Seattle Times will be laying a bunch of people off
I guess the fact they have a shit product never crosses their minds during their work meetings.
Comments
-
-
Now that we have breitbart and dailymail.co.uk, what use is there for the Seattle times?
-
Bidness is booming at the Tacoma News Tribune!
-
same thing happening at KOMO4
-
They blaming us for free shit use of their shit website?
Not very liberal or compassionate of them. -
and now, the Amazon Post is crying, too.
Check out the comments section. Not a single defender of the Bezo's Bomb. Hilarious
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/its-time-to-retire-the-tainted-term-fake-news/2017/01/06/a5a7516c-d375-11e6-945a-76f69a399dd5_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.f07aa15c7f7c#comments
-
The Seattle Times is one of those papers that never takes a strong stand on anything, except the occasional progressive cause, and even with those, they are always chasing the bandwagon. "News" should be facts, but it rarely is. "Opinion" should be thoughtful, eloquent and at least try to be persuasive if the writer believes in their argument. The Times is instead smug, condescending and back-slaps itself pretending it's relevant, when it isn't.
In short, they've done this to themselves by not being true journalists, but instead trying to be cool local celebs by going with the flow, always. This is what a one-paper town becomes, and with no reason to uphold quality, starts circling the drain pretty quick. Bummer for the lost jobs, but they haven't broken an important story in almost a decade. -
they took a strong stand against Hansen and the arena.TurdBuffer said:The Seattle Times is one of those papers that never takes a strong stand on anything, except the occasional progressive cause, and even with those, they are always chasing the bandwagon. "News" should be facts, but it rarely is. "Opinion" should be thoughtful, eloquent and at least try to be persuasive if the writer believes in their argument. The Times is instead smug, condescending and back-slaps itself pretending it's relevant, when it isn't.
In short, they've done this to themselves by not being true journalists, but instead trying to be cool local celebs by going with the flow, always. This is what a one-paper town becomes, and with no reason to uphold quality, starts circling the drain pretty quick. Bummer for the lost jobs, but they haven't broken an important story in almost a decade.
fuck those guys
-
Um, the Seattle Times is the conservative rag in town.
HTH -
No strong stand except when going after Husky FootballTurdBuffer said:The Seattle Times is one of those papers that never takes a strong stand on anything, except the occasional progressive cause, and even with those, they are always chasing the bandwagon. "News" should be facts, but it rarely is. "Opinion" should be thoughtful, eloquent and at least try to be persuasive if the writer believes in their argument. The Times is instead smug, condescending and back-slaps itself pretending it's relevant, when it isn't.
In short, they've done this to themselves by not being true journalists, but instead trying to be cool local celebs by going with the flow, always. This is what a one-paper town becomes, and with no reason to uphold quality, starts circling the drain pretty quick. Bummer for the lost jobs, but they haven't broken an important story in almost a decade.
