Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OFFICIAL Donald Trump Inauguration Game Day Thread

1910111315

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773

    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    True, except reducing tax rates generally increases tax revenues. Even Obama understood this. His rationale for raising taxes was based on SJW equity bullshit.


    "GIBSON: All right. You have, however, said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton,” which was 28 percent. It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling, if you went to 28 percent.

    But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.

    So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?

    OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness. "
    Yeah, but still. Reduce federal spending and cede power to the individual states.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    True, except reducing tax rates generally increases tax revenues. Even Obama understood this. His rationale for raising taxes was based on SJW equity bullshit.


    "GIBSON: All right. You have, however, said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton,” which was 28 percent. It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling, if you went to 28 percent.

    But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.

    So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?

    OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness. "
    Yeah, but still. Reduce federal spending and cede power to the individual states.
    Totally agree.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    True, except reducing tax rates generally increases tax revenues. Even Obama understood this. His rationale for raising taxes was based on SJW equity bullshit.


    "GIBSON: All right. You have, however, said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton,” which was 28 percent. It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling, if you went to 28 percent.

    But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.

    So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?

    OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness. "
    Yeah, but still. Reduce federal spending and cede power to the individual states.
    Totally agree.
    Of course, then you get the inverse at the state and local levels. Taxes in Seattle and King County are getting ridiculous, especially thanks to low interest rates and cheap borrowing that inflates the cost of housing.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    doogie said:

    Rachel Madcow absolutely losing it now.

    Maybe a live Trump jump?
    Flagged for not right sizing the image. Get your shit together.
    Flagged because you can't manage a left mouse click.
    I don't want to see your shit memes. I'm just looking out for the mouthbreathers around here that might want to see them.

    Do you know you are the only poster on HH that can't figure out how to post an image that people can see?

    Special, you are.
    Yeah and I do it to piss snowflakes off.
    You are so far out there, no one here gets pissed at what you post. We just shake our head in awe of the stupidity.

    HTH
    Ironic
    I guess I'm the stupid one who believes when you cut taxes it reduces government revenues and pollution is harmful to the environment
    Well, linking two unrelated problems with unrelated causes is considerably dumb. I'll give you that.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    True, except reducing tax rates generally increases tax revenues. Even Obama understood this. His rationale for raising taxes was based on SJW equity bullshit.


    "GIBSON: All right. You have, however, said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton,” which was 28 percent. It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling, if you went to 28 percent.

    But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.

    OBAMA: Right.

    GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.

    So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?

    OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness. "
    Yeah, but still. Reduce federal spending and cede power to the individual states.
    Totally agree.
    Of course, then you get the inverse at the state and local levels. Taxes in Seattle and King County are getting ridiculous, especially thanks to low interest rates and cheap borrowing that inflates the cost of housing.
    People voting that way at the local level get the government they want and deserve without damaging the more rational among us who choose not to live there.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    Yeah like building a wall along the Mexican border.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,583 Standard Supporter

    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    Yeah like building a wall along the Mexican border.
    We don't have to build a wall.

    Drones with machine guns and missiles would work just fine.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Sledog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Reducing government revenues is a great way to encourage reduction of government expenses.

    Yeah like building a wall along the Mexican border.
    We don't have to build a wall.

    Drones with machine guns and missiles would work just fine.
    Too much logic, too cost effective, plus it takes advantage of current technology. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb.

    China built a wall 5,000 years ago. Better idea. Like trump said, no Mexicans in China.

    Though, building a wall could create jobs but who wants jobs from the public sector? Fuck that! You know it would take 10 years to build with 5 guys standing around watching another guy dig dirt.

    OR get a 3-d printer to build the wall. If you really really want a wall.