What if...

Gladstone

Romar could sodomise Mother Theresa and doogs would still gleefully come to his defense and savagely attack any rational, logical, dreaming-of-greatness fan.

ThomasFremont

Tequilla said:

A large part of the reason why Romar is able to develop guards is because his offenses traditionally specialize in rat ball concepts where guard play is going to dominate the process.

Anybody that can't see at this point that at this point Romar's just cashing those damn checks and regardless of whether or not he has that fire in his belly to win or not deserves Owen-27 or whatever a full basketball season of losses is worth.

Now you're just padding your word count...

RoadDawg55

greenblood said:

FreeChavez said:

greenblood said:

bananasnblondes said:

We have Fultz coming in? Do you want to lose Fultz?

Getting this one 5 star player in for one year is more important than the future of the program

Nobody turns 5 star talent into 3 stars quite like Romar.

BUT HE WAS DRAFTED.

most nba players without college success ever!

I wonder if people pay attention to how good guys like Isaiah Thomas, Brandon Roy, and Nate Robinson are/were.

I think Brandon Roy was expected to be good, but he even exceeded expectations while healthy. Isaiah Thomas and Nate Robinson were good at UW, but I'd say they exceeded expectations as well in the NBA.

Doogs think that Romar prepared these guys to be solid NBA players. Those in the know think that Romar held them back, and once they landed with a "Real" coach, lived up to their true potential.

Yeah, those guys were really good. I think everyone realizes that. I do agree about Isaiah. He was pretty good his freshman and sophomore years, but I wondered why he wasn't going off more.