team at best.
And that's assuming Miami didn't snap him in two the second game of the year.
Now your option point is a great point. I can't or won't even try to refute that. It's the first good point someone has brought up on this subject instead of the old cliche "Tui willed them in comebacks". -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
Tui was a very big reason why they were picked to win the conference as he was predicted to be conference player of the year (which he was.)He_Needs_More_Time said:
You guys are all forgetting that UW that year was picked to win the conference.dnc said:
You're missing a big part of the picture here, no way you run the option with Price, and without the option RN's running game sucked.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The Stanford team was shit and they shouldn't have been in that spot to begin with.Southerndawg said:
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit.
Also Oregon State when we defeated was a much different team than they ended up being. That wasn't some miracle comeback. In fact Paul Arnold won that game. We pounded the ball on them the whole game.
Tui had a bad turnover on a 2 point conversation that led to Oregon State getting 2 points in fact. Tripplett had a huge tackle forcing them to kick a long FG.
Had UW played Oregon State in November even with Tui I bet they beat us. I agree Tui had the intangibles but he also sucked for most of the game against bad to average teams why those comebacks were needed.
Sorry, that team was not special anywhere except the running game and QB. Swap Price for Tui and the running game is gone.
NO WAY 2000 UW goes to the Rose Bowl with Keith Price at QB. Zero chance. That's a 9 win team at best.
And that's assuming Miami didn't snap him in two the second game of the year.
Now your option point is a great point. I can't or won't even try to refute that. It's the first good point someone has brought up on this subject instead of the old cliche "Tui willed them in comebacks".
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
Exactly.RoadDawg55 said:
Tui was a very big reason why they were picked to win the conference as he was predicted to be conference player of the year (which he was.)He_Needs_More_Time said:
You guys are all forgetting that UW that year was picked to win the conference.dnc said:
You're missing a big part of the picture here, no way you run the option with Price, and without the option RN's running game sucked.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The Stanford team was shit and they shouldn't have been in that spot to begin with.Southerndawg said:
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit.
Also Oregon State when we defeated was a much different team than they ended up being. That wasn't some miracle comeback. In fact Paul Arnold won that game. We pounded the ball on them the whole game.
Tui had a bad turnover on a 2 point conversation that led to Oregon State getting 2 points in fact. Tripplett had a huge tackle forcing them to kick a long FG.
Had UW played Oregon State in November even with Tui I bet they beat us. I agree Tui had the intangibles but he also sucked for most of the game against bad to average teams why those comebacks were needed.
Sorry, that team was not special anywhere except the running game and QB. Swap Price for Tui and the running game is gone.
NO WAY 2000 UW goes to the Rose Bowl with Keith Price at QB. Zero chance. That's a 9 win team at best.
And that's assuming Miami didn't snap him in two the second game of the year.
Now your option point is a great point. I can't or won't even try to refute that. It's the first good point someone has brought up on this subject instead of the old cliche "Tui willed them in comebacks".
Without Tui running the option so well in 99, that team's not picked to win the conference. -
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
What difference does that make? I watched that team all year (and I wasn't 12 either). They weren't very good. Pretty much average across the board except the OL were very good run blockers and good pass blockers and Tui was TUFF as nails and ran the option perfectly. Alexis' big run against Miami was off an option pitch, as were many of the other huge run plays that didn't show up in Tui's stats.He_Needs_More_Time said:
You guys are all forgetting that UW that year was picked to win the conference.dnc said:
You're missing a big part of the picture here, no way you run the option with Price, and without the option RN's running game sucked.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The Stanford team was shit and they shouldn't have been in that spot to begin with.Southerndawg said:
Not sure they beat Oregon State or Stanford with that swap, and I'm also not convinced the team would have had the same focus. The difference in intangibles between Price and Tui is immense. Griity lead by example performances defined Tui. The team responded to him. That is not what or who Keith Price is. Sorry, I get poking a finger in doogs eyes, but the anti doog rhetoric on this is missing the bigger point.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Team still goes to a Rose Bowl if you swapped Tui for Price. That team only upset one team which was Miami.Southerndawg said:Bad options. Price doesn't elevate the 2000 team to a win over Miami, nor do they make it to a Rose Bowl. Tui elevates this year's team to 9 or 10 wins, but there aren't enough bad mother fuckers on this team to win the league, and those 9 or 10 wins not only save Sark's ass, but get him another contract extension.
Option A sacrifices a Rose Bowl, option B sacrifices Tui AND saves Sark. Fuck both options.
Remember that year the Pac-10 was very top heavy. You had Washington, Oregon State and Oregon who were all in the top 10. They all took turns beating each other at home. Meanwhile the rest of the conference was a total dreckfest. Why those three teams that I mentioned went a combined 18-0 against the rest of the league while only going 1-1 against each other.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
Look for yourselves. The conference besides those three were all fucking dogshit. All those "great" comeback wins were because Tui couldn't get off to a good start. It's why after every comeback win in the post game presser Gilby was always pissed off.
In fact after the comeback win over Cal he sarcastically said "For just once I'd like to see this 4th quarter offense happen in the first three quarters. That would be a nice change for once".
I would take Tui over Price but this notion that if you replace Tui with a good QB that team crumbles is bullshit.
Also Oregon State when we defeated was a much different team than they ended up being. That wasn't some miracle comeback. In fact Paul Arnold won that game. We pounded the ball on them the whole game.
Tui had a bad turnover on a 2 point conversation that led to Oregon State getting 2 points in fact. Tripplett had a huge tackle forcing them to kick a long FG.
Had UW played Oregon State in November even with Tui I bet they beat us. I agree Tui had the intangibles but he also sucked for most of the game against bad to average teams why those comebacks were needed.
Sorry, that team was not special anywhere except the running game and QB. Swap Price for Tui and the running game is gone.
NO WAY 2000 UW goes to the Rose Bowl with Keith Price at QB. Zero chance. That's a 9 win team at best.
And that's assuming Miami didn't snap him in two the second game of the year.
Now your option point is a great point. I can't or won't even try to refute that. It's the first good point someone has brought up on this subject instead of the old cliche "Tui willed them in comebacks".
Yes, Tripplett was very good as was Stevens, but the WR's were dreckfest, the RB's weren't special, the rest of the DL was average, the LB's were mediocre and the DB's were populated by true freshman. There wasn't much special about that team. Probably the worst 11-1 team the conference ever produced.
-
Tui with Sark and the rest of the 2013 Huskies
Hypothetical polls are irrelevant.....unless you barely have a high school diploma and think the Affordable Health Care Act is going to save the world.Swaye said:Best pole ever to confuse and out Doogs who want to masquerade as 1%ers.
-
Price with Rick and the rest of the 2000 Huskies
LevelPar doesn't deal in hypotheticalsLevelPar said:
Hypothetical polls are irrelevant.....unless you barely have a high school diploma and think the Affordable Health Care Act is going to save the world.Swaye said:Best pole ever to confuse and out Doogs who want to masquerade as 1%ers.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
