Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Marlon just flipped
Comments
-
USC/Washington Scoreboard? Yeah thats what I thought euthanize yourself hahahahCuntWaffle said:
You fucking lost to Stanford and Utah you stupid illiterate cunt. UW won the Pac-12. Get over it. Better yet please light yourself on fire.Browningnosing said:
Are you dense ?Browne played against sanford.Utah was a fluke lol. You do have one thing correct Browning did shit his shorts when he saw that SC Defense. That safety at the end was classic lmao Try to keep up I know football is new to you guyshaie said:
It's Shitshorts vs Darnold. Everyone here knows that.Browningnosing said:
Compare both teams SOS from last year and get back to me. Theres a reason SC finished 3rd in the nation.And above Dubs. Darnold was also the best QB in the PAC too tho Archie Griffen award as a red shirt.dubs had no chance against SC I called that one.WeakarmCobra said:
DisagreePetersen3098 said:
Washington is a bad program, Overrated, USC is the best team in the universe. You win, okay, move on.Browningnosing said:
How do you post with all the balls on your chin in the wigwam? $10.95 you must be desperateBaseman said:
Respectfully disagree. Judging from his poasts he's a Kgizz sized fag.CuntWaffle said:
So what you are saying is you are a huge fag?Browningnosing said:
No thanks I'm not interested in what goes on in the wigwam.WeakarmCobra said:
You should PM doogie. I think you two will get along very well.Browningnosing said:
I cant possibly be a troll. I have no troll ratings. WTF is chintastic is that a Udubs thing taking it on the chin?Petersen3098 said:I think he's a troll, don't feed him.
That said, you guys lost to Utah and a Burns-led Stanford. Fucking embarrassing. You did not deserve shit over UW regarding the playoffs. -
I want to see how USC performs when expectations are a natty. It is easy to win when you been written off.
-
Does Udubs even know what Natty expectations are? Fluke season based on a weak schedule. Your window is closedWeakarmCobra said:I want to see how USC performs when expectations are a natty. It is easy to win when you been written off.
-
Guess what? Our schedule is a cakewalk compared to USC next year.Browningnosing said:
Does Udubs even know what Natty expectations are? Fluke season based on a weak schedule. Your window is closedWeakarmCobra said:I want to see how USC performs when expectations are a natty. It is easy to win when you been written off.
-
I never thought it would happen at SC so fast
That they'd find a coach who looks more downsy than Sark -
Of course it is it always will be.Teams don't want to schedule Washington and lower their out of conference strength of schedule. They want to play contenders like SC. Thats why Wisconsin turned the Huskies down.WeakarmCobra said:
Guess what? Our schedule is a cakewalk compared to USC next year.Browningnosing said:
Does Udubs even know what Natty expectations are? Fluke season based on a weak schedule. Your window is closedWeakarmCobra said:I want to see how USC performs when expectations are a natty. It is easy to win when you been written off.
-
LoneStarDawg said:
I never thought it would happen at SC so fast
That they'd find a coach who looks more downsy than Sark
Whats Heltons record vs Peterson lmao muzzled -
2-1-1. Had a couple of plays in that first quarter gone our way, we'd be having a whole different conversation.Browningnosing said:LoneStarDawg said:I never thought it would happen at SC so fast
That they'd find a coach who looks more downsy than Sark
Whats Heltons record vs Peterson lmao muzzled -
Jesus man, this is a recruiting forum. Talk about the 3 Star DL guys Pete has put in the NFL, versus the 5 star flameouts at USC
-
Kikaha, DL? LB? Anyway, help me out here...NeGgaPlEaSe said:Jesus man, this is a recruiting forum. Talk about the 3 Star DL guys Pete has put in the NFL, versus the 5 star flameouts at USC
