It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
This would mean mean, in the hypothetical head-to-head matchup that this post was meant to examine, that Obama 2012 would have defeated Trump 2016 in the electoral college.Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442059/dont-blame-clinton-trump-2016-wouldve-beaten-obama-2012
doogie said:Not that anyone is surprised to hear this but fun to ponder.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442059/dont-blame-clinton-trump-2016-wouldve-beaten-obama-2012
Not that anyone is surprised to hear this but fun to ponder.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442059/dont-blame-clinton-trump-2016-wouldve-beaten-obama-2012
2001400ex said: doogie said:Not that anyone is surprised to hear this but fun to ponder.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442059/dont-blame-clinton-trump-2016-wouldve-beaten-obama-2012 You need a new news source.
CuntWaffle said: 2001400ex said: doogie said:Not that anyone is surprised to hear this but fun to ponder.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442059/dont-blame-clinton-trump-2016-wouldve-beaten-obama-2012 You need a new news source. Like the sources you posted showing Hillary would get an easy win?
2001400ex said: CuntWaffle said: 2001400ex said: doogie said:Not that anyone is surprised to hear this but fun to ponder.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442059/dont-blame-clinton-trump-2016-wouldve-beaten-obama-2012 You need a new news source. Like the sources you posted showing Hillary would get an easy win? Right. I only linked to RCP. And go fuck yourself if you think they are liberal.
Comments
Comparing raw numbers is retarded anyway. Trump would have defeated George Washington by millions!!!