Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.
2 ·
Comments
There has been no change to blocking.
It's fucking Pac12 refs being the fucktards they are.
Even the fucking announcers were shocked.
(Okay, maybe a ridiculous exaggeration, but still...)
Hands to the face on #8 early was a joke but I'm pretty sure they ended up punting that series anyways.
Holding call on the 4th and inches, first Husky series, also a joke. That one stung.
Stanford OL got away with some of the most flagrant, non-called holds I've ever seen in the first half. I know this goes on all the time but a couple were on the perimeter where everyone could see them. Again, they didn't score on those possessions.
Of all the blatantly bad calls or non-calls, only the phantom holding on that early Husky possession may have affected the outcome.
The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.
The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.
The hands to the face call was on #80, not #8. It was a clear foul.
The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.
The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.
That's right. I forgot about that explanation.
Totally disagree on the hold on Charles. Bang bang play, 4th and inches, a cheap hold that had no affect.
I don't see holding unless it's directly affecting the play since I tend to watch the ball carrier and whomever is chasing him. The two worst Stanford holds I saw were, 1) a tackle from behind by a guard on a run that went right through his hole, and 2) a prolonged shirt grab by the right tackle or TE, not sure, on a run around the right end.
Within 20 years this game will be two hand touch.