I played on a pretty athletic team in high school

Dardanus

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/washington-may-not-be-that-good-and-we-may-not-be-that-bad.106524/

How many drives did Washington put up against Rutgers? Did they really look all that dominant? Rutgers didn't exactly get manhandled here. For an opener this may be alarming to the Washington football staff. I played on a pretty athletic team in high school and this was often a concern during a blowout in a scrimage or beginning of the season. With the exception of the quarterback position I don't believe we have a actual talent problem. Anyone can look slow and unathletic when they take the wrong angle to make a tackle. The punt team definitely needs fixing.

Gladstone

They were stopped short in the red zone three different occasions. Only one score came from the Red Zone and that was after an interception return to the 5-yar line. Their offense looked dry an ineffective especially when they started in their own 20. Their running game was basically non-existent.


HRYK

CaptainPJ

Dardanus said:

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/washington-may-not-be-that-good-and-we-may-not-be-that-bad.106524/

How many drives did Washington put up against Rutgers? Did they really look all that dominant? Rutgers didn't exactly get manhandled here. For an opener this may be alarming to the Washington football staff. I played on a pretty athletic team in high school and this was often a concern during a blowout in a scrimage or beginning of the season. With the exception of the quarterback position I don't believe we have a actual talent problem. Anyone can look slow and unathletic when they take the wrong angle to make a tackle. The punt team definitely needs fixing.

"cuogs" of the "Cony Island cuogs?!"

Solid.

Home,Home-and-homes forever

Mad_Son

I hope I never read another one of AlaskaDoog's posts gain

Baseman

Did they put together good drives? Most of their plays were big plays. This is important to a coaching staff. Yes Rutgers was blown out but you seem to not understand what exactly getting manhandled means. Getting manhandled is what the UConn offensive line and Donald Brown did to Rutgers. Getting manhandled is what Brian Kelly Cincinnati passing offense did to Rutgers. They were able to move the ball at will.

HuskyJW

Jesus Christ.

Did they really look all that dominant?

Watch the 1st quarter again asshole.....you couldn't ask for better.

Southerndawg

I will say the S&C coach should give his check to "the weak sisters of the blind", Our o-line got man handles, except for LT he looked good
Special team coach should work on coverage and not the synchronized arm swinging Looked embarrassing when they get a 92 yard TD. add punt coverage. (and the Rockettes arm swing was out of sync. to boot)
Ash looked like Early Schiano, deer in the head lights. Had no answers/adjustments at halftime yes he is learning on the job & he will improve,
speaking of Schiano our DC is an ole school fart only would play front 4 who faired just Ok but the hard ass blitzing package is gone from Rutgers play book. I guess nothing of Schiano aggressiveness rubbed off on Ash.
Outside of that there were many many mistakes by players and coaches which can and will be rectified with good coaching and watching film. this is a good staff and our talent is miles ahead of the Shea era as another post tried to suggest.
this was a sloppy dress rehearsal; it does not mean a bad season.
Some may rip me, for kicking the secrete cow. But I have been in the players shoes and a good mentality/attitude (Coaching} of the team, we will bounce back. It was an OOC game so let it go.

GrundleStiltzkin

Southerndawg said:

I will say the S&C coach should give his check to "the weak sisters of the blind", Our o-line got man handles, except for LT he looked good
Special team coach should work on coverage and not the synchronized arm swinging Looked embarrassing when they get a 92 yard TD. add punt coverage. (and the Rockettes arm swing was out of sync. to boot)
Ash looked like Early Schiano, deer in the head lights. Had no answers/adjustments at halftime yes he is learning on the job & he will improve,
speaking of Schiano our DC is an ole school fart only would play front 4 who faired just Ok but the hard ass blitzing package is gone from Rutgers play book. I guess nothing of Schiano aggressiveness rubbed off on Ash.
Outside of that there were many many mistakes by players and coaches which can and will be rectified with good coaching and watching film. this is a good staff and our talent is miles ahead of the Shea era as another post tried to suggest.
this was a sloppy dress rehearsal; it does not mean a bad season.
Some may rip me, for kicking the secrete cow. But I have been in the players shoes and a good mentality/attitude (Coaching} of the team, we will bounce back. It was an OOC game so let it go.

GrundleStiltzkin

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Southerndawg said:

I will say the S&C coach should give his check to "the weak sisters of the blind", Our o-line got man handles, except for LT he looked good
Special team coach should work on coverage and not the synchronized arm swinging Looked embarrassing when they get a 92 yard TD. add punt coverage. (and the Rockettes arm swing was out of sync. to boot)
Ash looked like Early Schiano, deer in the head lights. Had no answers/adjustments at halftime yes he is learning on the job & he will improve,
speaking of Schiano our DC is an ole school fart only would play front 4 who faired just Ok but the hard ass blitzing package is gone from Rutgers play book. I guess nothing of Schiano aggressiveness rubbed off on Ash.
Outside of that there were many many mistakes by players and coaches which can and will be rectified with good coaching and watching film. this is a good staff and our talent is miles ahead of the Shea era as another post tried to suggest.
this was a sloppy dress rehearsal; it does not mean a bad season.
Some may rip me, for kicking the secrete cow. But I have been in the players shoes and a good mentality/attitude (Coaching} of the team, we will bounce back. It was an OOC game so let it go.

Damn, RIP Ivan Lewis eating hotdogs pic

Southerndawg

GrundleStiltzkin said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Southerndawg said:

I will say the S&C coach should give his check to "the weak sisters of the blind", Our o-line got man handles, except for LT he looked good
Special team coach should work on coverage and not the synchronized arm swinging Looked embarrassing when they get a 92 yard TD. add punt coverage. (and the Rockettes arm swing was out of sync. to boot)
Ash looked like Early Schiano, deer in the head lights. Had no answers/adjustments at halftime yes he is learning on the job & he will improve,
speaking of Schiano our DC is an ole school fart only would play front 4 who faired just Ok but the hard ass blitzing package is gone from Rutgers play book. I guess nothing of Schiano aggressiveness rubbed off on Ash.
Outside of that there were many many mistakes by players and coaches which can and will be rectified with good coaching and watching film. this is a good staff and our talent is miles ahead of the Shea era as another post tried to suggest.
this was a sloppy dress rehearsal; it does not mean a bad season.
Some may rip me, for kicking the secrete cow. But I have been in the players shoes and a good mentality/attitude (Coaching} of the team, we will bounce back. It was an OOC game so let it go.

Damn, RIP Ivan Lewis eating hotdogs pic

"O-line got man handles" and "kicking the secrete cow". It's never a good idea to kick a secreting cow.

rodmansrage

Dardanus said:

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/washington-may-not-be-that-good-and-we-may-not-be-that-bad.106524/

How many drives did Washington put up against Rutgers? Did they really look all that dominant? Rutgers didn't exactly get manhandled here. For an opener this may be alarming to the Washington football staff. I played on a pretty athletic team in high school and this was often a concern during a blowout in a scrimage or beginning of the season. With the exception of the quarterback position I don't believe we have a actual talent problem. Anyone can look slow and unathletic when they take the wrong angle to make a tackle. The punt team definitely needs fixing.

i played football in high school too. we coulda won state if coach woulda put me in, i just know it.

Alexis

"or kicking the secrete cow."

Irregardless, it's a mute point about the French benefits.

LoneStarDawg

Southerndawg said:

I will say the S&C coach should give his check to "the weak sisters of the blind", Our o-line got man handles, except for LT he looked good
Special team coach should work on coverage and not the synchronized arm swinging Looked embarrassing when they get a 92 yard TD. add punt coverage. (and the Rockettes arm swing was out of sync. to boot)
Ash looked like Early Schiano, deer in the head lights. Had no answers/adjustments at halftime yes he is learning on the job & he will improve,
speaking of Schiano our DC is an ole school fart only would play front 4 who faired just Ok but the hard ass blitzing package is gone from Rutgers play book. I guess nothing of Schiano aggressiveness rubbed off on Ash.
Outside of that there were many many mistakes by players and coaches which can and will be rectified with good coaching and watching film. this is a good staff and our talent is miles ahead of the Shea era as another post tried to suggest.
this was a sloppy dress rehearsal; it does not mean a bad season.
Some may rip me, for kicking the secrete cow. But I have been in the players shoes and a good mentality/attitude (Coaching} of the team, we will bounce back. It was an OOC game so let it go.

fuck you psalm

puppylove_sugarsteel

Rutgers isnt Idaho.

TierbsHsotBoobs

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Rutgers isnt Idaho.

This is one of your best football posts ever.

ApostleofGrief

Dardanus said:

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/washington-may-not-be-that-good-and-we-may-not-be-that-bad.106524/

How many drives did Washington put up against Rutgers? Did they really look all that dominant? Rutgers didn't exactly get manhandled here. For an opener this may be alarming to the Washington football staff. I played on a pretty athletic team in high school and this was often a concern during a blowout in a scrimage or beginning of the season. With the exception of the quarterback position I don't believe we have a actual talent problem. Anyone can look slow and unathletic when they take the wrong angle to make a tackle. The punt team definitely needs fixing.

Why don't you just say "quarterback"? everybody knows it's a position. This style is in vogue for no good reason.

DongJames

ApostleofGrief said:

Dardanus said:

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/washington-may-not-be-that-good-and-we-may-not-be-that-bad.106524/

How many drives did Washington put up against Rutgers? Did they really look all that dominant? Rutgers didn't exactly get manhandled here. For an opener this may be alarming to the Washington football staff. I played on a pretty athletic team in high school and this was often a concern during a blowout in a scrimage or beginning of the season. With the exception of the quarterback position I don't believe we have a actual talent problem. Anyone can look slow and unathletic when they take the wrong angle to make a tackle. The punt team definitely needs fixing.

Why don't you just say "quarterback"? everybody knows it's a position. This style is in vogue for no good reason.

it's like when LeBron James refers to "the game of basketball"

Dardanus

ApostleofGrief said:

Dardanus said:

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/washington-may-not-be-that-good-and-we-may-not-be-that-bad.106524/

How many drives did Washington put up against Rutgers? Did they really look all that dominant? Rutgers didn't exactly get manhandled here. For an opener this may be alarming to the Washington football staff. I played on a pretty athletic team in high school and this was often a concern during a blowout in a scrimage or beginning of the season. With the exception of the quarterback position I don't believe we have a actual talent problem. Anyone can look slow and unathletic when they take the wrong angle to make a tackle. The punt team definitely needs fixing.

Why don't you just say "quarterback"? everybody knows it's a position. This style is in vogue for no good reason.

Whoosh. But I agree.

PineapplePirate

Fix the angle of those tackles and this is a completely different game I agree.. this game should have gone to overtime to say the least. I think the Rutgers players just need to take some college geometry and they could be potential BCS bids. You know what they always say, athleticism and angles, the key to success. I think they'll fix the 130 degree angle tackles and go for more acute tackles, that should definitely show some improvement in their upcoming dogfight this weekend.