Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We talking about practice? Yes

191012141530

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    @RaceBannon that doesn't mean that I buy it
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223

    Tequilla said:

    @RaceBannon that doesn't mean that I buy it

    It's coach speak but it is coach speak that mirrors Petermen. The article is correct in that it is a different attitude that the Kiffin Sark era immediately after Carroll

    Not unlike post Sark here
    Helton is no Pete

    You think Pete would even address whether OJ was allowed at practice?
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223

    Tequilla said:

    Swaye said:

    Two ways to look at this.

    (1) Young guys are bad asses like we'd hoped, and the D will be fierce.

    (2) Brownsocks and his band of merry faggots still suck and this year will be last year, where USC buttfucks us. Again.
    Numbah Wahn.

    Defense is always ahead of offense early in season.
    Not to mention that the defense did this last year as well ... spoke more to the quality of the D than the ineptitude of the O
    It did foreshadow the offense sucking against a good physical defense. But all in all I prefer the defense to be ahead of the offense
    No question the offense isn't dropping 40 in those games ...

    But our defense is definitely good enough to win games 17-13 ... 20-17 ... etc
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,476 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    @RaceBannon that doesn't mean that I buy it

    It's coach speak but it is coach speak that mirrors Petermen. The article is correct in that it is a different attitude that the Kiffin Sark era immediately after Carroll

    Not unlike post Sark here
    Helton is no Pete

    You think Pete would even address whether OJ was allowed at practice?
    This response is as baffling as an IM zone.

    Helton was asked. If OJ was an UW alum and Heisman winner Petermen would have had to say he's not welcome on campus same as Clay

    Helton is 1-0 so far against Petermen
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,476 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Swaye said:

    Two ways to look at this.

    (1) Young guys are bad asses like we'd hoped, and the D will be fierce.

    (2) Brownsocks and his band of merry faggots still suck and this year will be last year, where USC buttfucks us. Again.
    Numbah Wahn.

    Defense is always ahead of offense early in season.
    Not to mention that the defense did this last year as well ... spoke more to the quality of the D than the ineptitude of the O
    It did foreshadow the offense sucking against a good physical defense. But all in all I prefer the defense to be ahead of the offense
    No question the offense isn't dropping 40 in those games ...

    But our defense is definitely good enough to win games 17-13 ... 20-17 ... etc
    It is. Petermen and Smith need to play a little more not to lose on offense in that type of game. Pick 6s and safeties suck hard when its tight
  • AlCzervik
    AlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    @RaceBannon that doesn't mean that I buy it

    It's coach speak but it is coach speak that mirrors Petermen. The article is correct in that it is a different attitude that the Kiffin Sark era immediately after Carroll

    Not unlike post Sark here

    You think Pete would even address whether OJ was allowed at practice?
    Yes.

    foxsports.com/college-football/story/oj-simpson-made-in-america-usc-trojans-2002-orange-bowl-practice-061416