Huskies, Trojans teams to beat again in Pac-12 — just like old times
Comments
-
6. California (No. 87, 5-7): Well, now what? The Golden Bears pushed their chips in on chucking the ball around and not worrying much about defense under Sonny Dykes, and it got them a 19-30 record over four years with one bowl bid and one No. 1 overall pick in the NFL draft (Jared Goff). Justin Wilcox takes over as a first-time head coach seeking new starters at quarterback and running back, and with a defense that was the second-worst in FBS at defending the run last year. There’s lots to figure out, and coming anywhere close to reaching six victories would make this a solid debut season.
Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/article169275367.html#storylink=cpy
LOL their only accomplishment is having a dude go #1 in the draft, but he lost a fuckton of games. If that were a UW player we would rip him to high heaven. I still don't understand why Goff went #1. Decent QB going against mostly Pac12 dreck = profit?! -
Stanford has zero playoff appearances.Gladstone said:
Is this post from 2010? Or is it 2011? 2012? Maybe 2013? Hey they did have a down year in 2014, winning only 8 games. So maybe your post is from 2015? No? 2016?haie said:
And watching ESPN right now, LOL at all the Stanford love. They are not the same team without their qb from the Rose Bowl teams. They have oline/dline talent, but a massive step down in skill players, and there are no expectations/pressure for Shaw to keep it going. They're fucked. -
"They're fucked" != missing the playoffsTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford has zero playoff appearances.Gladstone said:
Is this post from 2010? Or is it 2011? 2012? Maybe 2013? Hey they did have a down year in 2014, winning only 8 games. So maybe your post is from 2015? No? 2016?haie said:
And watching ESPN right now, LOL at all the Stanford love. They are not the same team without their qb from the Rose Bowl teams. They have oline/dline talent, but a massive step down in skill players, and there are no expectations/pressure for Shaw to keep it going. They're fucked.
not sure what point you're arguing against
maybe vomit post in another thread -
It worked for Jack LocknerGladstone said:6. California (No. 87, 5-7): Well, now what? The Golden Bears pushed their chips in on chucking the ball around and not worrying much about defense under Sonny Dykes, and it got them a 19-30 record over four years with one bowl bid and one No. 1 overall pick in the NFL draft (Jared Goff). Justin Wilcox takes over as a first-time head coach seeking new starters at quarterback and running back, and with a defense that was the second-worst in FBS at defending the run last year. There’s lots to figure out, and coming anywhere close to reaching six victories would make this a solid debut season.
Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/article169275367.html#storylink=cpy
LOL their only accomplishment is having a dude go #1 in the draft, but he lost a fuckton of games. If that were a UW player we would rip him to high heaven. I still don't understand why Goff went #1. Decent QB going against mostly Pac12 dreck = profit?! -
Um their new quarterback(s) suck balls McFaggit is gone to NFL and they have no other good skill players. Shaw is overrated. They suck now.Gladstone said:
Is this post from 2010? Or is it 2011? 2012? Maybe 2013? Hey they did have a down year in 2014, winning only 8 games. So maybe your post is from 2015? No? 2016?haie said:
And watching ESPN right now, LOL at all the Stanford love. They are not the same team without their qb from the Rose Bowl teams. They have oline/dline talent, but a massive step down in skill players, and there are no expectations/pressure for Shaw to keep it going. They're fucked. -
Nothing like you guys sweet circle jerk of being 2nd best in the pac next to your idol USC.
Of course anyone under the age of 35 laughs at this delusional horseshit. -
It *should* be SC and UW at the end or else their coaching staffs massively failed this year. Even ESPNFS knows this except for the morons picking Stanford.Pitchfork51 said:Nothing like you guys sweet circle jerk of being 2nd best in the pac next to your idol USC.
Of course anyone under the age of 35 laughs at this delusional horseshit. -
Scs will for sure. Yours probably will.haie said:
It *should* be SC and UW at the end or else their coaching staffs massively failed this year. Even ESPNFS knows this except for the morons picking Stanford.Pitchfork51 said:Nothing like you guys sweet circle jerk of being 2nd best in the pac next to your idol USC.
Of course anyone under the age of 35 laughs at this delusional horseshit. -
you beat me to itTierbsHsotBoobs said:
It worked for Jack LocknerGladstone said:6. California (No. 87, 5-7): Well, now what? The Golden Bears pushed their chips in on chucking the ball around and not worrying much about defense under Sonny Dykes, and it got them a 19-30 record over four years with one bowl bid and one No. 1 overall pick in the NFL draft (Jared Goff). Justin Wilcox takes over as a first-time head coach seeking new starters at quarterback and running back, and with a defense that was the second-worst in FBS at defending the run last year. There’s lots to figure out, and coming anywhere close to reaching six victories would make this a solid debut season.
Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/article169275367.html#storylink=cpy
LOL their only accomplishment is having a dude go #1 in the draft, but he lost a fuckton of games. If that were a UW player we would rip him to high heaven. I still don't understand why Goff went #1. Decent QB going against mostly Pac12 dreck = profit?! -
ITT: doogs afraid of Shaw and the mammoth Stanford home field advantage.
