Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Myles Murao, 2020 OL, Santa Ana (Mater Dei), CA (COMMITTED 😳)

1293032343544

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential. Obviously he didn't gain bad weight because he's lazy and he's gonna lose the bad weight in college if not before he arrives on campus. Stupid reason to drop him. His NFL potential has not changed at all. But that's Biggins for ya. I'm sure he's pissed he's not going to USC.

    dnc said:

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential.

    Wrong.gif
    What are you talking about? The 247 rankings are based on projecting NFL potential. How do you not know this? 5-star for projected 1st round picks. 4-star for projected NFL draft pick. 3-star for projected UDFA.
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential.

    Wrong.gif
    What are you talking about? The 247 rankings are based on projecting NFL potential. How do you not know this? 5-star for projected 1st round picks. 4-star for projected NFL draft pick. 3-star for projected UDFA.
    Bull. Shit.

    Feel free to produce a link backing that claim up. You won’t. You can’t. It’s about college projection not NFL.

    Also there’s this.










    HTH





    Not usually one to back @StrongArmCobra over @dnc but.......

    https://247sports.com/podcast/the-247sports-recruiting-podcast-12/




    Podcast 6 days ago spends a good 25 minutes on why they do their rankings based on NFL projections. 32 5 stars to mirror the 1st round. Moved Bryce Young to a 5 star because he’s similar to Mayfield and Murray and they went 1st.

    Lots of discussion how they look at body types and projections, and they analyze 1st rounders and what they looked like in high school. Such as how most TE are not developed in high school and the high drafted ones have huge gains in college.
    I knew Ballz was right because of Zach Banner. Someone asked Biggins how he was the 11th best OT in his recruiting class because he sucked and Biggins said the rankings are based on NFL potential.

    It has to get murky at times though. There are dual threat QB’s that don’t have the arm to be a high pick in the NFL draft, but should still be highly rated.
    They sure nailed that one
    He was a 5th round draft pick. He played well as a senior. It wasn’t as bad as it seems.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential. Obviously he didn't gain bad weight because he's lazy and he's gonna lose the bad weight in college if not before he arrives on campus. Stupid reason to drop him. His NFL potential has not changed at all. But that's Biggins for ya. I'm sure he's pissed he's not going to USC.

    dnc said:

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential.

    Wrong.gif
    What are you talking about? The 247 rankings are based on projecting NFL potential. How do you not know this? 5-star for projected 1st round picks. 4-star for projected NFL draft pick. 3-star for projected UDFA.
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential.

    Wrong.gif
    What are you talking about? The 247 rankings are based on projecting NFL potential. How do you not know this? 5-star for projected 1st round picks. 4-star for projected NFL draft pick. 3-star for projected UDFA.
    Bull. Shit.

    Feel free to produce a link backing that claim up. You won’t. You can’t. It’s about college projection not NFL.

    Also there’s this.










    HTH





    Not usually one to back @StrongArmCobra over @dnc but.......

    https://247sports.com/podcast/the-247sports-recruiting-podcast-12/




    Podcast 6 days ago spends a good 25 minutes on why they do their rankings based on NFL projections. 32 5 stars to mirror the 1st round. Moved Bryce Young to a 5 star because he’s similar to Mayfield and Murray and they went 1st.

    Lots of discussion how they look at body types and projections, and they analyze 1st rounders and what they looked like in high school. Such as how most TE are not developed in high school and the high drafted ones have huge gains in college.
    I knew Ballz was right because of Zach Banner. Someone asked Biggins how he was the 11th best OT in his recruiting class because he sucked and Biggins said the rankings are based on NFL potential.

    It has to get murky at times though. There are dual threat QB’s that don’t have the arm to be a high pick in the NFL draft, but should still be highly rated.
    They sure nailed that one
    247 is FS if they grade their recruiting rankings with the results of the NFL draft.

    If that's the case, they should factor in the 3-5 years of development these kids get at each school once they commit. Cam Williams with 3-4 years of Socha and Lake? He should've been elevated to a 5* when he committed.

    You can bump this when he's taken in the first round.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,672

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential. Obviously he didn't gain bad weight because he's lazy and he's gonna lose the bad weight in college if not before he arrives on campus. Stupid reason to drop him. His NFL potential has not changed at all. But that's Biggins for ya. I'm sure he's pissed he's not going to USC.

    dnc said:

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential.

    Wrong.gif
    What are you talking about? The 247 rankings are based on projecting NFL potential. How do you not know this? 5-star for projected 1st round picks. 4-star for projected NFL draft pick. 3-star for projected UDFA.
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    The rankings are supposed to be a projection of NFL potential.

    Wrong.gif
    What are you talking about? The 247 rankings are based on projecting NFL potential. How do you not know this? 5-star for projected 1st round picks. 4-star for projected NFL draft pick. 3-star for projected UDFA.
    Bull. Shit.

    Feel free to produce a link backing that claim up. You won’t. You can’t. It’s about college projection not NFL.

    Also there’s this.










    HTH





    Not usually one to back @StrongArmCobra over @dnc but.......

    https://247sports.com/podcast/the-247sports-recruiting-podcast-12/




    Podcast 6 days ago spends a good 25 minutes on why they do their rankings based on NFL projections. 32 5 stars to mirror the 1st round. Moved Bryce Young to a 5 star because he’s similar to Mayfield and Murray and they went 1st.

    Lots of discussion how they look at body types and projections, and they analyze 1st rounders and what they looked like in high school. Such as how most TE are not developed in high school and the high drafted ones have huge gains in college.
    I knew Ballz was right because of Zach Banner. Someone asked Biggins how he was the 11th best OT in his recruiting class because he sucked and Biggins said the rankings are based on NFL potential.

    It has to get murky at times though. There are dual threat QB’s that don’t have the arm to be a high pick in the NFL draft, but should still be highly rated.
    They sure nailed that one
    He was a 5th round draft pick. He played well as a senior. It wasn’t as bad as it seems.

    Also won a Rose Bowl and popped off. FML
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Ntd,bb

    I was looking at Center at first.
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/usatodayhss.com/2019/what-we-learned-no-3-mater-dei-42-centennial-12/amp

    More Myles Murao love. Hope Korey thinks "man, I'm going to Washington to be developed and compete with and against this guy"

    Doogin.gif
  • BeerThirty
    BeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    GIDDY! Myles is so good!