The Pac-12 needs to take a page out of the ACC's playbook
Comments
-
What do these guys have in common?
-
Quooks gonna quook
-
I could have put ASU or UCLA, probably. I'm just more familiar with Oregon.RaceBannon said:Quooks gonna quook
-
I put UCLA 2nd. UO ad ASU aren't in the convo
-
Generally agree.RaceBannon said:I put UCLA 2nd. UO ad ASU aren't in the convo
Cal could probably get a lifetime achievement award, but opinions vary about whether they actually played football before 1994 -
The only page the PAC 12 should take from the ACC is to encourage more white trash slut/whores on camera.
-
Bama won titles in every decade except the 80's but stillcreepycoug said:
To be fair, or something, the same could have been said about Alabama before Nick got there, and yet, they were still on Mount Rushmore, with little debate. A lot of schools have titles that are fuzzy, or questionable. That's the nature of ancient history, and that's why I love me someYellowSnow said:
Anything stand out to you with these numbers?AZDuck said:
Um, no.RaceBannon said:
You can be #2 without coming close. Its like being 3 in the B1G or 2 in the SEC. UF, UT, Auburn and the like all think they are on Bama's heels but they aren't.creepycoug said:"No Pac-12 program comes close to matching the Trojans in terms of tradition."
Ouch! 'comes close'? Not even 'comes close'? I thought you? were the favored #2. That must've hurt. Combined with the thinly-veiled academis dig about Warshington, this Rittenberg needs to be taken out to the woodshed.
How did this dumb fuck ever get into Northwestern?
The Mount Rushmore of college ball is ND, Bama, Ohio State, and USC
Nobody is close including Michigan which is UW with better PR
In terms of history, UW is closer to UO than UM:
1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1918, 1923, 1932, 1933, 1947, 1948, 1997
CANES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We? don't go back to territorial states scheduling for our? titles baby. From an historical standpoint, they all happened last week. -
Ummmmmmmm............hello???PurpleThrobber said:The only page the PAC 12 should take from the ACC is to encourage more white trash slut/whores on camera.
-
I take it back. But still,RaceBannon said:
Bama won titles in every decade except the 80's but stillcreepycoug said:
To be fair, or something, the same could have been said about Alabama before Nick got there, and yet, they were still on Mount Rushmore, with little debate. A lot of schools have titles that are fuzzy, or questionable. That's the nature of ancient history, and that's why I love me someYellowSnow said:
Anything stand out to you with these numbers?AZDuck said:
Um, no.RaceBannon said:
You can be #2 without coming close. Its like being 3 in the B1G or 2 in the SEC. UF, UT, Auburn and the like all think they are on Bama's heels but they aren't.creepycoug said:"No Pac-12 program comes close to matching the Trojans in terms of tradition."
Ouch! 'comes close'? Not even 'comes close'? I thought you? were the favored #2. That must've hurt. Combined with the thinly-veiled academis dig about Warshington, this Rittenberg needs to be taken out to the woodshed.
How did this dumb fuck ever get into Northwestern?
The Mount Rushmore of college ball is ND, Bama, Ohio State, and USC
Nobody is close including Michigan which is UW with better PR
In terms of history, UW is closer to UO than UM:
1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1918, 1923, 1932, 1933, 1947, 1948, 1997
CANES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We? don't go back to territorial states scheduling for our? titles baby. From an historical standpoint, they all happened last week.
You did forget Oklahoma. -
If ND gets bumped Oklahoma is tanned rested and readycreepycoug said:
I take it back. But still,RaceBannon said:
Bama won titles in every decade except the 80's but stillcreepycoug said:
To be fair, or something, the same could have been said about Alabama before Nick got there, and yet, they were still on Mount Rushmore, with little debate. A lot of schools have titles that are fuzzy, or questionable. That's the nature of ancient history, and that's why I love me someYellowSnow said:
Anything stand out to you with these numbers?AZDuck said:
Um, no.RaceBannon said:
You can be #2 without coming close. Its like being 3 in the B1G or 2 in the SEC. UF, UT, Auburn and the like all think they are on Bama's heels but they aren't.creepycoug said:"No Pac-12 program comes close to matching the Trojans in terms of tradition."
Ouch! 'comes close'? Not even 'comes close'? I thought you? were the favored #2. That must've hurt. Combined with the thinly-veiled academis dig about Warshington, this Rittenberg needs to be taken out to the woodshed.
How did this dumb fuck ever get into Northwestern?
The Mount Rushmore of college ball is ND, Bama, Ohio State, and USC
Nobody is close including Michigan which is UW with better PR
In terms of history, UW is closer to UO than UM:
1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1918, 1923, 1932, 1933, 1947, 1948, 1997
CANES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We? don't go back to territorial states scheduling for our? titles baby. From an historical standpoint, they all happened last week.
You did forget Oklahoma.
