Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Gaskin is a 2nd team Preseason All-American. Only gets 7 rushing attempts.

13»

Comments

  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    After seeing our performance against the worst team in the Big11, and then seeing other teams play this weekend, we will be lucky to win 6 games this year. I don't think it matters how many times Gaskin touches the ball. We suck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098
    uzi said:

    After seeing our performance against the worst team in the Big11, and then seeing other teams play this weekend, we will be lucky to win 6 games this year. I don't think it matters how many times Gaskin touches the ball. We suck.

    You underestimate how much the Pac 10 sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Didn't Gaskin also get underutilized in the 2016 opener? His turn will come.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    haie said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    whuggy said:

    Gaskin is really good. Even he needs holes though.
    Weren't a ton of those to be had Friday.

    He found them. 7 carries 59 yards, with a long of 17. Gaskin is a stud. Coleman is too. Gaskin is the better player, but at times last year, Coleman had the hot hand and I would yell at the TV for him to get in the game.
    I've gotten to the point when you can actually tell which RB is best for the game. If we are facing a strong front (think Stanford or teams like that), gaskin is who is best for that because of his burst and his incredible vision and lateral ability, when we face those soft Pac-12 teams (WSU, AZ, etc) Coleman can see the holes our line opens up and he is just a force in those games.

    I love them both though, so abundance.
    Gaskin should get almost all of the carries the first 3-3.5 quarters. Coleman in the 4th after the defense is exhausted from stretching Gaskin out along he sideline. It's so goddamn simple and we mostly stuck to it last season.
    Solid Doogman analysis
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorwegianHusky
    NorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,425
    Babushka reads this bored.

    GASKIN IS NOT A BIG BACK
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,429 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    haie said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    whuggy said:

    Gaskin is really good. Even he needs holes though.
    Weren't a ton of those to be had Friday.

    He found them. 7 carries 59 yards, with a long of 17. Gaskin is a stud. Coleman is too. Gaskin is the better player, but at times last year, Coleman had the hot hand and I would yell at the TV for him to get in the game.
    I've gotten to the point when you can actually tell which RB is best for the game. If we are facing a strong front (think Stanford or teams like that), gaskin is who is best for that because of his burst and his incredible vision and lateral ability, when we face those soft Pac-12 teams (WSU, AZ, etc) Coleman can see the holes our line opens up and he is just a force in those games.

    I love them both though, so abundance.
    Gaskin should get almost all of the carries the first 3-3.5 quarters. Coleman in the 4th after the defense is exhausted from stretching Gaskin out along he sideline. It's so goddamn simple and we mostly stuck to it last season.
    Solid Doogman analysis
    This is pretty much what we did every game last year, so I guess Doogman had it right.

    Here's another great tried and true doogism: "FUCK OFF"

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Babushka
    Babushka Member Posts: 211
    NorwegianHusky said:

    Babushka reads this bored.

    GASKIN IS NOT A BIG BACK

    Welcome to November, 2016
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter