Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DJ, Race, PLSS a Q..

MikeDamone
MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
in Hardcore Husky Board
When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    they changed the rule, dumbest rule in football outside of hands to the face
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,842
    dhdawg said:

    they changed the rule, dumbest rule in football outside of hands to the face

    Bullshit.

    There has been no change to blocking.

    It's fucking Pac12 refs being the fucktards they are.

    Even the fucking announcers were shocked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,385 Founders Club
    the refs were just doing their jobs... just like the prison guards at Auschwitz

    (Okay, maybe a ridiculous exaggeration, but still...)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    MikeDamone said:

    When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.

    That was the one fuckup I saw from the officials all night.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    MikeDamone said:

    When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.

    That was the one fuckup I saw from the officials all night.

    Truth. Kikaha's and Shelton's hands to the face penalties were a tad cheap but by the book.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,865 Swaye's Wigwam
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    MikeDamone said:

    When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.

    That was the one fuckup I saw from the officials all night.

    PF call on Daniels was an absolute joke. They punted that series though IIRC.

    Hands to the face on #8 early was a joke but I'm pretty sure they ended up punting that series anyways.

    Holding call on the 4th and inches, first Husky series, also a joke. That one stung.

    Stanford OL got away with some of the most flagrant, non-called holds I've ever seen in the first half. I know this goes on all the time but a couple were on the perimeter where everyone could see them. Again, they didn't score on those possessions.

    Of all the blatantly bad calls or non-calls, only the phantom holding on that early Husky possession may have affected the outcome.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    chuck said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    MikeDamone said:

    When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.

    That was the one fuckup I saw from the officials all night.

    PF call on Daniels was an absolute joke. They punted that series though IIRC.

    Hands to the face on #8 early was a joke but I'm pretty sure they ended up punting that series anyways.

    Holding call on the 4th and inches, first Husky series, also a joke. That one stung.

    Stanford OL got away with some of the most flagrant, non-called holds I've ever seen in the first half. I know this goes on all the time but a couple were on the perimeter where everyone could see them. Again, they didn't score on those possessions.

    Of all the blatantly bad calls or non-calls, only the phantom holding on that early Husky possession may have affected the outcome.
    The hands to the face call was on #80, not #8. It was a clear foul.

    The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.

    The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,865 Swaye's Wigwam


    The hands to the face call was on #80, not #8. It was a clear foul.

    The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.

    The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.

    That's right. I forgot about that explanation.

    Totally disagree on the hold on Charles. Bang bang play, 4th and inches, a cheap hold that had no affect.

    I don't see holding unless it's directly affecting the play since I tend to watch the ball carrier and whomever is chasing him. The two worst Stanford holds I saw were, 1) a tackle from behind by a guard on a run that went right through his hole, and 2) a prolonged shirt grab by the right tackle or TE, not sure, on a run around the right end.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    The hold by Charles prevented the Stanford LB from making a tackle for a loss. On fourth down, that's a pretty big deal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    DerekJohnson said:

    the refs were just doing their jobs... just like the prison guards at Auschwitz Doogman

    Fixed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter