Browning has never faced Stanford

JaWarrenJaHooker

Miley threw for 98 yards vs Stanford in petermans first year. It was a disgraceful performance in Husky stadium. Stanford was 5-4 that year in conference and went to the foster farms bowl. People forget that. Yes, people forget that Stanford team sucked.

Then I forgot that CartaSamuels played in last year's debacle. I can't even remember what Browning was out with. Was he hurt or injured. Anyway Carta did better than Miley by throwing for an entire 20 more passing yards in a pathetic showing at Stanford (the stadium is actually not in Palo Alto as some believe)

Onward to Year 3 of Peterman and his boy wonder Browning. Can we expect more of the same bullshit result against a David Shaw coached defense. Have peterman and smith figured it the fuck out yet that this isn't the mountain west? A 3rd year of ineptness at the QB position would tell me a lot about Peterman and his ability to develop quarterbacks at this level. It would tell me he fucking can't

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

JaWarrenJaHooker said:

Miley threw for 98 yards vs Stanford in petermans first year. It was a disgraceful performance in Husky stadium. Stanford was 5-4 that year in conference and went to the foster farms bowl. People forget that. Yes, people forget that Stanford team sucked.

Then I forgot that CartaSamuels played in last year's debacle. I can't even remember what Browning was out with. Was he hurt or injured. Anyway Carta did better than Miley by throwing for an entire 20 more passing yards in a pathetic showing at Stanford (the stadium is actually not in Palo Alto as some believe)

Onward to Year 3 of Peterman and his boy wonder Browning. Can we expect more of the same bullshit result against a David Shaw coached defense. Have peterman and smith figured it the fuck out yet that this isn't the mountain west? A 3rd year of ineptness at the QB position would tell me a lot about Peterman and his ability to develop quarterbacks at this level. It would tell me he fucking can't

Abundance.

LoneStarDawg

Counterpoint: Stanford has never faced Browning!

Doogitup.gif

Passion

LoneStarDawg said:

Counterpoint: Stanford has never faced Browning!

Doogitup.gif

Somebody post the brownsocks photo.

Utah, cal, asu, oregon, arizona (arguably) are all games where Jake made stupid plays down the stretch. Mistakes when he needed to shine. When he had the chance to be a difference maker and rise to the occasion, he wilted.

Having a high completion percentage and throwing TDs in blowout games is not how to make your mark.

Will this Friday be different?

Southerndawg

Last year, the "best defense in the Pac12" was gashed by Stanford's O-Line and McCaffrey, and Stanford's defense completely contained the Husky's offense. Stanford dominated both sides of the ball without breaking a sweat, the Huskies had no chance.

So far this year the Huskies haven't proven a thing. Three cupcakes and a side of thin sliced mediocre ham that took them to OT says they'e being teed up for a loss. We'll see. Browning could be the difference either way. If he has a stellar game, they probably have a shot at a win, if he goes into Brownshorts mode, it's probably game over. To state the obvious, IMO, there are two keys, the simple tried and true formula for winning football games. Establish the run to set up the passing game, and contain their running game to force them to beat the Huskies secondary. The Huskies have better than average talent, speed and power, but if they play like they did against Arizona, they're going to have their asses handed to them. Play to their ability, execute at a high level, and deal with the inevitable pressure that's coming and they have a legitimate shot. For now, I'm in LIFPO, leaning towards TSIO in less than two weeks. We'll see soon enough.

dnc

WASHINGTON wins this game

Southerndawg

dnc said:

WASHINGTON wins this game

COOK IT !!!!1111!11!!!!!!!1111

BearsWiin

Passion said:

LoneStarDawg said:

Counterpoint: Stanford has never faced Browning!

Doogitup.gif

Somebody post the brownsocks photo.

Utah, cal, asu, oregon, arizona (arguably) are all games where Jake made stupid plays down the stretch. Mistakes when he needed to shine. When he had the chance to be a difference maker and rise to the occasion, he wilted.

Having a high completion percentage and throwing TDs in blowout games is not how to make your mark.

RaceBannon

BearsWiin said:

Passion said:

LoneStarDawg said:

Counterpoint: Stanford has never faced Browning!

Doogitup.gif

Somebody post the brownsocks photo.

Utah, cal, asu, oregon, arizona (arguably) are all games where Jake made stupid plays down the stretch. Mistakes when he needed to shine. When he had the chance to be a difference maker and rise to the occasion, he wilted.

Having a high completion percentage and throwing TDs in blowout games is not how to make your mark.

Where does the sun rise?

Uhhhh....huh?

Southerndawg

RaceBannon said:

BearsWiin said:

Passion said:

LoneStarDawg said:

Counterpoint: Stanford has never faced Browning!

Doogitup.gif

Somebody post the brownsocks photo.

Utah, cal, asu, oregon, arizona (arguably) are all games where Jake made stupid plays down the stretch. Mistakes when he needed to shine. When he had the chance to be a difference maker and rise to the occasion, he wilted.

Having a high completion percentage and throwing TDs in blowout games is not how to make your mark.

Where does the sun rise?

Uhhhh....huh?

In that photo Goff looks like he's sporting an extra chromosome and just made a doody in his shorts. Explains a few things.

WeAreAFatLesboSchool

I like Stanford in this one.

NEsnake12

If Stanford was fully healthy I wouldn't be optimistic about Brownings ability to step up in this game, because their secondary is the strength of the defense this year. But both of Stanfords starting corners got injured against UCLA, and are questionable for the game Friday. If they're out, I like our chances a lot better.

Daniels will have to have a big game regardless... UCLA's TE was the only receiver who had a halfway decent game cause the ILBs of Stanford aren't good in coverage. If he's dropping shit like he usually does its gonna absolutely kill the pass game.

TurdBomber

We lost these games last year because the O couldn't sustain drives and the D was on the field too long. Stanford, Oregon, and especially Utah fall into that category, some because of bad QBing, lots because of a POS receiving corps that allowed opposing D's to cheat up and bottle up the offense.

Jake has better, more reliable targets this year, and looks a little stronger, but still not strong enough to throw darts on crossing routes, so, why the fuck do we even call those plays on 3rd downs and such? Same old problem of designing and calling plays that don't fit your athletes and talent on the field. I fucking hate that stupid shit more than anything the dawgs do.

I'll go with the Dawgs on this one, based largely on what I watched the Hawks do to SF last Sunday. I.e., if they can put it all together and play to their potential, they can beat Stanford by 2 or 3 scores. If not - and this is what Stanford is counting on - our immaturity will amp up our nerves, cause us to do stupid shit like draw dumb penalties, force throws, or fumble the ball in the red zone or on punt returns, and the offense will implode, handing away the game to Stanford.

UW has more talent than Stanford. Game is ours? to Lose.

Southerndawg

NEsnake12 said:

If Stanford was fully healthy I wouldn't be optimistic about Brownings ability to step up in this game, because their secondary is the strength of the defense this year. But both of Stanfords starting corners got injured against UCLA, and are questionable for the game Friday. If they're out, I like our chances a lot better.

Daniels will have to have a big game regardless... UCLA's TE was the only receiver who had a halfway decent game cause the ILBs of Stanford aren't good in coverage. If he's dropping shit like he usually does its gonna absolutely kill the pass game.

For some time now Stanford has been the only team in the conference that has "next man up" depth. Don't count on injuries to slow them down that much.

Baseman

TurdBuffer said:

We lost these games last year because the O couldn't sustain drives and the D was on the field too long. Stanford, Oregon, and especially Utah fall into that category, some because of bad QBing, lots because of a POS receiving corps that allowed opposing D's to cheat up and bottle up the offense.

Jake has better, more reliable targets this year, and looks a little stronger, but still not strong enough to throw darts on crossing routes, so, why the fuck do we even call those plays on 3rd downs and such? Same old problem of designing and calling plays that don't fit your athletes and talent on the field. I fucking hate that stupid shit more than anything the dawgs do.

I'll go with the Dawgs on this one, based largely on what I watched the Hawks do to SF last Sunday. I.e., if they can put it all together and play to their potential, they can beat Stanford by 2 or 3 scores. If not - and this is what Stanford is counting on - our immaturity will amp up our nerves, cause us to do stupid shit like draw dumb penalties, force throws, or fumble the ball in the red zone or on punt returns, and the offense will implode, handing away the game to Stanford.

UW has more talent than Stanford. Game is ours? to Lose.

9/4/2015 - Present day.

RaceBannon

I hope Browning goes 11 for 13 for 230 yards as Gaskin runs for 190 and our DAWGS win rather easily and I have to do up downs for doubting him

Dennis_DeYoung

RaceBannon said:

I hope Browning goes 11 for 13 for 230 yards as Gaskin runs for 190 and our DAWGS win rather easily and I have to do up downs for doubting him

This is the realest poast in this history of this craphole bored.

TierbsHsotBoobs

RaceBannon said:

I hope Browning goes 11 for 13 for 230 yards as Gaskin runs for 190 and our DAWGS win rather easily and I have to do up downs for doubting him

You know how the Script plays out after that though?

















13 in a row.

GrundleStiltzkin

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:

I hope Browning goes 11 for 13 for 230 yards as Gaskin runs for 190 and our DAWGS win rather easily and I have to do up downs for doubting him

You know how the Script plays out after that though?

















13 in a row.

I'd survive.

RaceBannon

GrundleStiltzkin said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:

I hope Browning goes 11 for 13 for 230 yards as Gaskin runs for 190 and our DAWGS win rather easily and I have to do up downs for doubting him

You know how the Script plays out after that though?

















13 in a row.

I'd survive.

We are Cub fans when it comes to Oregon.

doogsinparadise

UW does not have more talent than Stanford. #olinesuperiorityguy