Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Foster Sarell, we got a shot with him?

1568101114

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Road DAWG is partially right, and Coker is partially right.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    edited October 2016

    I doubt the big doofus is making a decision until after the season. Why won't you guys enjoy UW's season and worry about this TBS bullshit after the season? This is not a case of abundance. It's a case of being a faggot.

    A select few are actually complaining about the OL coach of probably the best OL in the Pac 12 because a teenage boy might not be a huge fan of said coach.

    It would be even better to not worry at all. You guys are adults worrying about a high school kid. If you personally know the kid it would be one thing, but I doubt any of you do. It's truly creepy and gay to come up with certain scenarios and talk about how he will feel in 20 years.

    It's only kind of bad to use recruiting as a distraction when UW sucks. UW doesn't suck though.

    I apologize for wanting a coach that can coach and recruit, whether you like to admit it or not, really good players help.
    You mean like Trey Adams?

    I doubt the big doofus is making a decision until after the season. Why won't you guys enjoy UW's season and worry about this TBS bullshit after the season? This is not a case of abundance. It's a case of being a faggot.

    A select few are actually complaining about the OL coach of probably the best OL in the Pac 12 because a teenage boy might not be a huge fan of said coach.

    It would be even better to not worry at all. You guys are adults worrying about a high school kid. If you personally know the kid it would be one thing, but I doubt any of you do. It's truly creepy and gay to come up with certain scenarios and talk about how he will feel in 20 years.

    It's only kind of bad to use recruiting as a distraction when UW sucks. UW doesn't suck though.

    I apologize for wanting a coach that can coach and recruit, whether you like to admit it or not, really good players help.
    You mean like Trey Adams?
    Would you like me to go through the list of recruits we've missed on on the OL?

    And yes, I do mean like Trey Adams, we need more players like him and we haven't gotten anywhere near enough.
    Sure.

    Who gives a shit on who we missed when we have the best OL in the conference?
    I'd like UW to be really good for a long time.
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    BlowItUp said:

    Pete cant build a Pete Carroll/SC dynasty in the pac 12 unless he gets good ass players. you ain't beaten Ohio State and Bama without keeping guys like Sarrell home. not sure why this doenst hit home for more people.

    "good ass players"

    You mean like 4 star, top 300 recruit RSFr Henry Roberts, who is 3rd string, and was beat out by little TrueFr Nick Harris?
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    in the last 6 years Bama has had the best recruiting classes, Ohio State has had the 2nd best over that span.

    pretty crazy that they are the best teams, eh?

  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    BlowItUp said:

    in the last 6 years Bama has had the best recruiting classes, Ohio State has had the 2nd best over that span.

    pretty crazy that they are the best teams, eh?

    And 6 years ago, UW was a couple of years removed from 0-12.

    Get a grip on yourself. If we get Fozzie, that would be awesome. If not, there are plenty of other fish in the sea.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    This is such a retarded argument by Roadie.

    Why does literally every college coach spend all their spare time recruiting if it didn't matter. Why doesn't Bama just take whomever?

    Why are we renting a helicopter for the first time ever to go to fucking Spanaway?! I mean—we can have Brandon Pili. Why bother? Right Roadie?

    Just take whomever. Straußer's and Pete's pecking order doesn't mean hardly anything, probably, right?

    Just fuck it. All the evidence points to the fact that recruiting is unimportant to high quality coaches. It's a real mystery why Straußer is wasting his time and sweat when he will get players who will be great no matter what!

    I can't figure that shit out.

    It matters a shitload.

    But you can't get so invested in getting one guy that you freak the fuck out if he goes elsewhere.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Recruiting matter MORE now that we're? good. Roadie has that completely backwards.

    The ruse was that it was always retarded to care about recruiting under Ty and Sark because we knew they wouldn't do shit with top recruits anyways. (See Thompson, Shaq and Lockner, Jack).

    It's almost like some of you Doogs can't compartmentalize between Adolf Strausser the recruiter and Adolf Strausser the (excellent) coach.

    "We got Adams" is not an argument.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,501

    This is such a retarded argument by Roadie.

    Why does literally every college coach spend all their spare time recruiting if it didn't matter. Why doesn't Bama just take whomever?

    Why are we renting a helicopter for the first time ever to go to fucking Spanaway?! I mean—we can have Brandon Pili. Why bother? Right Roadie?

    Just take whomever. Straußer's and Pete's pecking order doesn't mean hardly anything, probably, right?

    Just fuck it. All the evidence points to the fact that recruiting is unimportant to high quality coaches. It's a real mystery why Straußer is wasting his time and sweat when he will get players who will be great no matter what!

    I can't figure that shit out.

    So what's the point in all this? Do you honestly want Strausser fired?
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    AIRWOLF said:

    This is such a retarded argument by Roadie.

    Why does literally every college coach spend all their spare time recruiting if it didn't matter. Why doesn't Bama just take whomever?

    Why are we renting a helicopter for the first time ever to go to fucking Spanaway?! I mean—we can have Brandon Pili. Why bother? Right Roadie?

    Just take whomever. Straußer's and Pete's pecking order doesn't mean hardly anything, probably, right?

    Just fuck it. All the evidence points to the fact that recruiting is unimportant to high quality coaches. It's a real mystery why Straußer is wasting his time and sweat when he will get players who will be great no matter what!

    I can't figure that shit out.

    It matters a shitload.

    But you can't get so invested in getting one guy that you freak the fuck out if he goes elsewhere.
    It's not just one guy is the thing though.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    AIRWOLF said:

    This is such a retarded argument by Roadie.

    Why does literally every college coach spend all their spare time recruiting if it didn't matter. Why doesn't Bama just take whomever?

    Why are we renting a helicopter for the first time ever to go to fucking Spanaway?! I mean—we can have Brandon Pili. Why bother? Right Roadie?

    Just take whomever. Straußer's and Pete's pecking order doesn't mean hardly anything, probably, right?

    Just fuck it. All the evidence points to the fact that recruiting is unimportant to high quality coaches. It's a real mystery why Straußer is wasting his time and sweat when he will get players who will be great no matter what!

    I can't figure that shit out.

    It matters a shitload.

    But you can't get so invested in getting one guy that you freak the fuck out if he goes elsewhere.
    /thread
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    lmfao @ "Straußer"
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,501

    @Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?

    You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.

    Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.

    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.

    If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.

    In the past, I haven't always agreed with you, @RoadDawg55 but this deserves post of the year
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    @Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?

    You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.

    Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.

    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.

    If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.

    You kinda get it, and kinda don't. Wanting to be good in two years AS WELL as this year is like two sides of the same fucking coin. Just because they patched bullshit and chicken wire together into a usable line this year has no bearing on whether they'd be able to do the same next year.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    @Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?

    You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.

    Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.

    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.

    If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.

    We are just at different parts of the universe here. I am enjoying the fuck out of this season, a big reason is because I could see it coming because of how Pete was recruiting.

    I want to be great this year, and great in two years and in five years. If we don't recruit better on the OL it will hurt us going forward. So yeah, i'd like us to recruit better at OL.
    I know you are enjoying this year. And I still love you. There are a lot of variables other than Fozzy though. We don't know if Roberts, the big kid from Oregon, Burleson, etc suck. Maybe they just aren't ready right now.

    My early opinion is that the next two years are our best chance at a title. Not on some orange slices shit, but the coaching staff has made a big effort to get Sarrell and if he doesn't come, it will be hard for me to do anything but shrug.

    If the OL sucks in a few years I will certainly bitch, but until they do, why would I complain about anything. This is completely different than Sark whiffing on Garnett.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    if we win enough, recruiting will work itself out eventually
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123


    1) Everyone here wants Sarrell.

    2) The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.

    1) Okay then. STFU.

    2) I'm sorry we are upsetting your happy timez with our negativity.

    ----
    Not since the days of dawgman have I seen anyone more on their period about how THE SKY IS NOT FALLING, OL RECRUITING WILL BE FINE and ENJOY THE RIDE GUYS than @RoadDawg55 is. His bleeding vag needs a fucking 12 day trigger warning every time someone brings up OL recruiting. You can always count on him to come in and slop cunt blood all over whatever thread it is where people are talking about how our OL recruiting sucks.

    It's just fundamentally retarded to argue we can't think about the future and this year at the same time. But I guess if you're the leader of the OL Board Period Police it's important that this be a safe space for you and your friends where you can just only think about this year.
    You're being a pussy and have a serious TBS addiction. When the OL sucks we can bitch. Until then, stfu. It really is fucking retarded to complain about the coach of the best OL we have had in well over a decade. I don't know why you have such a hard time with that line of thinking. It's seems obviously logical to me.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754


    1) Everyone here wants Sarrell.

    2) The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.

    1) Okay then. STFU.

    2) I'm sorry we are upsetting your happy timez with our negativity.

    ----
    Not since the days of dawgman have I seen anyone more on their period about how THE SKY IS NOT FALLING, OL RECRUITING WILL BE FINE and ENJOY THE RIDE GUYS than @RoadDawg55 is. His bleeding vag needs a fucking 12 day trigger warning every time someone brings up OL recruiting. You can always count on him to come in and slop cunt blood all over whatever thread it is where people are talking about how our OL recruiting sucks.

    It's just fundamentally retarded to argue we can't think about the future and this year at the same time. But I guess if you're the leader of the OL Board Period Police it's important that this be a safe space for you and your friends where you can just only think about this year.
    You're being a pussy and have a serious TBS addiction. When the OL sucks we can bitch. Until then, stfu. It really is fucking retarded to complain about the coach of the best OL we have had in well over a decade. I don't know why you have such a hard time with that line of thinking. It's seems obviously logical to me.
    hurtful.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited October 2016
    The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.

    The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.

    Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.

    So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have.

    @Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

  • doogville
    doogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,227 Swaye's Wigwam
    So... are getting fozzy bear or not? Why am I paying my $10.95?