Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hugh thinks

167891012»

Comments

  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    Let's get these quotes cleaned up out here boys.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    This thread went from good to bad quickly
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,486
    phineas said:

    Let's get these quotes cleaned up out here boys.

    I'm still struggling with this. I didn't want to hit the quote button and repost 19 pics, unfortunately what I tried to do isn't much better, but better none the less.
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,486
    edited December 2016

    You guys are getting a lot of wear out of that Sugar Bowl win. I thought OU fans lived off of an old win, but I see you guys take the cake. Haven't done anything worth a damn in the past 5 years? Who cares, beat Bama in the 09 Sugar Bowl, bitches! Get on our level
    No, Crimsonite1 has a head full of cunt cheese. We (Utah fans and alumni) realize both the Sugar Bowl and the Fiesta Bowl, while proud accomplishments, are insignificant. Fielding programs to compete in the Pac-12 has been a humbling experience.
  • PurpleReign
    PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,480
    How often does vaginal bleeding come up in an average Bama thread?


    bloodycuntbubbles.jpg
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,760 Founders Club
    edited December 2022

    doogie said:

    If we run we're toast. No shot, he says.

    We need line of scrimmage reads, pre- determined routes and quick release passes into space.

    In other words, Hugh thinks that in order to have any shot at winning, we need to run Mike Leach''s offense and play like Cuogs???

    Uhh no, he basically just reiterated what Pup told orangeslice today. quick passes, especially on 1st downs until the run finds an identity. If Bama is behind, for really the 1st time all year, Gaskin and his style will find little creases go bust through. Harris meet Reuban Foster.

    Straight u p, no way to run on them. But Chad Kelly has thrown over a half mile on them in 2 years. Difference? Ole miss had zero fucking running game to make Bama pay. Washington does, and wont try to r u n straight at them (see Stanford). Conversely UW could run on USC. ..they ditched it, didnt force it and lost. But to say Hugh meant that we need to run Leach's offense shows what a buttfucking idiot you are. What's new around here
    Pup's most precient post regarding games vs Bama and USC. I could not agree more.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,721 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    If we run we're toast. No shot, he says.

    We need line of scrimmage reads, pre- determined routes and quick release passes into space.

    In other words, Hugh thinks that in order to have any shot at winning, we need to run Mike Leach''s offense and play like Cuogs???

    Uhh no, he basically just reiterated what Pup told orangeslice today. quick passes, especially on 1st downs until the run finds an identity. If Bama is behind, for really the 1st time all year, Gaskin and his style will find little creases go bust through. Harris meet Reuban Foster.

    Straight u p, no way to run on them. But Chad Kelly has thrown over a half mile on them in 2 years. Difference? Ole miss had zero fucking running game to make Bama pay. Washington does, and wont try to r u n straight at them (see Stanford). Conversely UW could run on USC. ..they ditched it, didnt force it and lost. But to say Hugh meant that we need to run Leach's offense shows what a buttfucking idiot you are. What's new around here
    Pup's most precient post regarding games vs Bama and USC. I could not agree more.
    Pumpy good at some things