Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bowl Game rewatch thoughts

13»

Comments

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,563 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I always kept wondering if they know that you can run screens to the halfback instead of the receiver and have a higher success rate.

    No, it depends on the blocking execution. Id rather have Ross on a well blocked screen than Coleman,Dwash or daniels. WTF J? Who is the halfback you are referring to? Id much rather have a TE screen to Cam Cleeland. But you wouldnt remember.
    Higher level discussion right here...lol

    A screen's success rate depends a lot on the blocking execution? You don't say? Maybe if you had half a brain you'd realize that bubble/tunnel screens employ receivers to do the bulk of the blocking and screens out of the backfield use linemen. Guess who blocks better?
    PRECISELY my point buttfuck. And linemen are required to release and block downfield on inside WR screens as well. Blocking downfield is the responsibility of both units. A screen play allows linemen to block past the LOS. They dont sit idle on WR screens you fucking idiot.
    Who's at the point of attack? That's what I thought.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    HFNY said:

    The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.

    You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.
    Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...
    Yes, that explains how the run was working against Cal and then we? stopped running the ball. The talent...

    Fuck off back to Doogman with this shit.
    I love when you try and talk football tommis. Reminds me of my girlfriend on post game drives from the stadium. (Of course I quickly tell her to shut her hole)
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    HFNY said:

    The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.

    You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.
    Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...
    Yes, that explains how the run was working against Cal and then we? stopped running the ball. The talent...

    Fuck off back to Doogman with this shit.
    I love when you try and talk football tommis. Reminds me of my girlfriend on post game drives from the stadium. (Of course I quickly tell her to shut her hole)
    Dazzle us with your Kim fed excuse for no longer running the ball in that game after marching down the fucking field on 4 straight run plays.

    We're waiting...
Sign In or Register to comment.