Fuck, Just Heard Mora with Huard
Comments
-
I'm pretty sure there was a millisecond of Coach Mora hesitating and changing the word to "kick"
-
Huh? This is about whether or not Mora is the right guy to replace Sark. I want a coach that can beat Furd and Oregon, why take a chance on another guy that needs 3 years?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Where were you demanding that Sark be fired in 2010?Your_Mom said:If Mora can't beat Oregon and Furd with the recruits he gets at Ucla...
Or do we need to let it play out when he gets all his own guys?
New coaches get three years, don't they?
-
I don't question that Mora would be a step up.whuggy said:Don James didn't always win championships.
He had some lean years. But you always felt
he was getting the most out of what he had
and if he had a bad year he was going to work
his ASS off to fix it. Mora gives me the same
feeling. With Sark, I feel like when he fucks up
his solution is to just turn the music up louder
at practice. Guess I'm kind of old school Husky
but just want to get back to days that even if you
lost, at least you hurt a few of theirs, legally of
course. Come home Jim.
But given that he can't beat Furd or Oregon, and got plunge red by Cal and Baylor, I have to think we should be aiming even higher. -
Um, he hasn't played Oregon yet. HTH.Your_Mom said:
I don't question that Mora would be a step up.whuggy said:Don James didn't always win championships.
He had some lean years. But you always felt
he was getting the most out of what he had
and if he had a bad year he was going to work
his ASS off to fix it. Mora gives me the same
feeling. With Sark, I feel like when he fucks up
his solution is to just turn the music up louder
at practice. Guess I'm kind of old school Husky
but just want to get back to days that even if you
lost, at least you hurt a few of theirs, legally of
course. Come home Jim.
But given that he can't beat Furd or Oregon, and got plunge red by Cal and Baylor, I have to think we should be aiming even higher. -
Don't ever change, LOSER.Your_Mom said:
Huh? This is about whether or not Mora is the right guy to replace Sark. I want a coach that can beat Furd and Oregon, why take a chance on another guy that needs 3 years?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Where were you demanding that Sark be fired in 2010?Your_Mom said:If Mora can't beat Oregon and Furd with the recruits he gets at Ucla...
Or do we need to let it play out when he gets all his own guys?
New coaches get three years, don't they?
-
In a nutshell, this.whuggy said:Don James didn't always win championships.
He had some lean years. But you always felt
he was getting the most out of what he had
and if he had a bad year he was going to work
his ASS off to fix it. Mora gives me the same
feeling. With Sark, I feel like when he fucks up
his solution is to just turn the music up louder
at practice. Guess I'm kind of old school Husky
but just want to get back to days that even if you
lost, at least you hurt a few of theirs, legally of
course. Come home Jim.
Look, we aren't going be Alabama here, and win 3 NC's in 4 years. Whatever Coach we get is going to have rough times. DJ did FFS. But, wouldn't it be refreshing to think that if we were struggling through a 7-6 year, that would be the low point, and the head man (Mora) would get the ship turned back into the wind, because he had discipline, a plan, and total command of the ship. With Sark, I always feel like the shoals are a gnats ass hair away.... -
It is only an assumption Mora could not do at WA what he hasn't done yet at UCLA. I believe Mora would get the team to run through a wall, like it did for James. Mora at WA brings intangibles that few other coaches could bring. And if properly supported by UW, Mora would be a lifer.Your_Mom said:
I don't question that Mora would be a step up.whuggy said:Don James didn't always win championships.
He had some lean years. But you always felt
he was getting the most out of what he had
and if he had a bad year he was going to work
his ASS off to fix it. Mora gives me the same
feeling. With Sark, I feel like when he fucks up
his solution is to just turn the music up louder
at practice. Guess I'm kind of old school Husky
but just want to get back to days that even if you
lost, at least you hurt a few of theirs, legally of
course. Come home Jim.
But given that he can't beat Furd or Oregon, and got plunge red by Cal and Baylor, I have to think we should be aiming even higher.
-
Nice retort. So how many years do you wNt to give Mora? 3 at Ucla, then 3 at Uw to prove himself?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Don't ever change, LOSER.Your_Mom said:
Huh? This is about whether or not Mora is the right guy to replace Sark. I want a coach that can beat Furd and Oregon, why take a chance on another guy that needs 3 years?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Where were you demanding that Sark be fired in 2010?Your_Mom said:If Mora can't beat Oregon and Furd with the recruits he gets at Ucla...
Or do we need to let it play out when he gets all his own guys?
New coaches get three years, don't they?
-
Three years to win a conference championship? Yeah, that's about right.Your_Mom said:
Nice retort. So how many years do you wNt to give Mora? 3 at Ucla, then 3 at Uw to prove himself?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Don't ever change, LOSER.Your_Mom said:
Huh? This is about whether or not Mora is the right guy to replace Sark. I want a coach that can beat Furd and Oregon, why take a chance on another guy that needs 3 years?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Where were you demanding that Sark be fired in 2010?Your_Mom said:If Mora can't beat Oregon and Furd with the recruits he gets at Ucla...
Or do we need to let it play out when he gets all his own guys?
New coaches get three years, don't they?
If Mora doesn't win the Pac-12 next year at UCLA, WDWHA. -
So then you want to keep sark till then? I want Sark gone now and bring in a proven college winner
