Home› NFL Talk

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

If Green Bay plays Atlanta...

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,089 Founders Club
in NFL Talk
The over/under will probably be about 63
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,450 Founders Club
    Green Bay is going to be a tuff matchup for my Pats.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    DerekJohnson said:

    The over/under will probably be about 63

    The judges would have accepted 69 or 81.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,485
    Although completely wrong, I still like 5
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,015 Swaye's Wigwam
    lol Cowboys. I wish I cared about the NFL and was a fan of a rival team. Would be so much fun listening to their fans.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Dallas is who we thought they are!!! Them dallas tears taste so good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931
    I wouldn't be giving Dallas a ton of shit for today ... if they are smart enough to find a way to get out of under Romo's contract and invest it in their defense they are probably a favorite in the NFC next year.

    The simple truth is that they got Rogers'ed today
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    I wouldn't be giving Dallas a ton of shit for today ... if they are smart enough to find a way to get out of under Romo's contract and invest it in their defense they are probably a favorite in the NFC next year.

    The simple truth is that they got Rogers'ed today

    They also need a good head coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Tequilla said:

    I wouldn't be giving Dallas a ton of shit for today ... if they are smart enough to find a way to get out of under Romo's contract and invest it in their defense they are probably a favorite in the NFC next year.

    The simple truth is that they got Rogers'ed today

    @Tequilla there is no fucking excuse to get behind 18 points at home. You have too good of an OL to do that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931
    Green Bay got off to a fast start while Dallas was a bit sluggish coming out of their bye ... you could argue that Seattle did the same yesterday to Atlanta.

    I'm not a huge Jason Garrett fan ... but he's not going anywhere after this year for a while.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Tequilla said:

    Green Bay got off to a fast start while Dallas was a bit sluggish coming out of their bye ... you could argue that Seattle did the same yesterday to Atlanta.

    I'm not a huge Jason Garrett fan ... but he's not going anywhere after this year for a while.

    That GB secondary was fucking beat up. They could not cover 88 to save their lives. "Winner win" and GB are winner and Dallas is not there.

    I do agree, dallas is here to stay.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PineapplePiratePineapplePirate Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    Pats vs Falcons Super Bowl

    I don't see how Green Bay is going to stop Matty Ice with 4 DBs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,450 Founders Club
    I'll root for Atlanta the rest of the way if they bring back the dirty bird dance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931
    WeakarmCobra said:

    Tequilla said:

    Green Bay got off to a fast start while Dallas was a bit sluggish coming out of their bye ... you could argue that Seattle did the same yesterday to Atlanta.

    I'm not a huge Jason Garrett fan ... but he's not going anywhere after this year for a while.

    That GB secondary was fucking beat up. They could not cover 88 to save their lives. "Winner win" and GB are winner and Dallas is not there.

    I do agree, dallas is here to stay.
    Dallas is built to run the football ... to say that all that they should have done is throw the football kinda goes against what they do well ... don't you think?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    Tequilla said:

    Green Bay got off to a fast start while Dallas was a bit sluggish coming out of their bye ... you could argue that Seattle did the same yesterday to Atlanta.

    I'm not a huge Jason Garrett fan ... but he's not going anywhere after this year for a while.

    That GB secondary was fucking beat up. They could not cover 88 to save their lives. "Winner win" and GB are winner and Dallas is not there.

    I do agree, dallas is here to stay.
    Dallas is built to run the football ... to say that all that they should have done is throw the football kinda goes against what they do well ... don't you think?
    Dallas threw too much
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    Tequilla said:

    I wouldn't be giving Dallas a ton of shit for today ... if they are smart enough to find a way to get out of under Romo's contract and invest it in their defense they are probably a favorite in the NFC next year.

    The simple truth is that they got Rogers'ed today

    Christ.

    Run the fucking ball all day, and it's an easy home win with Zeke (iltchziwiltd) and that line.

    Short and simple game plans were never your strong suit, though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931
    CaptainPJ said:

    Tequilla said:

    I wouldn't be giving Dallas a ton of shit for today ... if they are smart enough to find a way to get out of under Romo's contract and invest it in their defense they are probably a favorite in the NFC next year.

    The simple truth is that they got Rogers'ed today

    Christ.

    Run the fucking ball all day, and it's an easy home win with Zeke (iltchziwiltd) and that line.

    Short and simple game plans were never your strong suit, though.
    Cowboys had less possessions end in either punts or turnovers ...

    Difference was GB finished more of their drives with TDs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    CaptainPJ said:

    Tequilla said:

    I wouldn't be giving Dallas a ton of shit for today ... if they are smart enough to find a way to get out of under Romo's contract and invest it in their defense they are probably a favorite in the NFC next year.

    The simple truth is that they got Rogers'ed today

    Christ.

    Run the fucking ball all day, and it's an easy home win with Zeke (iltchziwiltd) and that line.

    Short and simple game plans were never your strong suit, though.
    Cowboys had less possessions end in either punts or turnovers ...

    Difference was GB finished more of their drives with TDs
    Fewer
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    PineapplePirate said:

    Pats vs Falcons Super Bowl

    I don't see how Green Bay is going to stop Matty Ice with 4 DBs.

    Hi there!

    They won't stop Matty Ice just like they didn't stop Dak Prescott. The run of the table is built around scoring 35 or more pts per game. If they don't... they lose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    salemcoog said:

    PineapplePirate said:

    Pats vs Falcons Super Bowl

    I don't see how Green Bay is going to stop Matty Ice with 4 DBs.

    Hi there!

    They won't stop Matty Ice just like they didn't stop Dak Prescott. The run of the table is built around scoring 35 or more pts per game. If they don't... they lose.
    They didn't score 35 in their last game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rodmansragerodmansrage Member Posts: 6,299
    allpurpleallgold said:

    salemcoog said:

    PineapplePirate said:

    Pats vs Falcons Super Bowl

    I don't see how Green Bay is going to stop Matty Ice with 4 DBs.

    Hi there!

    They won't stop Matty Ice just like they didn't stop Dak Prescott. The run of the table is built around scoring 35 or more pts per game. If they don't... they lose.
    They didn't score 35 in their last game.
    big, if true.



    edit: its true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.